Nowadays the quantum theorists consider the Bohr’s successes as accidental, because they face the following dillema:

1- Bohr considered in his mathematical calculation that the electron is submitted to a centripetal acceleration in the instant when a photon is emitted by the atom. Therefore, according to the Bohr model, the centripetal acceleration on the electron plays a rule in his model of atom. And we realize that from Bohr’s theory the emission of photons is connected to the centripetal acceleration of the electron.

2- So Bohr model of atom is incompatible with the fundamental principles of Quantum Mechanics, because the centripetal acceleration cannot exist without a trajectory, and it’s well known that the concept of treajectory cannot exist in QM.

3- Therefore, in order to be 100% correct the hydrogen atom of Quantum Mechanics, it is required that Bohr’s model must be 100% wrong. Otherwise, if Bohr’s model has even a weak botton of truth (that is, if it is not 100% wrong), this imply that Quantum Mechanics is not 100% correct. And this is the reason why the quantum theorists claim that Bohr’s successes are accidental, which means that his model is 100% wrong.


But from the mathematical probability it makes no sense to consider the Bohr’s successes as accidental. Thereby something must be correct in his model, in spite of his theory is not correct. In another words, the mathematical probability shows us the electron is submitted to a centripetal force in the instant of photon emission, although we don’t know what such a fact means.

Argonne labs once thought that a nanodiamond particle of 4nm was C500, however after many $millions in R&D discovered that it was closer to C20,000. This could only be possible with hyper atomic compression, hence overcoming the Coulomb Barrier to produce a compound of superior strength.

As a student in the University of Idaho’s electrical engineering program in the early nineties, I can remember our study of synchronous motor operation in a 300-level laboratory classroom. One of us students asked “What happens when a synchronous motor loads to the point where conventional synchronous operation is lost?” - and the answer, in retrospect, seems to have been somewhat cursory: “In a slipped pole condition… the rotor’s magnetic field poles ‘slip’ from their stable attractive arrangement with the machine’s current-induced stator poles, and wind up ‘bouncing off’ the repulsive poles on the other side of things… large transient currents are induced, and circuit breakers pop…”

A fuel economy enhancement application is presently being pursued as well.

In March 2004 Dr. Eugene Mallove suggested to W. Guglinski to put his articles in a book form.

The Managing Editor Christy Frazier sent to Guglinski an email saying the following:

Our editor suggests that since you have developed so many interesting, intriguing theories that you consider one of the following: publishing a book which melds the many theories together OR starting your own website, where you can post all of your papers for the public to see. IE would surely link from our site to yours, if you created one which had your many papers available.