 |
There are currently, 188 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention
Posted on Tuesday, May 16, 2006 @ 17:43:51 GMT by vlad
|
|
Anonymous writes: From KeelyNet news; 05/16/06 - Claims of Free Energy deal
(Courtesy
Dan York...this one reeks to high heaven of a Dennis Lee type
membership with promises setup...CAVEAT EMPTOR and a huge block of
salt. - JWD) Revolutionarily new and dynamic ENERGY - FUEL - A New
Science Technology for ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION and ELECTRIC AUTO
ENGINES.
Inventor Donatelli's description of his invention
The
GIFT and every Power Plant Dante owns, the other nine, uses an
“ELECTROMECHANICAL” systems of operations. No one in the history of
science and the world has ever used this combination of energies
before. Electrical energy – converted to mechanical energy – then used
to develop free mechanical energy – then both added up, the converted
mechanical energy and the developed free mechanical energies - and this
total transmitted and converted to more electrical than is being used
when system is operating.
The 2080 MW "DYNALEVER" Power Plant is 885
feet long & 285 feet wide, and in comparison, sits on acreage only
1/800th as large as large as that the Hoover Dam/Lake Mead Power Plant
uses, and although it generates over 3000 MW of electricity, 1000 MW
being used for the Power Plants operation, delivers the same 2080
million watts electricity per second as the Hoover Dam. The Power Plant
uses over 32 million pounds of solid matter in motion, by way of 16
pods, with 8 - 1/2 cylinders in each pod, using 500,000 pounds of solid
matter each, and with 16 massive, 60 foot, 100 ton flywheels, cranking
out over 3 million horsepower operating 32 specially constructed
Electrical Generators, as 1 million HP is used to generate electricity
for the operations of the entire Power Plant, 2 million to generate
electricity for sale.
THE REMARKABLE THING THAT SCIENCE MISSED, ONCE THE “FUEL” IS
PLACED IN MOTION, IT TAKES VERY LITTLE TO KEEP IN MOTION, BY WAY OF
ENERGY, AND THIS IS A PHENOMENON OF NATURE...still no details but
sounds like Bessler or some kind of swinging pendulum/seesaw with
rotary flywheels effect. Why do these types always make OUTRAGEOUS
POWER CLAIMS but no one can do Hal Puthoffs' 1 WATT Challenge on a
small scale? No, it has to be millions of dollars and massive
equipment/investment as their proofs? And nothing for the
contributors...
Inventor claimed name Dante A. Donatelli Jr. - claimed he had discovered the Third Use of the Bernoulli’s Principle - Contributions to this CHARITY
that gives you 'Name Immortality'...big whoopee! - Phase One, 3.8
million dollar FUND-DRIVE - no proof, no details, nothing for the
investor - “CEDCO”, short for the “Clean ‘Enerpower’ Development
Corporation”, the Marketing for-profit corporation to be formed and
owned exclusively by onegift4power...Company contact - R. Hutchins, 215
Pebblebrook St., Arlington, TX 76014-1032, telephone: 877-829-5500
(US/Canada Tollfree number) AND Superpages shows Donatelli, Nancy
(related to inventor Dante with same address), 215 Pebblebrook St,
Arlington, TX 76014-1032, (817) 461-5560
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by malc on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 @ 03:35:38 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley | Why do these types always make OUTRAGEOUS POWER CLAIMS but no one can do Hal Puthoffs' 1 WATT Challenge on a small scale? No, it has to be millions of dollars and massive equipment/investment as their proofs? And nothing for the contributors...
Quite! This has always puzzled me as well. In fact if we are ever to have a usable device it would have to be portable and small (in a car). Since a car requires about 10 times more peak power than a house then a domestic unit will be even smaller than a car unit. In addition it would have to be cost effective i.e. a car unit < £1000 and therefore a house unit at least < £500. Such a device, if possible, will not cost millions to produce a demo unit.
