Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 148 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream! Posted on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 09:54:29 UTC by vlad nanotech writes: Check out this Christian Science Monitor article about cold fusion and how new experiments are vindicating it in the eyes of the mainstream. http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0606/p25s01-stss.html?s=u "A very reputable, very careful group of scientists at the University of Los Angeles (Brian Naranjo, Jim Gimzewski, Seth Putterman) has initiated a fusion reaction using a laboratory device that's not much bigger than a breadbox, and works at roughly room temperature. This time, it looks like the real thing." My question: Can just the fact that such a thing exists, and will be accepted by the mainstream established physicists, lead to a tremendous drop in oil stocks?   Login Nickname Password Security Code: Type Security Code Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. Related Links · More about Science · News by vlad Most read story about Science: 100 miles on 4 ounces of water? Article Rating Average Score: 3 Votes: 2 Please take a second and vote for this article: Options   Printer Friendly "Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream!" | Login/Create an Account | 8 comments | Search Discussion The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream! (Score: 1) by ElectroDynaCat on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 13:24:51 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Its my opinion that in fact, we are very close to a breakthrough in energy production from what could be termed "non conventional" techniques involving the interaction of accelerated nuclei inside a crystaline lattice. There exists a effect called "channelling" in which high speed nuclei confine themselves automatically to small areas inside body centered and hexagonal crystal structures. This confinement greatly increases the probability of two nuclei colliding and fusing inside the crystal matrix. When cold fusion was first reported, it was thought that channelling was responsible for what was observed as excess energy. Palladium does possess a hexagonal crystal structure. No work was pursued in this area. Hot Fusion still controlled the research avenues. After 50 years of research into hot fusion and no results, one would think other methods would at least get some attention. Finally its happenning. Re: Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream! by nanotech on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 15:40:34 UTC Re: Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream! by ElectroDynaCat on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 19:36:46 UTC Not Cold Fusion (Score: 1) by Rock_nj on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 15:38:30 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) The article is interesting and it certainly is another indication that amazing things are possible with table top fusion, but it's not cold fusion in the classical sense. This experiment did not replicate the Pons and Fleischmann cold fusion idea. This is a replication of "hot fusion" just in a much smaller apparatus than was thought possible. Just setting the record straight, as the CSM is confusing the subject of cold fusion. Nanotech (Score: 1) by Rock_nj on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 15:46:34 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) There is no reason to think that oil stocks would affected by this development. Even the scientists behind it aren't predicting a big energy breakthrough. It's not even close to breaking even. However, there has been substantial progress in classical cold fusion, and a breakthrough might come any month now, especially from Asia. There is one company with a South Korean patent called http://www.iesiusa.com/ that apparently has an imment cold fusion commercialization technology announcement. That's the word in the Net. For the lastest on cold fusion, see the interviews at: http://www.newenergytimes.com/Conversations/conversations.htm Re: Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream! (Score: 1) by Kadamose on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 21:06:03 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Cold Fusion is great and all...but it still is nowhere near as great, nor as important, as Zero Point Energy. Isn't Cold Fusion just another form of Sonoluminescence? If that's the case, then it's not really fusion at all...the bubbles are actually tapping the zero point field, and that is where the massive amounts of energy that no one can explain comes from in these experiments. Re: Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream! by Rock_nj on Sunday, June 12, 2005 @ 05:10:31 UTC Re: Cold Fusion Closer To Acceptance By Mainstream! (Score: 1) by Koen on Tuesday, June 14, 2005 @ 02:23:10 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla Philo Farnsworth is the only inventor who build a self-sustained fusion reactor, see http://www.farnovision.com/chronicles/fusion/vassilatos.html and scroll down to "SUSTAINED FUSION REACTION". I have also examined the Farnsworth patents, and indeed Farnsworth used the phrase 'self-sustained reaction'. I do not doubt Farnsworth's claim, since he was an outstanding technician, inventor and scientist of rare quality. It's about time ITT. returns this stolen invention (the Farnsworth fusor) to the world of reseach, for instance to MIT.

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.