 |
There are currently, 123 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
GWE news
Posted on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 02:37:06 UTC by vlad
|
|
Despite being almost totally ignored by the mainstream media or mostly unfavorable comments by those asked to comment about the GWE/WEM claims, they’re still ticking like the Energizer Bunny of the new-energy revolution movement. “Alea Iacta Est” (the dice are thrown), the NDAs are in the mail for signing (by the successful license applicants) … soon we’ll see who are the winners and who are the losers…
"Genesis World Energy and World Energy Management extend our gratitude for your patience. We received an enormous worldwide response and the level of excitement generated due to this innovative opportunity has been overwhelming.
Our team has carefully reviewed every preliminary proposal submitted. Your comments regarding your vision and desire to make this a better world have made it easier to finalize our selections.
We have attached a PDF file of our non-disclosure agreement. Please print this form and read the information carefully. This agreement requires your signature, notarization and a current copy of your photo identification. After completing all of the necessary information, please mail the documentation by May 2, 2003 to:
World Energy Management, LLC
....
As soon as we receive your non-disclosure agreement, we will contact you regarding the next phase.
Warmest regards,
World Energy Management"
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 4.4
Votes: 10
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: GWE news (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 09:02:57 UTC | I heard that Nexus magazine had an article on GWE. Has anyone seen this article? I was trying to order a back issue I think its Volumn 10 Issue 2 but ordering from the web site gives me an error. I do find it very bizzare that main stream media has not covered this device. Invastigative or otherwise. This could make a monumental impact on everything that is energy and yet not a single mention. Well maybe the local NBC news channel in Boise, Idaho but thats it. Not CNN, bloomberg, or any of the news giants. Maybe the oil tycoons are controlling the media too. Its far fetched but anything can happen when it comes to money and power.
What does happen after the NDA's are signed, Do the new licensees get the blueprints and independant lab tests and test devices? I assume there is a period after the May 2nd deadline for licensees to verify the claims of GWE. That should be the moment of truth for GWE. Thats when the overall question will get answered, "Is GWE a scam or not?" |
- Re: GWE news by Anonymous on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 13:51:09 UTC
- grammar by chipotle_pickle on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 14:05:37 UTC
- Re: grammar by Rocketjet on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 14:36:29 UTC
- Re: grammar by Anonymous on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 14:39:57 UTC
- Re: grammar by Anonymous on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 14:45:02 UTC
- Re: GWE news by vlad on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 17:57:52 UTC
- Re: GWE news by bender772 on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 19:15:45 UTC
- NDA by Anonymous on Monday, February 02, 2004 @ 19:04:19 UTC
|
|
Indepenent Lab confirms GWE's claims (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 20:20:08 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | Nether Wallop Times
Islay Scotland – Physics Professor Peat N Barley of the Metroplitan University of Nether Wallop has released the results of an independent test performed by the University that completely validates the claims made by Genesis World Energy for the Edison device. Barley initially leaked the report in error, as he has had some difficulty adjusting to the surroundings of the still where he is spending his sabbatical. However, as the whiskey is out of the bottle, so to speak, Barley agreed to communicate on the record.
Times: Professor, can you tell us a little about the tests.
Barley: We set out to test the 3 main claims for the Edison
1 – That the gCell converts water to a molecular state using very little energy;
2 – That the residential version of the device produces 30 kilowatts per day of power, and can do so for 20 years;
3 – That the commercial version of the device can produce a total of 100 kilowatts of energy.
The Edison passed all these tests with flying colors. Unintentionally, we also tested the leak detection and localization controls of the device.
Times: Tell us about the gCell test
Barley: We found that the gCell performs better than GWE claims. With no energy input at all, all water applied to the gCell is expelled in a molecular state. There was no plasma, no 5th state matter. Only plain molecular water came out of the gCell.
Times: Very interesting. Can you tell us about the 30 kilowatts per day of power.
Barley: We ran the device for 10 days. At the beginning of the first day, the Edison produced –300 kw of power, apparently converting it all to waste heat. It was *hot*.
Times: You mean it drew 300 kw.
Barley: Produced negative, consumed positive, however you want to say it. GWE says the Edison produces 30 kw per day of power, and we saw the power generation increased by 30 kilowatts per day. At the beginning of the second day, it was drawing only 270 kw, on the third day, 240. By the end of the 10th day, it was not drawing any power at all. We’re sure it could continue like that for even longer than the 20+ years claimed by GWE.
Times: Did you ever see positive power output from the device?
Barley: No. We were able to validate 10 days of 30kw per day of power increase, but at the end of the 10th day, we inadvertently tested the leak detection system. Some haggis boiled over its pot and put out the flame on the stove. The Edison immediately recognized the leak, even though it was inside the house, while we were in the garage, and stopped working.
Times: This was just when the power output had climbed to 0.
Barley: Yes.
Times: Were you able to continue your test?
Barley: After the safety mechanism was reset, the power output went back to –300kw. This was about the time that I was to leave Nether Wallop for my sabbatical on Islay, so my assistant and I decided to take it with us. This is when we accidentally tested the self-destruct feature. We had a different understanding of “sovereign nation” than GWE. Since there is but one Queen for all of Britain, we thought we could transport this device to Scotland, but GWE counts England and Scotland as distinct countries. Once we took the device to Islay, the Edison never worked again.
Times: You mean moving it from one part of the UK to another broke it?
Barley: It’s a simple geography mistake on GWE’s part. Let’s not pick nits.
Times: How did you test the claim of 100 kilowatts of energy for the commercial version of the device?
Barley: We did not have access to a commercial device. We noticed that it had a high center of gravity, and could be tipped over. Properly geared, the gravitational potential alone would provide 100 kilowatts of power for a sufficiently short period of time.
Times: Well of course. The critics seem to be completely unaware of the math of the situation.
The Times contacted some of the more vocal critics of GWE. Reached in Philadelphia, Eric Krieg stated, “While I completely accept Barley’s results, this result does not qualify for my $10k free energy challenge prize, since that prize is very clearly for the production of 1.5 kw for an extended period in my garage.” Just like a skeptic to hide behind the side issue that his garage is not in England. In San Diego, John Lichtenstein said, “I’ll have to digest more of Islay’s peat and barley before I’ll be able to comment.” Indeed.
|
|
|
Re: GWE news (Score: 1)
by aironoeus on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 @ 21:21:02 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Just posted on website 05/11/05
Here is a very detailed description of the various licenses and how they operate and how you'll make and sell the devices.
http://www.genesis-scientific.org/licensing/licensing_overview_ATM.htm
Looking good. They are updating on a regular basis now. I'm glad I spoke up, a year or so ago, about making an atmospheric water collector to go with the devices. Hi hope someone listened.
AironeousB
|
|
|
|
|
