ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 222 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Homer Simpson at the Patent Office
Posted on Monday, November 04, 2002 @ 21:06:00 UTC by vlad

Legal Yes folks, that is Graham P. Collins' conclusion in his second article in the Staking Claims series, "Selling the Free Lunch - Perpetual motion has changed its name but not its methods", published in the November issue of the American Scientist:

We have to thank him for not proposing more Charles Duell-s, who, as the U.S. Commissioner of Patents in 1899, made the famous statement: "Everything that can be invented has been invented." Here are my two cents on these articles...(more)



Tom Bearden, the "old retired dog" (how he likes to call himself these days), must have scared some powerful forces to death to have such a concentrated effort on preventing a harmless patent on his MEG! Let's examine more closely some relevant paragraphs (in ) from these articles:

The author gives the impression that only "patents such as...", but in reality any patent is not a certification that the device will work. Then he admits what it is still a reasonable working procedure:


Makes sense: The goal behind any patent office is (and should be) to encourage invention and innovation by protecting an inventor's IP--the only way a civilized society can rapidly progress. Revolutionary inventions, such as the MEG, should be of particular interest even if (from what we know now) they might have only a small chance of success. But the payoff for that small chance is so huge that we, as a society, should not miss it.

Mr. Collins, since you write for the "American Scientist" you should know better. The energy is very well known to science - what we (at least most of us) don't know (yet) is how to harness it. But some may have found a way, and that's the role of the patent office: to find that important person and help him/her get this crucial invention to the world, because we don't have the luxury of time anymore. And most of all, if there is a prototype (such as the MEG) the patent office should have a qualified lab ready to test the device IMMEDIATELY and for free (their fees are ridiculously high anyway).

Yes sir, it turns out that the inventors are fully qualified scientists with new ideas about the physical world we live in. They know all about the laws of thermodynamics, about the nonlinear oscillation theory and higher group symmetry electrodynamics. Tapping energy from the vacuum is not easy; otherwise even the vocal skeptics would have done it by now (temptation for money is bigger than pride). If it were simple electromagnetics or ordinary electrical engineering, it would not have taken Tom's group 10 years to do it with three Ph.D's and two experienced engineers working on it. Or you think, Mr. Collins, the science and the final truth stops with Bob Park or James Randi? They have a lot of legitimate scam artists to deal with who put on "public appearances to drum up investment money or to sell franchises and making it onto TV news shows with gullible hosts." But unfortunately they, CSICOP, etc., don't realize that this is different, beyond them, and at least they should give these researchers the benefit of a doubt. But that's not easy either, because of other powerful forces at play. Yes, as incredible as it may be that somebody could oppose bringing of free clean energy to this world in desperate need of it, there are humans and organizations out there capable of doing that, to maintain their privileged status quo (power/control/money).

Wake up Graham, the guided scientific advance is also transforming the world into a living hell: hot, with no breathable air and drinkable water, with poisoned soil and weekly plant and animal species extinction, with rampant poverty and violence and cancer killing even children in the most "advanced" nations. THESE are contradicting the most fundamental laws of Nature!

But here is probably the real reason behind these series of articles:

In other words, we want incentives (public money) and time (the inventors can wait) for the debunkers and lawyers to debunk (I assume challenge) the "science" (??) of an "erroneous" (already found guilty!?) patent in court (remember Charles Darwin trial?). And that is, of course, to protect the gullible from the scamsters and the most fundamental laws of Nature (like somebody could change them anyway?). If common sense is so common, why do so few have it?

Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. said: "If we are to survive, we must have ideas, vision, and courage." I see none of them in these American Scientist articles.

Vlad

P.S.
"Professor Goddard.does not know the relation of action to reaction205he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in our high schools" [New York Times, January 13, 1920]. In 1969, the day after Apollo 11 left earth orbit for the moon, the New York Times published an apology for printing derisive comments about the inventor's theory. It took New York Times almost 50 years to do the right thing. But the damage was done and we'll never know the consequences.


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Legal
· News by vlad


Most read story about Legal:
Formation of Archer Energy Systems, Inc.


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Homer Simpson at the Patent Office" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Homer Simpson at the Patent Office (Score: 1)
by Anonymous on Friday, November 08, 2002 @ 16:13:00 UTC
ROBERT PIERRE (RKNYUM@PIONEERNET.NET) writes:
Dear MR. VLAD,
I wish to congratulate you on a very powerful article. I follow your postings from time to time and try to keep up to speed on the latest and greatest developments in ENERGY applications.

It is obvious that many reputations will be at stake if(the cat is let out the bag)so to speak, that we as a society are enabled to extract ENERGY from nature as simply as we pick apples off trees.

I see history repeating itself for free "ENERGY researches". GALILEO GALILEI'S claims was as extraordinary in his time as free ENERGY is in ours and we see what happened to him.
', 'Most of the estalished institutions already have a monopoly on power and we see the worst in human traits manifested in order that they may keep it like that, but then you already knew this.

I would like to encourage you to continue all your hard work on this website in getting information out to the people so that together we may keep up the fight against these self centered, vision-less and corrupted individuals that would ignore a simple fact...

Nature herself, through the inventor/innovator is attempting to save herself from the unslaught of man and less he shall heed his wayward ways, our solar system will contain within it, two dead planets that seemed to have once thrived with life.Again, thank you!

', '

RESPECTFULLY
ROBERT L. PIERRE




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.