ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 114 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

NASA BPP - Good Riddance
Posted on Monday, August 19, 2002 @ 14:52:00 UTC by vlad

Testimonials M.G. Whitney aka Mat writes: I thought it was interesting that the BPP site listed the types of correspondance they have received, they even bothered to list several excerpted emails from "delusional" folks.



Yes some are delusional, but some are merely unbusinesslike. They themselves admit that valid ideas come from "crazy" sources...besides who are they to say whether or not I channel Einstein or have been to the moon!

I was honored to see my email excerpted in this list. I would rather present myself as insane - insanity being the clothing around an idea - than BE another number crunching, dime-a-dozen, poindexters who think rocketry is still the best way or who are afraid citing GOD as a source would destroy their careers...
NASA BPP was a noble idea at first, but I can't reconcile any of it with the knowledge taken from Disclosure Project. Is it all really SO compartmentalised that Marc Millis was unaware his peers had AG figured out decades ago?
Speaking of Dr. Greer, couldn't SEAS back engineer something back engineered? Or get ahold of one of the persons who did the back engineering for the ARV's? Maybe they are really under close guard?
The University Pencil Pushers like Sarfatti aren't going to breakthrough anything and we delusionals are immediatly dismissed so...who'll get the recognition? I'd rather see a rogue inventor like me get into consensus reality rather than a rogue faceless R+D Skunkworks fella.
Goodbye NASA BPP...this stuff should be privatized anyway...Lets GO SEAS!
This dichotomy in background and approach to understanding the GUT is really fascinating. I'm putting my bets on me actually. I at least know that my lack of experience with equations and related squiggly lines IS AN ASSET. Less time being a calculator more time seeing scale invariant self-similarity in electron/galaxy morphology.
Those old schoolers will NEVER admit that psychedelic drugs will reveal FAR MORE about the architecture of free space than any text book. That creative breakthroughs come from DEVIATIONS in normal thought should be self evident, and yet utilizing drugs for this purpose is frowned upon.

Dogma in science is just more religion...
So I can't contain my zeal for the prospect of reducing my inertial mass in a typical business letter...SO WHAT MARC?
Yeah you laugh at me and claim I taint the whole scene but obviously someone higher up cut your budget because they thought you were a joke as well...like I said about Dennis Lee, sometimes you have to exploit the CRAZINESS not distance it from your subjective notion of "CRAZY"

Stop being apologetic about the metaphysical aspects, stop getting your info just from specialists, invite a few of your favorite delusionals to the events and see what happens.

Mathew "Yes I AM" Whitney


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Testimonials
· News by vlad


Most read story about Testimonials:
Dr. Eugene Mallove is dead


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"NASA BPP - Good Riddance" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: NASA BPP - Good Riddance (Score: 1)
by Anonymous on Monday, August 19, 2002 @ 22:05:00 UTC
vlad (vlad@zpenergy) writes: Famous Spanish painter Salvador Dali said : "The only difference between a madman and me is that I am not a madman". Does it matter that he was a madman or a genius? Does it matter that his creative genius/madness came from alcohol or mushrooms or sex or prayer or green tea or his mustache vibrating at the ZPE frequency? I personally don't care205he did something with his "delusional" ideas and his work makes me and many others happy, and that's what matters!

What many like you Matty forget is that, to paraphrase Mark Twain, a man with a new idea is "delusional" until he succeeds. To succeed, if you're an inventor, you have to invent. If you only talk/write about "fantastic" inventions, you may succeed as a science-fiction writer. Think about it205the more outrageous and disruptive your inventions are, the more you scare the money, the less chance for you to succeed as a real world inventor. On top of that (I've read your book) your inventions are too complex technologically, which scares the s..t out of the possible "left over" investors, still lured by the potential returns. In other words, your inventions may work very well but, I bet the group of physicist in England working to incorporate the crop circle designs (mathematics) in a functional simple ZPE tapping experiment would have more success with getting Mark's attention and money (if anything left) despite the fact that the crop cirles are supposed to be made by aliens/Gaea conscience or crazy pranksters!

We should always remember this: A single successful and replicable experiment can always falsify an entire theory or model. But no theory or model, regardless of how beautiful or universally believed, can falsify a single successful and replicable experiment that contradicts that theory or model (Tom Bearden).
But hey, don’t worry ..be happy; if no one is pissed-off with you, then you are dead but just haven't figured it out yet:-).




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.