Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 127 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		New Model of the Universe Posted on Friday, September 21, 2007 @ 22:32:51 UTC by vlad (OT but very interesting and well done videos). Neal Adams Science Project - Please Show this Videos to Your Geology or Physics Teacher/Professor For Comment The case against pangea First… it’s important to understand that this is the most profound disagreement in all of science in a century and a half… and, even so, it is the tip of the iceberg, the ramifications of this disagreement will change everything we know in science, top to bottom. New Model Basics - Open Letter to Science, Neal's Earth Project Made Easy Articles: New York Times Article Supports Neal's Theory Neal Adams Science Project Site: http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html   Login Nickname Password Security Code: Type Security Code Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. Related Links · More about Science · News by vlad Most read story about Science: 100 miles on 4 ounces of water? Article Rating Average Score: 5 Votes: 3 Please take a second and vote for this article: Options   Printer Friendly "New Model of the Universe" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments | Search Discussion The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: New Model of the Universe (Score: 1) by Zanstel on Monday, September 24, 2007 @ 06:25:34 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) It is a interesant idea. But, if is correct, the planets could "grow" from differents perspectives. For example, the mass could be in grow, adding misterious new matter to the core. But it could be possible that the relative size of the lighter and heavier materials had changed in time. As the planets normally has heavier material in the core, if the lighters elements go smaller, the effects would be similar. Or if havier elements grows, the same. The autor uses the complementary argument about dinosaurs. Although is a different argument, and this could be wrong and the tectonic part could be right, if we accept, could be explained with this. The atoms are growing and getting heavier. The lighter elements too, but less, and because has a little differences, stars has not significat changes, and we has not detected this effects at too much larger distances (where we can see past events in space). But the effects in planets will be more observable, as the cores will have more dense elements. But because the elements expands too, the radius would be grown too, and the total gravity will grow less than from a only "grow" hypotesis. The combinations are big. Re: New Model of the Universe (Score: 1) by fullofnrg on Saturday, September 22, 2007 @ 20:46:02 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) O.K. sooo Maybe I didn't read it as close as I should have but what exactly does it mean? So the earth grew. What made it grow? Why is this a huge issue? Can't change whatever happened. To me it looks like all of a sudden there was a lot more water on the earth than there was before it grew but where did the water come from? Does it mean my real estate value is going to go up or go down? Will I, or my ancestors be taxed more for having more land? Should I buy a bigger lawn mower and more grass seed? Should I think about an addition on my house? Hmmm The possibilities are endless. I'm not a geologist although I know what a sex stone is (it's a freakin sic. rock). Guess I don't get it...   Re: New Model of the Universe by malc on Monday, September 24, 2007 @ 02:50:20 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.