With all respect to Otto and Roberto, they have achieved less than nothing. It is true, they did perform a great number of experiments and writing documentation. I am myself investigating the TPU and trying to replicate it. However, I have never claimed anything unless I have a proof for it. I am never ”screaming” looking for followers with absolutely zero proof. I am following that forum very closely and familiar with all Otto’s and Roberto’s posts. I have also seen all posted (and even some not posted) videos. And what?

In regards to Jason O's “successful” replication. Where did you see in the video any kind of overunity? Things like - “TPU is feeding my power supply. That is why you guys see the current/voltage increase higher than my power supply can give out” - not a precise wording but very close – mean a complete absence of basic knowledge in electrical/electronic circuits. Maybe it is time when one should finally learn how to subtract and/or add currents and voltages. Maybe it is time when one should learn if a power supply (as shown in the video) could be fed back at all. Such things are not more than a hobbyist show. That is not bad at all. It is bad when it becomes a proof of a mistaken claim or information.

So far, nobody has canceled basic knowledge and books have nothing to do with it except for that basic knowledge in electronics and electricity where the knowledge has been learned.

Steven Mark’s TPU is a great thing to learn and try but it is not for people that that keep talking about things without thinking first. And that is, unfortunately, the current situation with the majority of people investigating the TPU. I would like to invite more qualified people to that forum but I don’t want to see beginners claiming overunity and polluting that forum as it is of now.