ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 138 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

PURDUE ANNOUNCES FUSION PANEL FINDINGS
Posted on Thursday, September 27, 2007 @ 18:18:04 UTC by vlad

Science (AP) -- A Purdue University panel that reviewed misconduct allegations against a scientist who claims he produced "tabletop fusion" has concluded that "several matters merit further investigation."



...The panel's report of its work has been turned over to the Office of Naval Research, which financed some of Taleyarkhan's work, Bennett said. The university began its latest review at the direction of the ONR.

Purdue announced its most recent inquiry of his work in May, three months after an internal inquiry found no evidence that Taleyarkhan had engaged in research misconduct...

Full story: Taleyarkhan

Comments from the PhysOrgForum:

Googleplex writes: Quote: "He has come under fire since then because other scientists have tried without success to reproduce his fusion work."

Why not have him set up his experiment and show the other scientists? Then walk them through setting up a duplicate experiment.

This article lacks depth.

There is plenty of talk on-line about how to set up the Sonoluminescence experiment, how was his experiment different? I recall that he was able to detect a fusion footprint with his rig. Others dismissed the fusion footprint being due to detection eqiupment malfunction/background radiation/mistakes. How did the Review Panel address this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence
-----------

Marjorie Mazel Hecht writes: This case continues to be a witch-hunt against Taleyarkhan, based on national security classification efforts. For more on this story, see the editorial in the current issue of 21st Century Science & Technology magazine, "Taleyarkhan and the Pugwash Mafia."


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"PURDUE ANNOUNCES FUSION PANEL FINDINGS" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: PURDUE ANNOUNCES FUSION PANEL FINDINGS (Score: 1)
by newscientist on Monday, October 15, 2007 @ 19:24:19 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
What the papers and the detractors are conveniently leaving out (or refusing to admit) is that the experiments HAVE been successfully replicated, multiple times in fact.

Signed testimonies of successful replication from some of the detractors themselves are on hand. I just don't understand how/why those people are getting away with their false, disparaging claims.

Mr. Steve Krivit from "The New Energy Times" has investigated this controversy, and has even put together a detailed description of what is really going on here.

I looked into that, and after reading it, I just sat open-mouthed, baffled at the information that was staring at me.

Even the former HEAD of the department of nuclear engineering at Purdue University (who later became one of the detractors) was among those who had been involved in one of the SUCCESSFUL replication attempts of Taleyarkhan's work.

The former head (and other faculty in the nuclear engineering department) went against UNIVERSITY REGULATIONS and took their 'concerns for misconduct' straight to the press, instead of first taking it up with the university's Vice President for Research.

Not long after the initial allegations were brought forth, he unexpectedly 'resigned his position.'

That was rather sudden, don't you think?

There's more going on here than the papers are letting on.

I highly recommend reading that editorial that Ms. Hecht had cited above. I also recommend taking a good look at Mr. Krivit's work I had mentioned. It can be found at: Taleyarkhan [newenergytimes.com].

It really puts things in perspective.



Purdue panel finds misconduct by fusion scientist (Score: 1)
by vlad on Sunday, July 20, 2008 @ 23:56:12 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
AP) -- A Purdue University panel has found two instances of misconduct by a researcher who claims he produced nuclear fusion in tabletop experiments.

Full story: http://www.physorg.com/news135611730.html [www.physorg.com]



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.