ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 108 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Theory of Expansion
Posted on Saturday, March 05, 2005 @ 11:45:03 UTC by vlad

Science sams writes: What is Expansion

We are living in the most intriguing time, in a universe like nothing we imagined just a few short years ago.
A hypothetical such as, is man expanding or contracting by some mysterious force were curiosities of fiction.

Humans e.g. are not subject to this phenomenon of universal expansion; the dark matter (DM) permeating our frame has higher thermal value in comparison to DM in space.
Theoretically with the earth continuously being depleted of thermal energy, contraction will occur to the matter in possession of the highest thermal content first and translate to a decrease in fmp* diameter (DM) .


Here we may apply the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law claims that "Energy spontaneously tends to flow only from being concentrated in one place to becoming diffused or dispersed and spread out".
As long as our planet compensates our thermal value we are safe, and dark matter will absorb energy from the higher thermal emitting matter (E.g. earth, stars, galaxies etc.).

When considering universal expansion we can only observe what we can see. Suppose we observe the stars in the outlying universe, and suppose we observe idiosyncratic mannerism of everyday matter, can we structure common inherent properties. Assuming the universe, galaxies and all the matter on earth are permeated * by dark matter particles, can these idiosyncratic phenomenon in possession of these structural and behavioral characteristics apply a logical postulate?

There is a consensus in the astronomical community that most of the mass in most galaxies is non-luminous dark matter and those celestial objects in space and matter on earth are analogous.

Dark matter is the generic term for the fundamental particles in the universe though not directly observable, do permeate all matter and fill all space with their presence as inferred by the motion of galaxies.

Dark Matter particles absorb contiguously and omni - directionally thermal information from higher energy sources (e.g.stars).
Hypothetically one may extrapolate an increase in thermal content will increase the diameter and or the local content of fundamental particles (DM) and interpret this as an increase in universal volume

If this assumption is valid than our sun's thermal information (energy) lose to DM should lead to an increase in earth's orbit even if ever so slight.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
fmp * = fundamental particles (The term "fundamental particle" is used here to avoid having to invent new terminology)

permeate*
The fmp- forms a 3 dimensional geometrical lattice, isometric, homogeneous, permeate and immerse all matter and assist to define the magnitude of the universe with their volume inflation.
The neutral fmp (graviton) is instrumental in the construction of plasma; graviton particles must rest in an adjacent formation. Sequentially vast quantities of contactual neutral particles are needed to simply fill the volume and implement a route for universal thermodynamic transference.

http://ca.geocities.com/Samsade@rogers.com/cosmology/exp.index.html


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Theory of Expansion" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Theory of Expansion (Score: 1)
by malc on Monday, March 07, 2005 @ 00:25:35 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
All theories depend on the interpretation of observable phenomena. Therefore all theories are entirely dependant on the correct assumption about the proporty of the information transfer mechanism i.e. light (assuming we don't listen to the universe !).

So if the speed of light wasn't a constant but was merely apparently so in our region of space then this would change everything and would account for a lot of the anomolies. We know that the speed of light changes depending on the medium through which it travels so surely it is not incorrect to hypothosise that the speed in "vacuum" is dependant on the nature of the "vacuum". The assumption in the past was that the vacuum was empty but we know now that this is not the case. What if the vacuum of deep space was more empty than the vacuum in our solar system ? If you assume that there is no dark matter but that all observable anaomolies are due to a difference in the speed of light what would the speed of light be ?



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.