ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 121 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Viable carbon free energy
Posted on Wednesday, July 06, 2005 @ 20:46:44 UTC by vlad

General ...The US emphasis on technology in fighting climate change has received backing from an unexpected quarter in London. While reiterating support for a carbon tax, which is anathema to Washington, the committee on economic affairs of the House of Lords said the world's most industrialised nations should tackle climate change by investing up to $400bn on developing new energy sources, equivalent to what the US spent on the Apollo moon landings.

"While the Kyoto protocol should, in principle, encourage technological change, we are not convinced that it has sufficient focus on this central issue," said the committee of the upper chamber of the British parliament.

"We argue that the present 'more of the same' approach, relying exclusively on targets for emissions reductions, may not tackle the global warming threat."

The report cites estimates from the International Energy Agency that $400bn expenditure would be needed if carbon-free energy was to become economically viable through alternative energy sources such as solar photovoltaics, biomass and carbon sequestration.

Source: http://news.ft.com/cms/s/a07f59b6-edbb-11d9-9ff5-00000e2511c8.html

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about General
· News by vlad


Most read story about General:
Z machine melts diamond to puddle


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Viable carbon free energy" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Viable carbon free energy (Score: 1)
by malc on Thursday, July 07, 2005 @ 00:18:51 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
IF (big if) an alternate non polluting energy source was developed within the next 10-20 years this still doesn't address the problem of global warming. There is already a couple of decades of warming in the system and that assumes ZERO co2 increase from today ! If we assume the US continues with its attitude and thus results in most other nations being less aggressive in their pursit of cleaner technologies plus the vast increase from China and India....kiss your ass goodbye even if we zerod everything in 2020. You have to both reduce emissions and develop new technology now.

There is a trend in the estimates for global change which is that all estimates to date have seriously underestimated the magnitude of the change. Even the previous adjustments have to be adjusted even more. It's scary stuff if you take the time to investigate.

I don't believe anything will happen until crop failure, water shortage and weather disruption becomes so bleedin obvious by just walking down the street. By then it's too late.

The world will change and survival will depend on where you are and adaptation to change with water and food sources being critical.



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.