ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 166 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Is General Theory of Relativity really "general"?
Posted on Monday, September 24, 2007 @ 20:17:53 UTC by vlad

Science Anonymous writes: We know that by calling the General Theory of Relativity, Einstein thought that his latter theory somehow encompassed the previous Special Theory of Relativity and the theory of gravitation. But is it really so?

Based on the very Special Theory of Relativity and the curvature tensor and matter tensor, together with a thought experiment, we can show that both special theory of relativity and general theory of relativity have an intrinsic contradiction among themselves. And the theories of relativity are to be explored further to tackle this contradiction. In other words, the theories of relativity are not “always right” such as the mass media often praises, when the scientists find any new data confirming the theories.

Now let’s make it clearer.

The equation of General Theory of Relativity is as follows:


R(i,k) = k T(i,k) (1)

k is Einstein’s gravitational constant

R(i,k) is Riemann tensor of curvature

T(i,k) is the matter tensor.

Let’s suppose we have a distribution of matter, being concentrated in a very small area around a point O in space. Then we examine the curvature of space time at a point P. The distance between O and P is 300 000 km + 2 meters.

Without regarding the wave nature (traveling nature) of gravity, Einstein could have found and we could find that the curvature of space time at the point P is a solution C(i) of the equation (1). Just calculate the matter tensor and the curvature tensor.

Now at the time t1 we start moving such matter distribution one meter away from O to a point B, then stop moving this matter distribution at the time t1+1 second while keeping the geometrical shape of this matter distribution unchanged.

1) At the time t1+1, if General Theory of Relativity is to be used as presence, we could have found a new solution C(n) of space time curvature at the point P just by applying again the equation (1) for the matter distribution at the point B. This is the instant interaction that even Einstein had not escaped its bound when he forwarded his General Theory of Relativity.

2) By the very basics of Special Theory of Relativity, we can state that if a light ray was switched on at O at the time t1, this light ray would still be traveling from O to P and could not have reached the point P at the time t1+1 second, then an observer at P at the time (t1+1s) was no way possible to detect any change of the matter distribution while we moved this matter distribution between O and B. (No information about a physical system can be transmitted and received at a speed that is higher than light speed in vacuum!)

Now the contradiction is very clear:

a) By argument 1), we could find the curvature change of space time at P at the time t1+ 1 second

b) By argument 2) of the very Special Theory of Relativity, we should not have detected (or more precisely, we could not detect) any change of the curvature at P, caused by the change of matter distribution at the time t1 +1 second.

By this very contradiction between the “General Theory” of Relativity and the Special Theory of Relativity, is the General Theory still “general” at all. And if the incorporation of General Theory to Special Theory produces a contradiction among themselves, can we have a right to revise carefully the theories of relativity?


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Is General Theory of Relativity really "general"?" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.