Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 296 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science


    ECW E-Cat World


    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times



    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Torsion Physics
    Posted on Tuesday, December 06, 2005 @ 00:16:14 GMT by vlad

    Science Tim Ventura writes: Dear All:

    I've attached our latest for you -- a written interview with Dr. Gennady Shipov on Torsion Physics & Breakthrough Propulsion. As you may know, I spent a good part of last year learning about Einstein's Unified Field Theory under the expert guidance of John Dering & Jim Corum -- since then, I've been trying to follow the breadcrumbs to learn a bit more about modern approaches to this field of endeavor, which brought me to the idea of Torsion Physics.

    From what I've learned, Torsion Physics is important in that it's not only an extension of the work left unfinished by Einstein, but it also provides some powerful conceptual models with the potential to explain many of the anomalies that we continuously hear about in the AG community. Admittedly, I'm no expert on this topic, but Shipov certainly is, and he explains it in detail to help showcase some of the conceptual models that he's developing.

    Science doesn't just disappear, and I've been plagued over the last year by the question of what happened to the Unified Field Theory that Einstein spent the last 30 years of his life working on. Even if unfinished, I'd hoped to see some modern approach capitalize on what he started -- and I think that Torsion Physics is possibly what I'd been looking for all along.


    Tim Ventura
    Phone: 425-820-5675
    Mobile: 425-260-4175

    Sarfatti’s StarDrive
    Jack Sarfatti on Torsion Physics
    By Tim Ventura & Dr. a Jack Sarfatti, November 27th, 2005

    [You can also download Tim's interviews with Dr. Gennady Shipov and Dr. Jack Sarfatti (on the same subject) from our Downloads/ZPE_related section. Vlad]



    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad

    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 2

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Very Good


     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

    "Torsion Physics" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Torsion Physics (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Tuesday, December 06, 2005 @ 22:19:20 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Dr. Jack Sarfatti writes to Tim Ventura: Paul's torsion paper on your website is very inaccurate and misleading. He has Robert Forward doing Einstein's calculation of the advance of the perihelion of Mercury for example!

    I will write a good-humored "collegial" "respectful" impersonal constructive set of corrections of Murad's paper. You can check it with any other physicist like Richard Hammond in Fargo who is the leading American expert on torsion physics. See what he says about Murad's torsion paper as it is now on your website.

    Paul should contact everyone in USG he talked to negatively about Ken Shoulders explaining that it had nothing to do with Ken at all, but was a personal matter between him and me. As it is Ken has a case against Paul for damages. Fortunately for Paul, Ken is a Southern Gentleman with a lot of class.

    Re: Torsion Physics (Score: 1)
    by Nexperia on Thursday, December 22, 2005 @ 04:22:09 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Hi Tim,

    I think you should be aware of this already, but Prof. Myron Evans has been finishing the work on UFT from Einstein and Cartan based on the premise that electromagnetism is torsion of spacetime.
    All information can be found at these websites:

    http://www.aias.us/ [www.aias.us]
    http://www.atomicprecision.com/ [www.atomicprecision.com]

    Although I admire the work he has put in to comprehense it is difficult, even for a schooled EE as I am. I think the equations are very complex and hard to translate to quantifiable numbers on effects that he claims are proving the theory.
    I personally believe that ultimately the goal should be a simple solution. E.g. there have been many great minds in history that claim that gravity is nothing else than a side effect of a difference in electromagnetic potential. An interesting worked out one can be found here:

    http://jlnlabs.imars.com/vsg/synergetics.pdf [jlnlabs.imars.com]

    The author claims that gravitation potential is the square of the propagation velocity of EM waves in a given medium that is empty of matter. Althus calculating he shows that the speed of light in 'vacuum' would be 0.1m/s faster than inside matter on earth. Being this small difference it would give the appearence that c is a universal constant.




    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.