ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 144 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

What Bohr's successes represent for Physics
Posted on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 @ 01:42:25 UTC by rob

WGUGLINSKI writes:
Nowadays the quantum theorists consider the Bohr’s successes as accidental, because they face the following dillema:

1- Bohr considered in his mathematical calculation that the electron is submitted to a centripetal acceleration in the instant when a photon is emitted by the atom. Therefore, according to the Bohr model, the centripetal acceleration on the electron plays a rule in his model of atom. And we realize that from Bohr’s theory the emission of photons is connected to the centripetal acceleration of the electron.

2- So Bohr model of atom is incompatible with the fundamental principles of Quantum Mechanics, because the centripetal acceleration cannot exist without a trajectory, and it’s well known that the concept of treajectory cannot exist in QM.

3- Therefore, in order to be 100% correct the hydrogen atom of Quantum Mechanics, it is required that Bohr’s model must be 100% wrong. Otherwise, if Bohr’s model has even a weak botton of truth (that is, if it is not 100% wrong), this imply that Quantum Mechanics is not 100% correct. And this is the reason why the quantum theorists claim that Bohr’s successes are accidental, which means that his model is 100% wrong.


But from the mathematical probability it makes no sense to consider the Bohr’s successes as accidental. Thereby something must be correct in his model, in spite of his theory is not correct. In another words, the mathematical probability shows us the electron is submitted to a centripetal force in the instant of photon emission, although we don’t know what such a fact means.






Theoretical implications of Bohr’s successes:

A serious physicist must realize that the hydrogen atom of Quantum Mechanics cannot be 100% correct, since such a fact is pointed out by the Bohr’s successes. And it means that something very fundamental is missing in Quantum Mechanics.

It’s unquestionable that a serious theorist must be agree that a new hydrogen atom must be found, in order to replace the hydrogen model of Quantum Mechanics.

And such new model must be able to fulfill the following fundamental premises:

a) It must be able to explain the Bohr successes, and why the electron is submitted to a centripetal force in the instant of a photon emission by the hydrogen atom.

b) As the centripetal force requires a corpuscular particle, the new hydrogen model must be formed by a corpuscular electron.

c) It must be able to explain why the hydrogen atom also behaves as the electron should be a wave-particle, as considered in Quantum Mechanics

d) From the items "b" and "c" above, obviously the new hydrogen model must be able to conciliate the Bohr theory with Quantum Mechanics.


These are the conclusions that a serious physicist cannot neglect.


The most theoretical physicists will continue breaking their heads, trying to find a solution for the crisis in Physics by keeping the prevailing attempt (trying to eliminate the inconsistencies of Quantum Mechanics by developing the Quantum Field Theory).

But sure that they will NEVER succeed in their attempt, and the reason is obvious: it’s impossible to eliminate the inconsistences of Quantum Mechanics by stating that the Bohr’s successes are accidental, as the theorists prefer to do.


CONCLUSION:

IF BOHR’S SUCCESSES CONTINUE TO BE NEGLECTED,
THE TROUBLES IN PHYSICS WILL NEVER BE ELIMINATED.


See also:

Successes of the Bohr atom
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Successes_of_the_Bohr_atom

Cold fusion, Don Borghi's Experiment, and hydrogen atom
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Cold_fusion%2C_Don_Borghi%27s_Experiment%2C_and_hydrogen_atom


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about
· News by rob


Most read story about :
Video: Zero-Point Energy (Philip Stott)


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"What Bohr's successes represent for Physics" | Login/Create an Account | 11 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

There is no violation of atomic theory just misunderstanding (Score: 1)
by Randy on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 @ 03:00:41 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
There is no violation of quantum physics rules if the hydrogen atom is considered to exist because of tunneling which is common in systems less than 9 nanometers in size. The hydrogen atom exists due to the virtual state and because it is supported by the process of being continuously regenerated in a process that takes place outside of normal time. There is no mistake, just a lack of understanding of common and universal laws. The truth exists without an understanding of the process. The hydrogen atom is virtual and is sustained by cavitation principles. Look up quantum tunneling in the Penguin book, "Encyclopedia of Solid State Physics". I would enjoy a discussion of this and even entertain ideas about this from Henry.