Any true demonstrable device has to be within the budget of a home inventor. The "millions" comes in when tooling up for mass production.
I'll say this again. Forget patents. Publish the device on the web with your name all over it and you will be rich from the publicity even if mega corp inc mass produces it without your involvement. Also remember this if the artic tundra melts (and its softening now!) we can all kiss our asses goodbye so money and patents means nothing. |
|
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by OneGift4PowerWebmaster on Thursday, June 01, 2006 @ 17:20:46 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.OneGift4Power.org | Hello All, This is the Webmaster for www.OneGift4Power.org I wanted to post to correct an inaccuracy in the original post by VLAD. The contact information on the original post is absolutely INCORRECT - As R. Hutchins is NOT the company contact - But rather, the IRS lady who is listed on our charitable IRS documentation. And, the 877-829-5500 number is also for the IRS. OUR correct contact information is listed on our website at www.OneGift4Power.org - However, we will list it here for your convienience: OneGift4Power 215 Pebblebrook St. Arlington, TX. 76014 (817) 461-5560 Phone (817) 274-4979 Fax Join@OneGift4Power.org (email) Thank you for allowing us to clarify the incorrect contact information from the original post - We hope you have a great day. Marc
|
|
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by gn0stik on Thursday, September 14, 2006 @ 08:50:01 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) | So they say they use 1 Million horse power to generate electricity for the power of the plant, which is powered by what? The HP is torque*rpm/(some magical number which I forget at this moment). How much is being used to power the motors that turn the flywheel? That must be the 1GW, they talked about. (BTW 3GW - 1GW does not equal 2080)
Ok so let's look at the math, however flawed it may be, from the article.
We've got 16 flywheels turned by motors powered at 1GW (big motors) cranking out 3 M Horsepower. 1 HP = 746 Watts or there abouts. So a Million HP would be 746M Watts. These flywheels are powered by the 1GW so we've got a net loss of 254M watts for every GWatt used to turn the flywheels on the mechanical side.
This 746M Watts then in turn cranks 32 specially contructed electrical generators that pump out a total of 3GW feeding 1 back to the loop, and and sending 2 out to the grid? ground? what? This is where the magic happens apparently. IN THE GENERATORS... It has nothing to do with the mechanical side of it, there are NET LOSSES on the mechanical side.
In short, they guy's a huckster. He can't even feed us evidence that matches with this story.
|
|
|
Re: Claims of Electromechanical Free Energy Invention (Score: 1)
by SOLIDDAD on Thursday, May 28, 2009 @ 13:04:53 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) | To continue answering the comments above:
My name is Dante A. Donatelli Jr., nickname SOLIDDAD
I AM President of ONEGIFT4POWER, and own nine Power Plants, as I gave the charity one, so as they can propagate it. The charity is in the Fund-Raising phase of operations. I am their spokesperson, so I have to explain what I can.
I have answered a few comments, but now, because I got an email asking why I didn’t address all of them, here goes. Sorry I use so many words, but there are hundreds of thousands of words to completely explain. I use just a few!
A very stupid webworm by the name of JAKE, said he’s been watching the likes of Newman, Lee, and the sorts for over 25 years. All show and no go, he states.. “Give me the money and I’ll promise you the moon”, he also states, in quotes as if these inventors were saying it. Then, he has to add, (you stupid investors.)
Are investors stupid? According to this idiots miniature mind, but quite a few thousand have gotten rich, investing in “nuts”.
Evidently JAKE is a weird, tired, sick and jealous person. So what, all show and no go. There are many things that can hold up great inventions. One, of course is money. Another, which few realize, is pressure form Power brokers, Governments etc. Remember, IF one, like we can, perform like claims, THE TECHNOLOGY IS WORTH HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS, but if one, LIKE WE ARE, has a totally NEW SCIENCE, ERGO, A TOTALLY NEW TECHNOLOGY, which the world believes is impossible, ITS WORTH TRILLIONS. Then there is timing. Is the World ready for the product. Then, as in most cases, sorry to say, the invention isn’t powerful enough to be built any larger than a model.
