Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 123 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		U.S. SCIENCE POLICY: Legislator Wants NSF to Offer $1 Billion Energy Prize Posted on Sunday, May 28, 2006 @ 18:40:08 UTC by vlad By Jeffrey Mervis / Science, March 10, 2006 "Could a $1 billion prize help end the U.S. addiction to foreign oil? Representative Frank Wolf (R-VA) thinks it might. Last week, he urged the National Science Foundation (NSF) to raise such a prodigious amount from private sources and then give it to scientists offering ideas on how to make the United States energy independent." More at: http://www.sciencemag.org/ (needs subscription)   Login Nickname Password Security Code: Type Security Code Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. Related Links · More about Legal · News by vlad Most read story about Legal: Formation of Archer Energy Systems, Inc. Article Rating Average Score: 1 Votes: 1 Please take a second and vote for this article: Options   Printer Friendly "U.S. SCIENCE POLICY: Legislator Wants NSF to Offer $1 Billion Energy Prize" | Login/Create an Account | 5 comments | Search Discussion The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register House votes for oil drilling in Alaska refuge (Score: 1) by vlad on Sunday, May 28, 2006 @ 18:57:58 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com By Chris Baltimore /Reuters /Thursday, May 25, 2006; 9:51 PM WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday approved a plan to allow oil drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The House voted 225-201 to approve a plan sponsored by California Republican Richard Pombo that would allow drilling on 2,000 acres of ANWR out of the refuge's total 19 million acres. Full story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Re: U.S. SCIENCE POLICY: Legislator Wants NSF to Offer $1 Billion Energy Prize (Score: 1) by ElectroDynaCat on Monday, May 29, 2006 @ 07:11:33 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Somehow, I don't think that money was ever the problem, 1 billion dollars is a pittance compared to the 20 billion Americans spend on pizza every year. If  money alone could have solved the problem, it would have been fixed a long time ago. The problem is not energy or money, the problem is our denial, the first step any addict must take is to admit his addiction and understand that they alone cannot solve it. We are in denial, we are just an addict that happens to be in the phase of addiction where the drug supply is cut off, and the dealer is hoarding whatever is left and raising the price. The price was money at one time, now the dealer wants us to prostitute ourselves. We are willing to do that, spill our blood in defending those that hate us. When the crisis is over,temporarily, we will continue in our addiction until the next time. Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose The more it changes, the more its the same. Re: U.S. SCIENCE POLICY: Legislator Wants NSF to Offer $1 Billion Energy Prize (Score: 1) by kurt9 on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 @ 16:33:33 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.metatechnica.com X-prizes for the development of fusion or ZPE (if its real) strikes me as the most sensible approach to dealing with foreign oil dependency and global warming. The X-prize system is being used to further space development and anti-aging therapies. There is no reason why it should not work here as well. The regulatory approach to dealing with these issues is a dead horse. Get over it and move on. Re: U.S. SCIENCE POLICY: Legislator Wants NSF to Offer $1 Billion Energy Prize (Score: 1) by VULTURES on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 @ 01:34:45 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) YES WE AT VULTURES INC ARE LOOKING FOR FUNDING TO BUILD COLD FUSION NEXT YEAR' AND YES WE WILL LIKE TO HAVE SOME OF THAT FUNDING BUT ONE BILLION DOLLAR IS TO MUCH FUNDING  TO BE REAL ' FOR WHAT ' REAL RESEACH DONT TAKE THAT KIND OF FUNDING TO EVEN BUILD COLD FUSION WILL NOT TAKE ONE BILLION DOLLAR ? THAT HOW FUNDING COME UP MISSING EACH TIME    SO N-S-F TELL VULTURES INC  HOW DO WE GET SOME THAT OVER LOAD BUGET  AND TAKE MY ONE YEAR OPRATION TO BUILD COLD FUSION? ALL WE NEEDY IS JUST $15 MILLION DOLLAR TO BEING COLD FUSION TO WORLD TAKE WHAT WE DONT USE AND PAY USA PEOPLE  POWER COST FOR THIIS YEAR AND COLD FUSION WILL TAKE OVER THAT NEXT YEAR THE YEAR OF FUSION 2007 FREE MAN FROM POWER COST.             VULTURES INC Re: U.S. SCIENCE POLICY: Legislator Wants NSF to Offer $1 Billion Energy Prize (Score: 1) by bender772 on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 @ 04:58:29 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.suppressedscience.net This is never going to work, for the same reason that government-funded "big science" hasn't already come up with a working free energy system (and still by and large denies the very possibility). If $1 billion became available and the NSF had to decide who to give it to, it would use the same, fundamentally flawed process that is already screwing up mainstream science: peer review. Read Thomas Gold's article "The Inertia of Scientific Thought" for details on just how badly peer review is broken. The end result would be that the money would go to people with ideas for incremental improvements of existing technologies, while people who work on cold fusion, ZPE/ether energy devices, macroscopic Maxwell demons, anti-gravity, etc would be turned away without review on a-priori ground of lacking any and all scientific credibility.

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.