ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 348 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    dark energy
    Posted on Tuesday, March 08, 2005 @ 20:14:23 GMT by vlad

    Science sams writes: Dark Energy Dark Matter


    what is potential rest energy ? That is the stuff between the stuff we canot see.

    A description of potential rest energy; - - It is extensively nuetral, and almost {no motion, no spin}, non interactive, non binding, contiguous, shapeless, long lasting and at least half the thermal value or less of the fundamental particles (Dark Matter).

    In Astronomy, as in all sciences, one can detect an object in one of two ways: either by observing it directly, or observing the effect that it exerts on more visible bodies. The existence of potential rest energy (PRE) is almost undetectable because they harbor such incredibly tiny energy unit structure.
    Potential rest energy is a hypothetical generic term though not visible to our technology their presence is inferred by their influence on visible celestial bodies in the cosmos. There is a growing consensus in the astronomical community that most of the energy in the our universe is in the form of dark energy that I refer to as (potential rest energy)

    A more compelling argument for (PRE), Let us hypothesize, why not saturate the entire greater universe with PRE. and construct a single fluid medium. It is only logical to assume that the local universe was created from a very few varying quantum thermal unit values. The evidence from observations of the universe point to everything as being influenced by thermal information.

    At this point in time cosmologists don't know what PRE is. With understanding the movements of celestial objects, great strides can be taken in the comprehension of the universe. The nature of PRE and its abundance, are crucial questions in modern cosmology. Since an insignificant percentage of all matter is visible, it is therefore logical to assume the possibility that these nonvisual constituents will determine the type of universe and how it performs.

    Potential rest energy and dark matter ubiquitous and very efficacious, what fundamental synergy do they posit? The deeper we delve the more intriquing we find this hypothesis of complexity wrapped in simplicity This potential rest energy is found not only in space but contiguous with macro and dark matter in every facet of thermal interaction.

    Why such an abundance of these two ingredients in the universe? One player in possesion of 67% of the total energy and the second about 30 + % as dark matter.

    This begs a question; why are the galaxies not falling in on themselves?

    In order to proceed from this point can we posit bouyancy of all macro matter as a theory and assume that the universe is a quiescent fluid. This assumption that little conduction of energy and almost no viscosity maybe questionable on small scales but taken as a unit, the universe under observations behaves very much like a quiescent fluid.

    This causative agent is emerging as key factor to revive the "cosmological constant theory". The existence of potential rest energy as a dominant basic constituent of the "greater universe" revives Ienstien's discarded hunch of the "cosmological constant", maybe not exactly as he envisioned. Nevertheless this mysterious force is welcome news, it is highly improbable that a local universe will expand and turn us into dark matter nor will it collapse and crush us but possiible. This energy force assures us that omega one and the 3 D shapeless greater universe is equal.

    With the emergence of potential rest energy a draft guesstimate of the universal total volume of these three constituents (pre +dm +macro m) = (omega) to determine its size now is a possibility.

    I assume without proof that the universe is the same volume now as it was x trillion years ago, as being self-evident. What would be a logical cause that follows physics for expansion or loss of volume if energy can not be destroyed or created? The conjecture that the universe is infinite would postulate the genesis of matter as a hypothetical, potential generating thermal value units would be spread far too sparse to coalesce. not a viable option.

    Potential rest energy is the first order (in value?), more stable and long lasting than dark matter particles. As a first magnitude in size they are unable to accrete thermal information and this inabliity to transmit information renders them ineffectual to expansion or contraction.

    I would prefer to call them potential rest energy,I extrapolate their existence as quiescent,almost zero motion and these contiguous constituents fill all space and permeate all matter. With this domination of 67 % of energy may posit a thought - how is expansion or contraction possible? With just 32 % of dark + 1 % macro matter as active agents. Can the rearrangement of matter structures be absorbed into a cosmological constant?

    As humbling as it may sound these expansion theories may be regarded as regional phenomenons, as we observe regional generation and atrophy of galactic cycles. We may not even have ventured outside of our sector which commands at least 15 to 20 billion light years omni - directional. What does that say about our sector are we the new kid in the neighbourhood?

    Light like sound or water for propagation of motion needs a medium to transfers thermal information (energy) from the source.Potential rest energy being the first order of magnitude in size and unable to accrete thermal information this inabliity to transmit information renders them ineffectual. This may limit our ability to view light from our sector of the universe only.

    The fact that parts of the universe do display expansion does not proclaim that the universe can not be static.

    more on dark matter by sam sade

    http://ca.geocities.com/Samsade@rogers.com/


     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 3
    Votes: 4


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "dark energy" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.