I personally went to Boulder Colorado in 1996, to the Tesla Convention. I saw many beautiful models, that didn’t work. One even had a special showing, which most all attendees to the conference attended. He had nothing.
The point is, yes, there have been many busts, but I am in no position to judge them as JAKE did.
The fact is, JAKE is jealous. Jealous because he doesn’t have a “flop” or a “successful” machine. These worms always have something negative to say because they have limited brainpower, and as I stated in my last comment, couldn’t even invent a left handed tooth brush, so they sit in judgment of those who can.
I, on the other hand, HAVE SHOWN, not to the likes of him, as he isn’t anyone who has anything of value to offer, just a big blow hole, and these abound, but, I have shown some of my technology, yes, a New Science Technology and not just one device with one claim, to two of the WORLDS BEST EXPERTS, one a PhD of ME, PE, and the other a Doctor of physics, a teacher, one who teaches others to teach, (CHAIR of the physics department at the University of Dallas,) author, T. V. producer of physics shows, nationally acclaimed and given 2 million, only he, to do work for the NSF, etc.
THESE HAD WHAT I NEEDED AT THE TIME I NEEDED IT, CREDIBILITY!
THEN, AFTER I SHOWED THEM, VALIDITY!
Yes, I am heads and shoulders above all the rest, SIMPLY BECAUSE I DON’T HAVE 1000 common PHYSICS, ETC, EXPERTS, I only have TWO OF THE WORLDS BEST.
Two is plenty, when one like I claims he has “Power Plants that run themselves, ELECTRICALLY, and use no added fuel once designed and started up,” simply because the entire world, even webworms and web-maggots know this is impossible, so if two of the best state it it’s not only possible, it’s a fact, and Dante did what he claims, and he has been validated, JAKE and his friends can suck an egg.
NOW, about the money thing! I explained that in my first comment.
Now to address a certain goOstik. This person is hung up on my DYNALEVER math. I will be the first to admit, it may be confusing or even wrong.
That said, however, my DYNALEVER isn’t wrong. It is what I claim. It has been called “amazing” by the ME. Its been stated as “performs like nothing before”, by the Doctor of Physics.
WHY?
Why would two world class experts even bother making remarks. Why would either make remarks like they did. MAYBE, just maybe, it is what I claim.
But, that said, lets address the math, horsepower, watts, flywheels, motors, etc., he refers to.
FIRST, I never stated any motor was running any flywheel in the DYNALEVER Power Plants. He assumed this or dreamt it up, or assumed that because all others do it, I must as well. HE IS STUPIDLY WRONG!
My motors, which are not gigantic, they are in the range of 1,000 HP. ( even if we used larger sizes, they only draw, after power plant, DYNALEVER, ½ cylinder is started, much, much less wattage, because of the phenomena of electric motors and the fact, speed requires less that start-up, as your auto proves.) They are attached and run my mechanics, ( keeping the solid matter fuel in motion, at the desired speed,) NOT THE FLYWHEEL. The mechanics, solid matter fuel attached, runs the flywheel.
But, what I didn’t say in my description, is that we use very, very small electric motors, compared to what runs the mechanics, FIRST raising the 500,000 pounds, very, very, very slowly, THEN, the first drop starts the entire cell, as all four DYNALEVERS, are lifted at the same time.
There are 16 cells, each with its own very heavy flywheel, each with one or maybe two, (I am no expert in electrical generators,) electrical generators. There are 4 -1/2 cylinders, each ½ cylinder uses 500,000# of fuel, 2 cylinders in each cell, 2 million pounds of fuel, raising in 2.2 seconds, and dropping each 2.2 seconds, or taking 8.8 seconds for one rotation of the flywheel, (four quarters at 2.2 seconds, as all four DYNALEVERS work at the same time, two dropping while two are lifting,) and each flywheel is in the neighborhood of 100 tons, 60 foot diameter.