Ralph Randolph Sawyer




Our universe must be one of many. (Score: 1)
by Randy on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 @ 06:08:24 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Our universe is but one of many.

The centripetal force is not nearly strong enough to effect the orbital position of the electron. The only force strong enough to do this is the electromagnetic force. The electromagnetic force must be turning on and off at a fantastic rate for there to be a change in strength of this force that is noticeable at all. That is why there is a hysterisis effect on magnetic domain changes. The magnet is a switch. Atomic forces applicable to orbital changes must include deflection, that is needed for there to exist any precession of electron position. This must involve tunneling and time changes that are interdemensional. The electron pops into being through a doorway to a parallel dimension, temporarily exists for a very short period and returns to its origin. Every object that we perceive as actual must be virtual and sustained indefinitely and recreated indefinitely due to this tunneling from another dimension. The orbital position cannot be determined because the electron is everywhere in the probability zone simultaneously. The electron pops out of our dimension and is back into it before it left. This is the effect of the piezoelectric properties of dielectrical systems. These effects include mass cancellation and exponential and unlimited acceleration. These are the known properties of piezoelectric material. The dielectrical properties of the hydrogen atom is evident but not yet recognized.  Ralph Randolph Sawyer




We just made a zero on the test. (Score: 1)
by Randy on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 @ 10:23:49 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
The orbit of an electron probably is not circular if acceleration and deceleration is taking place as part of the nature of atomic forces and atomic energy. Some have observed a direct relationship between allowed orbits and allowed energy levels. They coincide exactly and that is part of the disagreement as it is believed that this agreement is not accountable using both views of the atom. Neither view: particle or wave is entirely correct. It could not happen. Neither view is 100 percent true. The right answer is that the atom is entirely a vibration of a massless point object. There can be no mass according to theory. At least, the mass can not be measured, and this view is accountable as an observation of piezoelectric objects. The vibration is outside of normal reactions and has the mass of the process cancelled. This is entirely the view of piezoelectric objects and no other objects. So, atoms must be at least partly piezoelectric as otherwise their existence could not have any explanation. We just have to accept that other dimensions are involved in the process, but we do not need to know exactly how the process works or is even possible. So, we just need to accept Walter Cronkite’s condition of argument and say, "And that’s the way it is!"  Just accept the universe as you find it. There must be no further argument. We just need to get on with the job of applying the two theories and putting them down to experience and observation and accept that a mistake was made somewhere. We just made a zero on the test.  Ralph Randolph Sawyer




I had a book. (Score: 1)
by Randy on Thursday, May 15, 2008 @ 01:38:18 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
I wrote a short book that I hoped would help the world survive the present situation. I called this book, ""An Emergency Plan to Repair the Ozone Layer by Learning to Solve World Problems using the Science of Symbiotics a Basic Plan." I had a printed copy in my mother’s house somewhere, and there was a copy in the pickup. I only sent out two copies of this book, one to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by way of the World Meteorological Organization in Switzerland, and I sent one copy to the Clinton Global Initiative and received a nice reply from Bill Clinton. The book filled the entire envelope and was 57 pages of what I thought was very useful information, but the plan would have shut down the economy as the motor that I designed was nothing more than a hollow dielectric sphere with attached magnets. They could have figured out the rest of the process easily. This is not rocket science. And we have no rocket scientists in Washington D.C. but we do have rocket fuel in our water supply. Our water supply is totally polluted unnecessarily. We do not need any fuel at all to make use of magnetic propulsion. Ralph Randolph Sawyer




What is cavitation? (Score: 1)
by Randy on Friday, May 16, 2008 @ 04:58:08 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Cavitation is the formation of bubbles in a fluid that is at a low pressure due to an oscillating energy such as ultrasound. Ultrasonic cleaning baths make use of the proper frequency of vibratory energy and produces a cleansing bubble bath. There is a lot of water in the universe. Water is the stable state of quasi free hydrogen. Hydrogen does not normally exist in a free state, but when extraordinary conditions are met, hydrogen is formed and automatically recombines with oxygen. The recombination process releases the energy that was accumulated by the dissociation process. These conditions are often met in free space under conditions of reduced gravity. This is a totally natural process that takes place every day and is prevalent and sometimes ubiquitous under conditions that are required for the process.




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.