ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 267 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The Energy of Motion: a New Explanation
    Posted on Friday, April 14, 2006 @ 11:43:00 GMT by vlad

    Science randy writes:
    If we are ever going to harness the limitless energy of the universe, we need to better understand the workings of nature, and especially the atom. Theories and formulas abound about the nature of the universe. Many are complicated and involve extra dimensions and difficult math. Some of these theories come from the most brilliant minds we have on the planet, but are not easily understood. We desperately need a new theory of motion, not to give us the ultimate answer to life, the universe, and everything, but to make us think in simple terms about the complexity of the energy of motion. Energy is sea of motion, but what is it that gives the electron its continuous motion?



    A few weeks ago, I wrote the article, "Quantum Tunneling: a New View of the Atom". Although quantum tunneling must be part of the answer, it is not the absolute answer. I believe in my heart and soul that the energy of the atom is due to the effect of atomic polarization of the dielectric field, or capacitance between these poles. The energy of the atom must be a constant charging and discharging of the dielectric sea of energy that is formed by orbiting electrons and the confinement conditions thus created.


    I believe that electrons are accelerated and decelerated by the charging and discharging of the dielectric medium between magnetic poles. The magnetic poles of the atom act as magnetic accelerators. So, the atom is a kind of cyclotron. The atom is recycling energy and being supplied with new energy through contact with the Zero Point Electromagnetic Field.



    In order to express a simple formula that would describe this energy of electron motion, we will need for the symbols of the formula to have multiple meanings, and to lead us to think ever more deeply about these meanings. I propose that we use the most basic electronic symbols for our formula and attach multiple meanings to these symbols.


    When we talk about motion or the energy of electrons we use the terms velocity and voltage or "v". We can use this one symbol to express both these terms.


    To express the charging and discharging of the field and the accelerating force of tunneling, we can use the symbol "S". "S" is the symbol most commonly used to express the magnetic field and we can attach to this symbol the meaning "Speed" to express the tunneling or acceleration of the electron.


    Finally, There is always a release of energy from the resistance of an electron to being either accelerated or decelerated. Thus, we use the symbol "R".


    When an electron is accelerated it emits photons, and when it is then suddenly decelerated, it emits microwave radiation. So our symbol "R" has special significance as different forms of emitted radiation. Again, our symbol has a dual meaning. So, our formula of: v = S + R is simple, and easy. However, we must use our intellect to attach all the nuances and meanings that can come from its consideration.


    Our universe if filled with electromagnetic radiation of different frequencies. There are photons, and a lot of microwave radiation. Could it be that this radiation comes from the acceleration and deceleration of electrons in atoms? Perhaps this is so. At any rate, present atomic theory may be completely wrong.


    Personally, I do not believe that we need to consider extra dimensions to understand the atom. Except for the principle of quantum tunneling, the physics of the atom may be quite simple and easy for us to understand. Our present atomic theory is admittedly flawed with the use of probability waves as an explanation of electron position. Using the term "probability waves" may describe the position of electrons, but it does not explain the motion of electrons. More likely, electron tunneling is taking place, and we are not aware of the quantum leap that electrons continually take.


    I hope that this explanation helps us to make better sense of the atom. For if we can understand the workings of the atom, we can develop more efficient energy systems and solve the energy dilemma. At any rate, the value of any idea is found in the useful devices we make from its understanding. Even if we are wrong, someone else can point out the flaws.

    We always learn something from sharing new ideas.


    From the desk of Ralph Randolph Sawyer



     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 0
    Votes: 0

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "The Energy of Motion: a New Explanation" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: The Energy of Motion: a New Explanation (Score: 1)
    by dfwrunner on Monday, April 17, 2006 @ 11:06:17 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    This article seems to be implying that there is some difference (other than frequency) between "photons" and "microwave radiation".  Microwaves are photons too.



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.