POINT IS: the motor we use AFTER the first drops, (four in total) in each cell, we only need another, say 1,000 HP electric motor, OR LESS, in each ½ cylinder, to keep all in motion. Remember, ONCE AGAIN, as this means everything in my innovative arrangement of mechanics, we use ALL THREE MECHANICAL ADVANTAGES of the lever, the inclined plane and the wheel and axel to lift and maintain the 500,000 pound masses of fuel, in each ½ cylinder, and EVERYONE knows that a very small amount of force can lift by the lever, or be pushed up a plane, by the inclined plane, and/or attached to the outer rim of a wheel, and THAT’S ALL THE FORCE NEEDED TO LIFT OUR MASS, FORTY FEET! We lift it very innovatively, as how else could we achieve what we do!
Remember, one of my claims is that I can .lift 1000# with only 100# of force (same ration for any amount of mass.) Not in all, as they all vary, some need 200# or 300# of force to raise each 1000#, BUT, ITS MUCH LESS, (some need much less, as they use different Basic Laws of nature and mechanical advantage, etc.,)
And, distance traveled means nothing in our Power Plants, ratio of mechanical advantage DOES, as for example, a 10 foot bar, with a fulcrum attached at the 1 foot mark, will lift 1000# with only 100#’s of force, if applied at the long or effort part of the 10 foot lever. BUT, it has to move 10 feet, for this to be applied. AND, the 1000# is only lifted 1 foot.
GREAT, we use all this Old Science physics NEGATIVES, as stated, TO OUR ADVANTAGE.
How else could my mechanics be so different, IF I DON’T APPLY FORCE DIFFERENTLY?
NOW, using only 1000 HP electric motors, or less, AFTER POWER PLANT IS STARTED UP, and multiplying these by 745 watts each requires, one gets some 745,000 watts needed, and because there are some 64, a total of 47, 680, 000 watts are needed, IF MOTORS ARE RUNNING AT FULL POWER, BUT OURS DO NOT.
Remember, someplace in my text, on the web, I state the following facts:
An electric motor needs two things to operate. Current Volume and Current Strength. VOLTS are Current Volume and AMPS are Current Strength, so
A watt is amps times volts, BUT THERE ARE TWO PHENOMENA IN EACH ELECTRIC MOTOR, concerning these volts and amps, speed and power:
ONE, when one lowers the voltage, as has been performed for decades, one gets a Variable Speed Motor, but the same Current Strength.
SECOND, when one lowers the AMPS, and keeps the VOLTS THE SAME, the electric motor looses STRENGTH, less foot-pounds developed, BUT, MAINTAINS SPEED!
NO ONE IN THE WORLD HAS EVER ACCOMPLISHED THIS, BUT I HAVE!
This simply means, once our DYNALEVER and/or any other of our Power Plants are STARTED, and OPERATING, AND DEVELOPING FOOT-POUNDS OF HORSEPOWER AND MECHANICAL ENERGY, (both energy and power have the exact same unit of measure, being the foot-pound,) BY WAY OF THE “FUEL” BEING IN MOTION, WHICH IS A FACT, AS THE MOTION IS STEADY BY A STEADY SPEED OF ANY ELECTRIC MOTOR, the electric motor, NEEDS MUCH LESS WATTAGE TO OPERATE, as per the phenomena spoken of!
I realize it is a little confusing, because I have no diagrams I want to show. If I did, it would be so clear, you would fall off your chairs. It also is so simple, as well!
