Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 118 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science


Energy Science



Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs


New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field
Posted on Thursday, July 01, 2010 @ 12:23:02 EDT by vlad

Science FDT writes: One of the standard objections to the existence of a luminiferous medium is the fact that it would cause friction in space and hence cause the planets to fall into the Sun. What is never considered is the fact that such a luminiferous medium might actually be the cause of the inertial forces that give rise to Kepler's laws of planetary motion, rather than undermining these laws. The electromagnetic wave equation involves Ampère’s circuital law in its derivation, and so it is impossible to consider an electromagnetic wave at a point deep in space without considering the electric circuit that is involved in the displacement current. For Maxwell, his tiny molecular vortices acted as that electric circuit, yet nowadays, Maxwell's equations have been cut adrift from their foundations in the vortex sea, and the speed of light has been allowed to float. It is suggested here that Maxwell's molecular vortices do in fact pervade space, making space about thirty-two times more dense than lead.

Since this vortex sea is not strongly bonded to atomic and molecular matter, being able to flow through it as like water through a basket, it follows that this high density medium will not show up on weighing apparatus, because the apparatus only pushes against the atomic and molecular matter.

It is suggested here that Maxwell's molecular vortices are more accurately represented with rotating electron-positron dipoles that bond together in a double helix fashion, such that the rotation axes trace out magnetic lines of force. For more information see 'The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field' at,


David Tombe



Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad

Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

"The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field (Score: 1)
by Fran (froarty572@comcast.net) on Thursday, September 02, 2010 @ 12:27:03 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.byzipp.com/animaTime.htm
David, I think the luminiferous medium exists on the time axis, and has relative motion to our 3D plane which we define as C. It doesn't matter what "rate" the relative motion is... we as inhabitants of a 3D plane will always perceive it as C because our clocks and rulers are scaled by this motion. hence relativity, the pythagorean relationship for deriving gamma and the failure to detect an etheric drift by M&M

Re: The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field (Score: 1)
by WGUGLINSKI on Friday, September 03, 2010 @ 10:38:46 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
the standard objections are against the existence of a LUMINIFEROUS medium.
If you consider that the medium is luminiferous, in the sence that it propagates waves, such a hypothesis is unacceptable, as Einstein has proven.
The propagation of light in such a luminiferous medium would be similar to a propagation of waves in the surface of a lake.  Such concept of medium is disproved by Michelson experiment.

However, a non-luminiferous medium is an acceptable hypothesis.  By considering that the photon is not a wave , but actually it is a particle constituted by a particle and antiparticle that move with helical trajectory, the medium where the photon moves is not a medium where a wave moves.
The rotation of the particle and antiparticle explains the transverse propagation of light, and the helical trajectory explains why such particle as the photon has undulatory feature.

Michelson experiment did  NOT prove that the aether does not exist.  His experiment actually has proven that the LUMINIFEROUS aether does not exist.
The aether as a non-luminiferous medium is compatible with the Michelson experiment.

When Einstein understood his error, he tried to bring back the aether to Physics again, as tells us the book "Einstein: his life and universe", by Walter Isaacson.
Einstein understood that the concept of aether is not incompatible with the General Relativity, in spite of it seemed to be incompatible with the Special Relativity (because Einstein considered the aether as luminiferous). 
Then he started to find a new concept of aether, able to conciliate the Special and the General Relativity, concerning the question of the medium.

Unfortunatelly, it was too late.  Even Einstein did not succeed in bringing back the concept of aether to Physics again.


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.