Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 282 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science


    ECW E-Cat World


    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times



    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Tesla's Aether was a Sea of Whirlpools
    Posted on Thursday, March 29, 2007 @ 07:55:26 GMT by vlad

    Science FDT writes:
    In the 1937 Encyclopaedia Britannica it mentions in the 'Ether' section that there is a theory of light, as yet incomplete, in which light consists of an aethereal substance being swung diagonally from vortex to vortex, and that the circumferential velocity of these vortices is of the order of the speed of light. It doesn't say who was working on this theory.

    Regarding Tesla's aether, John J O'Neill stated,
    "Long ago he recognized that all perceptible matter comes from a primary substance, or tenuity beyond conception, filling all space, the Akasha or luminiferous ether, acted upon by the life giving Prana or creative force, calling into existence, in never ending cycles all things and phenomena. The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance." (Grotz, 1997)

    The important thing to note about Tesla's aether is the fact that it is filled with vortices. Bernoulli and Maxwell both worked with a sea of tiny aethereal vortices, and Maxwell used Bernoullian hydrodynamics to successfully calculate the forces of electromagnetism.

    These facts are often overlooked by supporters of the aether who attempt to explain electromagnetism with the aether alone and neglect to consider that the aether needs to be filled with whirlpools. See 'The Aether and the Electric Sea' at,

    and 'The Link between Electric Current and Magnetic Field' at,

    Yours sincerely, David Tombe



    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad

    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 1

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Very Good


     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

    "Tesla's Aether was a Sea of Whirlpools" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Do Magnetic Field Lines Physically Circulate? (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Sunday, April 01, 2007 @ 11:43:18 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Dear Dr. Newman,

    I have been reading your gyroscopic theory of magnetic field lines and I find it extremely interesting.

    I notice that, just as in my own theory, you envisage that magnetic lines of force are traced out by the axes of the fundamental gyroscopic particles of nature.

    But I notice that you also envisage that these fundamental gyroscopic particles will be moving translationally along the magnetic field lines.

    In my article 'The Coriolis Force in Maxwell's Equations' I equate the Coriolis force with the gyroscopic component of the Lorentz force and I see it as being crucial in determining the arrangement of the fundamental particles of the luminiferous medium. In section VIII entitled 'Inflow and Outflow Theory', I discuss the issue of whether or not the fundamental particles would circulate in and out of a bar magnet along the magnetic lines of force. See,


    However, I came to the conclusion that they don't, and that any spiraling effects in the double helix arrangement of the magnetic field lines are only illusory.

    I came to this conclusion based on simple classical reasoning. I considered that if magnetic field lines are caused by the translational motion of electrons in a wire, then there would be no rational dynamical reason as to why they would cause the surrounding electron-positron dipoles (gyroscopes) to circulate around the wire perpendicularly to the motion of the electric current.

    Furthermore, I reasoned that all aspects of electromagnetism could be accounted for on the basis of non-circulating magnetic field lines since vorticity is clearly the key quantity.

    Recently in my paper number 7, I proposed a new theory of electric current to gear in with magnetic lines of force. On reflection, I can see how it is possible that electric current might be a screw motion of gyroscopes (orbiting Cooper Pairs). If the actual electric current itself screws its way along the wire in complex epicycles, then this might perhaps cause magnetic field lines to circulate. We cannot underestimate what the Coriolis force might do in such a complex scenario.

    It all comes down to getting a more focused picture of what exactly electric current is.

    You have now got me thinking again.

    There might be circulatory motion of the magnetic field lines because I have also recently realized that the solution to the multi body problem involving the four forces (1) Inverse Square Law (2) Centrifugal Force (3) Coriolis Force, and (4) Angular Force, is non-analytical.

    As such it is impossible to state for certain how the fundamental particles will move relative to each other. The Lorentz force is the joker in the pack. It is mathematically equivalent to Kepler's law of areal velocity and it conveniently disappears for planetary orbital theory. But it must be present for electron positron interactions at microscopic level and as such the gyroscopic component could have circulatory effects that we can't easily guess qualitatively.

    I can qualitatively see how the centrifugal force will cause the pressure and the magnetic repulsion, and how the Coriolis force will cause the gyroscopic alignment into the solenoidal double helix arrangement. I can see how the Coulomb tension will cause the magnetic attraction, and how the angular force will cause EM induction and EM radiation.

    But I can't say for certain whether or not the fundamental gyroscopic units will move translationally along the magnetic field lines.

    Have you got any comments to make that might be persuasive one way or the other?

    I notice that you say that you got Evan Soule to help you illustrate your model. I would like to see the double helix model simulated with modern computer graphics.

    I look forward to hearing from you.

    Yours sincerely David Tombe

    Joseph Newman web Link,
    http://www.josephnewman.com/Secret_of_Photo_51.html [www.josephnewman.com]

    The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Thursday, March 29, 2007 @ 07:57:30 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Sepp Hasslberger Update: The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field

    We are all familiar with the fascinating swirling motion of water as it pours out of a sink. The scientific name for this phenomenon is vorticity and such a whirlpool is known as a vortex. In the 17th century, Descartes proposed that the Planets move around the Sun because they are swept around by whirlpools of a subtle matter filling all space. The double helix nebula - Image credit: M. Morris, UCLA via Space.com Descartes' theory however disagreed with Newton's law of gravity. If Descartes' theory were correct the theory of conservation of energy would break down and we would have extra tangential forces involved in planetary orbital theory that would have the same mathematical form as the forces involved...

    http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/03/the_double_helix_theory_of_the.html [blog.hasslberger.com]


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.