This simply means, that if, as I do in the DYNALEVER, which I will explain next, DEVELOP MORE WATTAGE than I need, AFTER START UP, the entire Power Plant can run itself, ELECTRICALLY, as an electric motor CARES NOT WHERE ITS WATTS ARE COMING FROM, and an electrical generator, CARES NOT WHAT USES THE WATTS THEY DEVELOP AND DELIVER! Period! And, the lotor doesn’t run the generator directly, realizing all the back and forth pressures, as an auto, for example does. With the mechanics in the middle, all the motor has to do is run at a given speed, with less strength, and never is concerned with the mechanics running the electric generator. INNOVATIVE MECHANICS, remember! Mechanics that “have never performed like anything before”, a stated by Dr. Richard Olenick, and ‘AMAZING”, according to Ted Carnes, PhD., ME., PE.!
NOW,…. WHAT DO I DEVELOP????
Simply, as I do not want to confuse anyone, as I have been confused, as I will explain next, 500,000 pounds, falling 40 feet, in 2.2 seconds, develops some 16,500 HP, per ½ cylinder. Period!
I didn’t invent this, there is a simple Horsepower formula, which is FORCE (mass in pounds,) x DISTANCE (in feet) = foot-pounds. Divided by TIME, ( in seconds, as 550, a constant, is multiplied by the actual time, in this case 2.2 seconds,) and there it is, HORSEPOWER developed when mass falls.
NOW, COMES THE GOOD PART. Each 16,500 HP is multiplied by 10, ( or we can use 5, or 15, or 20, as the options are available, we choose 10 because of area,) as we use the mechanical advantage of all three of the simple machines, as stated, SO, 165,000 hp IS TRANSMITTED INTO ¼ th OF THE FLYWHEEL, AND THIS IS MULTIPLIED BY TWO, AS TWO MASSES ARE DROPPING WHILE TWO MASSES ARE RISING IN EACH CELL, ( A ½ CYLINDER TIMES TWO, ONE FALLING ONE RISING, SO, IN ONE QUARTER, 330,000 hp IS BEING DELIVERED, PER QUARTER.
And, when all four quarters of the flywheel have turned, accepting 330,000 HP per quarter, one has, for each cell, per each flywheel, per 4 DYNALEVERS in operation, 1,320,000 HP per ONE REVOLUTION of the VERY, VERY HEAVY FLYWHEEL, BUT, WE ALSO DELIVER HP, ON THE UP MOTION, AS WELL, but this is added, and we will not explain herein. It is to technical.
This simply means we have the capacity to apply 1,056,000 HP, when one full rotation of the flywheel is made.
Relate this to an auto engine and flywheel. Say an 8 cylinder engine, that’s rated at 320 Horsepower.
EACH CYLINDER PUTS ONLY 40 HP INTO THE SYSTEM, AT INTERVALS OF 1/8 OF THE FLYWHEELS TRAVEL.
In other words, each cylinder doesn’t apply 320 HP, but 8 times 40 applies 320 HP, PER REVOLUTION OF THE FLYWHEEL.
The same happens to our Power Plants. THAT’S WHY LITTLE BURSTS OF PUSHING or PULLING OF OUR TRANSMISSION RODS, AS IN THE LEVER EXAMPLE, ONLY MOVING A SHORT DISTANCE, DOESN’T BOTHER US, AS WE USE IT TO OUR ADVANTAGE.
Now, because our flywheel is moving slow, storing this 1 million plus HP, we have to increase the speed A LITTLE TO RUN OUR GENERATORS. For every time we double, we have to reduce the HP by 2.
So, after we reach OUR R.P.M., (REDUCED THREE TIMES,) we have approximately some 264,000 HP being applied to our specially constructed electrical generators, (AS OURS WILL BE OPERATING, DEVELOPING THE EXACT SAME WATTAGE, as others traveling at higher speeds, but ours, will have to travel slower, to develop the same wattage, or what we need, WITH A LONGER, BIGGER GENERATOR CONSTRUCTION. Generators, as I understand it, contain copper wire and magnets, and the more one uses, the slower one can run the generator, and the maximum wattage can be attained. It’s a matter of material!
