ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 107 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Energy Science

Energy21

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs

KeelyNet

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
KeelyNet_News
NextEnergyNews
PESWiki/News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy2000
Free_Energy
Greenglow
JLNLabs
KeelyNet
NuEnergy
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Sweet-VTA
Tapten
Tomorrow-energy
Vortex
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
radioioAmbient

Screwing Pressurized Aether out of the Background Electron-Positron Sea
Posted on Tuesday, January 26, 2010 @ 23:12:08 EST by vlad

Devices FDT writes: The centre of mass of a spinning gyroscope hangs well over the edge of the pivot, but it doesn't fall. Yet if we restrict ourselves to the forces that are officially recognized in modern classical mechanics, it should fall because there is no recognized gyroscopic force that would prevent it from falling. The mere fact that the gyroscope is spinning should have no bearing on the issue. The centre of mass is clearly hanging over the edge, and so the gyroscope should fall whether it is spinning or not. Modern physics tries to cover up this inadequacy by diverting attention to issues surrounding the conservation of energy. A Lagrangian treatment of the problem shows that the motion is consistent with the conservation of energy, and so all is then considered to be well. But the actual gyroscopic force itself that keeps the gyroscope from falling is not officially recognized to exist. Yet of course it must exist, and furthermore, it needs something to push against. Unfortunately, the medium that the gyroscope pushes against is also denied in modern physics.

This medium doesn't appear to have any effect on a gyroscope that is in a state of free fall, but it does reverse the direction of a rotating rattleback (Celtic stone). We will assume that this medium is indeed the luminiferous medium of tiny aethereal vortices, and that each vortex possesses a source and a sink. In other words, the medium is a dense array of electrons and positrons. When the medium is disturbed by translational motion, rotational motion, or by electric current, more aether pressure will be screwed out of the positrons. This additional pressure will of course be inertia or kinetic energy, or in the case of electric current, it will be magnetic field. The inertia will exert a pressure all around the moving body. If the body is spinning as well, there will be an additional centrifugal pressure field. Centrifugal pressure is yet another concept that is denied by modern physics. Providing that the body is spinning about a symmetrical axis, this centrifugal pressure field will be irrotational in that it will be in the radial and axial directions only, and it will be generated by the alignment of the molecules of the spinning gyroscope due to the electron-positron wind that will be blowing through it as a consequence of the spin.

If however we subject the spinning gyroscope to a forced precession, we will change the angle of attack of the electron-positron wind, and the molecules will realign asymmetrically. The asymmetry will then induce a vorticity into the centrifugal pressure field. The inertial pressure that arises due to the forced precession will then be twisted due to the vorticity, and a Coriolis force will be induced such as to deflect the gyroscope sideways by pushing against the electron-positron sea as a whole. This deflection will be analogous to the sideways deflection of a comet as it gets closer to the Sun. This sideways deflection, caused by inertial pressure, prevents the comet from falling into the Sun.

As regards the rattleback (Celtic stone), it rotates about an asymmetrical axis. The internal molecules cannot therefore align into a stable symmetrical pattern. Hence there will be a vorticity in the centrifugal pressure field of the rattleback, and as such, the inertial pressure of the motion will be curled and cause a Coriolis force that reverses the direction of the rattleback by pushing against the electron-positron sea as a whole. For more information, see "The Physical Nature of the Coriolis Force" at,

http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe63.pdf

David Tombe


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Devices
· News by vlad


Most read story about Devices:
Overunity magnet motor released !


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Screwing Pressurized Aether out of the Background Electron-Positron Sea" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.