ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 101 guest(s) and 1 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (July 7, 2017 - July 9, 2017) Energy Science & Technology Conference
  • (July 28, 2017 - July 29, 2017) COFE-9

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    Energy Science

    Energy21

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs

    KeelyNet

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.

    Panacea-BOCAF

    QVac_Eng

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    Alternative Energy News
    KeelyNet_News
    NextEnergyNews
    PESWiki/News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy2000
    Free_Energy
    Greenglow
    JLNLabs
    KeelyNet
    NuEnergy
    OverUnity
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Sweet-VTA
    Tapten
    Tomorrow-energy
    Vortex
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine
    radioioAmbient

    On the nonlocality of gravity energy 1
    Posted on Saturday, August 27, 2005 @ 17:48:05 EDT by vlad

    Science Dr. Jack Sarfatti writes (not for general public): Any attempt, like Yilmaz's, to localize the classical vacuum energy of the pure gravity field violates the local equivalence principle and is in contradiction with Einstein's theory of General Relativity. One can define a covariant local gravity stress-energy tensor in a classical vacuum (i.e. vanishing zero point energy density and equal and opposite pressure). It will be exactly zero. However, you cannot compute the total energy-momentum of the gravity field at asymptotically flat infinity with that covariant tensor.

    The use of a coordinate-dependent pseudo-tensor is completely physical because in order to make a g-force one must use a non-gravity force. The g-force detector is, therefore, not on a time-like geodesic. Consequently, the non-vanishing value of the pseudo-tensor is precisely from the work done and stresses induced by the external non-gravity forces on the detectors.

    Mathematically the argument goes like this. Assume 1915 GR with vanishing torsion. The Bianchi identities then ensure that

    Guv^;v = 0

    where ;v is the gauge covariant derivative from the local gauging of the global translation group T4 down to the Diff(4) local group of general coordinate transformations. This local gauging gives a non- trivial warp part compensating gauge potential 1-form B to the Einstein-Cartan tetrad that in local frame-invariant form can be written as

    e = 1 + B

    The Levi-Civita connection is derived from this e. When there is torsion we have

    e' = e + S

    where S is the torsion 1-form

    S = De = de + WΛe

    W is the spin-connection 1-form

    The gauge-covariant derivative with respect to e' is then ;;

    The generalized Bianchi identity then gives the "teleparallel"

    Guv^;;v = 0

    Note that the metric field g is still bilinear in e not e' as demanded by the Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP).

    Therefore, now the original Bianchi identity is violated with

    Guv^;v ~ cross-terms S with B and S^2 terms =/= 0

    B is ~ the disclination defect density and S is ~ the dislocation defect density in the vacuum condensate Goldstone phase (see Hagen Kleinert's home page for curvature as disclination and torsion as dislocation without any mention of vacuum condensate however).

    OK, but going back to 1915 GR, with zero torsion

    Guv^;v = 0

    Implies that

    Tuv^;v = 0

    The above equation means

    Tu^v(Matter)^,v + tuv(Matter-Gravity)^,v = 0

    Where ,v is the flat space-time partial derivative and

    tuv(Matter-Geometry) is the pseudo-tensor that rattles a lot of people like Yilmaz and Zielinski.

    tuv(Matter-Gravity)^,v consists of terms like (LC)ul^wT^lw

    Where (LC) is the connection that is only non-zero when non-gravity forces do work on the detectors pushing them off the natural timelike geodesics in curved space-time. That is (LC) is the "Gravity" and T is the "Matter" in the "Matter-Gravity" coupling that is the pseudo- tensor.

    The "nonlocality of the gravity energy" means that the above pseudo- tensor vanishes in Local Inertial Frames (LIFs), but does not vanish in Local Non-Inertial Frames (LNIFS). The LNIFs only exist because of work done by non-gravity forces on the detectors. Nevertheless, under certain conditions, gravity waves will propagate energy-momentum to infinity causing detectors to click with irreversible generation of heat. The background space-time is of course flat in this asymptotic region that is like in S-Matrix theory in quantum scattering.

    To be continued.

    (See attached poll on the top right of the page -Vlad)

     
    Article's Poll
    Do you have the math/physics level to understand this post?

    Yes
    No


    [ Results | Polls ]

    Votes: 22
    Comments: 0

    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 4.66
    Votes: 3


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "On the nonlocality of gravity energy 1" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: On the nonlocality of gravity energy 1 (Score: 1)
    by irjsi on Saturday, August 27, 2005 @ 22:14:52 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Hello Vlad,
    A. I thought you were taking the weekend off, and
    B. I remain convinced that there must be a better way of providing energy to the rapidly expanding numbers of 'humans with disposable income' on the Planet.
    C. As a member of 'the general public',
    I ask: Is there a 'thesauraus' of mathematical terms and symbols available to the general public? (^) ( ; ) ? ? ?

    ie.
    ( The above equation means

    "Tu^v(Matter)^,v + tuv(Matter-Gravity)^,v = 0

    Where ,v is the flat space-time partial derivative and

    tuv(Matter-Geometry) is the pseudo-tensor that rattles a lot of people like Yilmaz and Zielinski.

    tuv(Matter-Gravity)^,v consists of terms like (LC)ul^wT^lw" ) ? ? ?

    An Engineer (related to me), and now deceased, was convinced that nuclear power is 'safe'.
    My response to him: "If the only solution to the energy problems of the World is 'nuclear'; I would prefer to turn-off the lights!"
    Because:
    The 'nuclear priesthood' has yet to safely sequester the first ounce of nuclear waste. And the 'nuclear priesthood has opted to increase the 'safe' dose of radiation from, as I recall: allowable dosage to increase from about 12 rems? to 350 rems?
    Do not recall the source! Had to do with not guaranteeing security/exposure of nuclear waste after the 10 millenia required to detect meaningful reduction/attrition of radiation.

    I remain convinced that there must be a better way of providing energy to the rapidly expanding numbers of 'humans with disposable income' on the Planet.

    Roy Stewart
    Phoenix AZ



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.