ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 295 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    A Note on the Law of Electrodynamics
    Posted on Thursday, December 15, 2005 @ 22:05:38 GMT by vlad

    Science "A Note on the Law of Electrodynamics" by Paulo and Alexandra Correa, brings into focus the insufficiency of Ampère's Law of Electrodynamics and the superiority of Aspden's proposed law (see the companion feature: Harold Aspden's recent note "A Problem in Plasma Science"), when it comes to addressing the manifestations of anomalous cathode reaction forces in open circuits and in circuits closed by charge flows associated with charge-carriers of different mass.

    It also presents a fundamental aetherometric correction to the basic errors in electrodynamics that have prevented the latter from reaching a consistent and predictive understanding of charge interactions.

    Source: http://www.aetherometry.com/publications/direct/Note_on_Electrodynamics.pdf

     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 0
    Votes: 0

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "A Note on the Law of Electrodynamics" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: A Note on the Law of Electrodynamics (Score: 1)
    by Koen on Monday, January 22, 2007 @ 01:30:20 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
    On page four Paulo quotes Aspden who describes that Maxwell considered an extra term (v.r)v' .  Aspden did not describe which force law this term should be added, but it is probably the Grassmann force law of current elements that can be derived directly from Maxwell's field theory.

    Now, Aspden describes "Maxwell's considerations" about the sign (or even extra factor) of this extra term  (v.r)v':    "Maxwell realized that this term could have any factor, positive or negative, large or small, (etc....)."
    Aspden then adds a factor  m/m'  where m and m' are the masses of negatively an positively charged particles.

    This is NOT correct.  Newton's third law requires that the factor and sign is +1,  and is not at all arbitrary.  This has been pointed out already by the great Stefan Marinov. Stefan realised that the Grassmann force law does NOT satisfy Newton's third law ( F,action =  -F,reaction), and was able to fix this by adding the extra term  +1(v.r)v'  that accounts for longitudinal forces.

    Recently, the mysterious "St. Alban" has send me a derivation of the Grassmann law + extra term +1(v.r)v'   (which he called 'Tait law')  in quaternion notation. I checked his derivations and these are correct.
    Next I realised that my generalised Maxwell theory with extra scalar field S can be used to derive the 'Tait force law'  that also allows for longitudinal forces between current elements.


    Conclusion: Correa adopted Aspden's incorrect force law (that has the incorrect factor  m/m'), and Graneau adopted Ampere's force law in order to explain the longitudinal "Ampere" forces.  But the correct law should be the Grassmann law + extra term  +1(v.r)v'  as already pointed out by Stefan Marinov. I already found the field theory that can be used to derive Stefan Marinov's force law as a special case, that also satisfies Newton's third law.

    For closed circuits Ampere's force law and Marinov's force law predict the same results, but for open circuits that show longitudinal forces these laws predict different results.

    Ampere's force law can be derived from Weber's potential as a special case of Weber's force law, but this theoretical background simply does not predict electromagnetic waves.
    My theory does also predict electromagnetic wave (as generalisation of the Maxwell theory), and also the longitudinal forces and longitudinal electric field waves (etc..) as already found in experiments.

    Thusfar Correa did not refered to my theory, and forgets all about Newton's third law. I don't feel much for emailing Correa directly, because of his angry attitude (faul language and name calling)  which he showed in an email addressed to me. Again, his mistake.

    Koen





     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.