Yes, expensive, BUT REMEMBER, OUR POWER PLANTS USE NO FUEL. Capital cost, although lower than coal and nuclear, on the same cost plane as natural gas, MEAN NOTHING. The yearly costs, plus the yearly actual depreciation of parts, plus maintenance of the others, costs 95% of the electric costs to the public. The DYNALEVER is projected to cost ONLY, ½ CENT PER KWH, BECAUSE OF THIS 95% LESS NEEDS, and because we generate no heat and/or consume no duel, our power plants will last for a hundred years, or so!
Fuel is the most expensive thing in any Power Plant, and heat related maintenance is second, ergo, electric prices to the consumer are high, because fuel, and maintenance costs, (including the E. P. A. rules and regulations being applied TO DOUBLE THE CAPITAL COSTS OF THOSE MENTIONED, BUT NOT TO OURS)!, all add costs that we do not have to bear!
POINT IS, whether my numbers add up or not, (as there are a few quirks in the watts, horsepower, and vice versa functions,) we use less wattage, smaller motors, simply because we use three mechanical advantages, plus the phenomena found in electric motors, both, DECREASES OUR NEEDS FOR WATTAGE TO OPERATE THE POWER PLANTS.
And, as far as we are concerned, developing over 4.2 MILLION HORSEPOWER, to operate electrical generators, can develop some 4,160 MW of electricity, COMPARING TO WHAT THE HOOVER DAM ADVERTISES! It states it develops some 2.2 Million HP, developing some 2080 MW of electricity, AS POSTED AND ADVERTISED FACT.
Calculate it anyway you want, because there are so many variables, if one wants to confuse the issue, he or she can mix up the variables, AND MAKE ME LOOK STUPID.
I AM STUPID ABOUT ELECTRICITY.
HOWEVER, I AM A GENIUS ABOUT MECHANICS!
MY CLAIM TO FAME IS THE FACT THAT I DELIVER HORSEPOWER.
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS WILL DESIGN AND DEVELOP THE ELECTRICAL END, NOT ME! I only know the facts I read in books.
ALL I KNOW, IS I DEVELOP MUCH MORE HORSEPOWER, THAN IS NEEDED BY THE POWER PLANT TO OPERATE, ERGO, MORE HORSEPOWER DEVELOPED, LESS USED, MEANS THE POWER PLANTS WILL INDEED, RUN THEMSELVES, ELECTRICALLY, OR HORSEPOWERERLLY, IF THERE IS SUCH A WORD, WHICH I DON’T THINK THERE IS.
YOU FIGURE IT OUT! I HAVE BEEN VALIDATED! I DON’T HAVE TO FIGURE IT OUT!
ALSO, I DO NOT NEED TO PRESENT EVIDENCE TO MATCH MY STORY!
If you or any other entity doesn’t believe it, so be it. ALL I HAVE TO DO IS CONVINCE MY CONTRIBUTORS, PERIOD!
TWO WORLD CLASS EXPERTS, DO BELIEVE IT. EACH MAKES ASTOUNDING STATEMENTS, COMPARED TO THE FACT, ITS SUPPOSEDLY IMPOSSIBLE TO ACHIEVE. BUT, THAT SAID, WASN’T EVERY GREAT DISCOVERY TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE BEFORE IT WAS DISCOVERED?
Take Portland cement, for instance. A nut, with no friends, because he would always ask them for a dime or two, by the name of Portland, stated” I can take rock, crush it, dry it out, then, when I want to, add water, and make rock again! THAT WAS THE CRAZIEST, MOST IMPOSSIBLE THING OF HIS DAY, but the fact remains, the day he died, ROCK was found in his washbasin, The problem he had for years, because he couldn’t put up, as most want, was finding the proper rock. TODAY, CONCRETE IS AS COMMON AS DIRT! Or, take the computer, for instance. Man talking to a machine, and the machine answering him back!!! CRAZY! NUTS! IMPOSSIBLE! The day before the computer was invented. SO, I RUN IN GOOD COMPANY! The “NUTS” of the world!
