ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 102 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Energy Storage in the Background Electric Sea
Posted on Monday, May 01, 2006 @ 07:13:41 UTC by rob

Science FDT writes:
Dear Sir,
            There has been a considerable degree of speculation over the years, that the energy stored in a magnetic field is kinetic energy with a rotational aspect, whereas on the other hand, the energy stored in a capacitor shows all the hallmarks of being potential energy of a similar nature to the energy stored in a mechanical spring. For full details, see this web link,

                      http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe3.pdf

Most physics teachers are familiar with the analogies that exist between the three important components of an electric circuit, on the one hand, and certain aspects of mechanical and aeronautical engineering on the other hand.



The electrical inductor corresponds to mechanical flywheels, the electrical capacitor corresponds to the mechanical spring, and electrical resistance corresponds to air resistance. As such, the mathematical treatment of any of these analogous pairs is identical, and it is simply a case of substituting the corresponding quantities.

Inductance L corresponds to inertial mass m, and perhaps more accurately to moment of inertia I. Electrical current I corresponds to velocity v, capacitance C corresponds to the reciprocal of the spring constant 1/k, and electrical displacement x corresponds to mechanical displacement x. However, we are about to discuss the fact that electrical displacement is erroneously treated in mathematical calculations as being electrical charge Q.

What makes the capacitor circuit fundamentally different from the inductor circuit is the fact that in the capacitor circuit, the electric current does not have freedom of passage, and it grinds to a halt in a static potential energy state, whereas in the inductor circuit, the electric current has total freedom of passage, and hence on reaching equilibrium, it will continue to flow in a steady state, surrounded by a static magnetic field.

We aim now to try and establish what is the common origin behind both these mechanisms for storing electrical energy. We find that the common origin is an electric sea of rotating electron-positron dipoles, and that in the dynamic state, the two separate theories of linear polarization and rotational magnetization blend together into one unified theory, governed by two laws of electromagnetic induction, which themselves can be combined to derive the electromagnetic wave equation.

It further follows that all matters to do with current in a capacitor circuit, refer only to displacement current, and that we are forced to abandon the traditional notion that electric charge builds up inside the plates of a capacitor.

                                   Yours sincerely
                                      David Tombe


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by rob


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 4
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Energy Storage in the Background Electric Sea" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Gravity is Negative Electricity (Score: 1)
by FDT on Friday, November 03, 2006 @ 17:22:05 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
The substantial amendments that have been brought about to the web link,

http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe3.pdf

as result of the realization that polarization and magnetization are not necessarily linked in the dynamic state, along with the realization that all matter must be intrinsically negative,

http://www.wbwbain.net/science/tombe6.pdf
 
means that electric charge can accumulate on the plates of a capacitor and cause displacement current, without upsetting the stability of the metal structure, and without causing any magnetic effect.

As such, the last sentence in the above submission has been totally revoked.

Yours sincerely, David Tombe



Re: Energy Storage in the Background Electric Sea (Score: 1)
by FDT on Saturday, October 28, 2006 @ 09:53:37 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
The web link in this article http://www.wbabin.net/science.tombe3.pdf has been substantially updated to take account of a number of realizations.

(1) That the energy stored in a charged capacitor is actually kinetic energy. This is due to the fact that centrifugal pressure in the electric sea would prevent the orbits of the individual electrons and positrons in the rotating electron positron dipoles, from fully elongating into ellipses when subjected to a polarizing electric field.

(2) That all atomic and molecular matter nomally deemed to be neutral is in fact negatively charged. This means that electrons and positrons are free to move around inside a metal without upsetting the stability of the metal lattice. See

http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe6.pdf

(3) That displacement current is not directly involved in electromagnetic radiation and that electromagnetic radiation is a purely gyroscopic phenomenon. The apparent coincidence which links Coulomb's law and linear polarization to Ampère’s circuital law, via Gauss's law can be explained by a parallel situation involving the Angular force ∂A/dt and magnetization.

Yours sincerely, David Tombe



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.