Web-worm, or maggots, even an engineer, sitting behind his computer, hunched down so nobody can see him, and punching out negative words, ABOUT SOMETHING HE NEVER WITNESSED, BUT READ A FEW WORDS I WROTE. MEANS NOTHING. PERIOD!
It may to his fellow web worms, BUT, NOT TO THE INTELLIGENT OF THE WORLD!.
AND, HAS ANYONE EVER THOUGHT THAT MAYBE. JUST MAYBE, I WROTE CONFUSING WORDS, just to screw with these idiots heads.
But, with MY CREDIBILITY, and VALIDATION, who needs to say anything!
Now, just to explain to those who still think he is right.
I present the following, very confusing facts!
One horsepower needs 745 watts to operate.
Two horsepower is needed to develop 1000 watts in a common electric generator.
The Hoover Dam Power Plant,. Started out in 1936, delivering some 35% less electricity, ( about 1352 MW,), but they increased the efficiency of their generators a few years ago, and today, they do not get what they started with, with common dynamos’, they get 35% more, or so, because they increased the efficiency, Not the horsepower. This cannot be increased in the Hoover Dam system, as the water depth of the Lake Mead determines this, but in our DYNALEVER Power Plant design, OURS CAN, and AS MUCH HORSEPOWER AS ONE WANTS, OR NEEDS, CAN BE DEVELOPED!.
We will start out with the most efficient electrical generators, because they will be specially built, some 32 of them, and, even though the cost of each will be, say 100% , 200% or more, more than a common one, THEY WILL DELIVER MORE ELECTRICITY, AT SLOWER SPEEDS!
Other facts:
An electric motor produces some 55 foot-pounds, or maybe 3 foot-pounds per horsepower, depending on what book one reads. This is very confusing to a person like myself, but its true. I read in a college textbook, that
1 hp = 550 ftlb/s = 745.7 watts.
1 Watt = 1.341 x 10 -3 hp.
The I found a conversion table that stated:
1J + 10/7 erg + .0738 ftlb. Multiplying 745, as one watt equals I joule, (figure this crazy physics out), equals some 549.81 foot-pounds!
Then an engineer corrected me when I used 550 ftlbs, and said its only 3 foot –pounds.
WHAT IS THE TRUTH! All I know, that whatever it is, we develop more than the electric motors uses, thus the wattage, because we ONLY need speed, will operate with much fewer watts, after start-up!
Your auto uses MAXIMUM WATTAGE, amperage, times 12 volts, WHEN STARTING, but once started, the wattage needed, is near nothing, just for a spark or two!
POINT IS: I have stated “physics is rift with errors”
The most intelligent person in the world, stated it first.
All I know, if one can take my figures and screw them up, as assumption can top anything, and erroneous physics helps these poor souls, then, call me a huckster, so be it.
I HAVE BEEN VALIDATED BY TWO WORLD CALLS EXPERTS, WHO HAVE, YES, WHO HAVE, YES I MEAN THEY HAVE, WITNESSED all I showed them.
EVERYONE ELSE, including web-worms and web-maggots can only assume, and they only can assume with FALSE PHYSICS, as I will never show them anything! PERIOD!
Now, as far as me being a HUCKSTER, I confess: YES I AM!
I am President of a charity, My job NOW is to raise funds. I am doing that. In order for me to accomplish this, I HAVE TO SELL WHAT WE OWN, WHO WE ARE, ETC., ETC., and by this definition: “one who works selling something for a client”, I AM A HUCKSTER. PERIOD!
Oh, and by the way, wonder what the web-worms and maggots would say if I explained how my DYNAPLANE or DYNAWHEEL Power Plants operate.
It would blow their small minds!
|
|
|
|
|
