Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 153 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science


ECW E-Cat World


Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times



Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

... and Schrödinger wins the duel
Posted on Monday, August 23, 2010 @ 10:10:47 GMT by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: Along the development of Quantum Mechanics in the 20th Century, there was a dispute Schrödinger versus Heisenberg, because the first one did not accept the interpretation that Bohr and Heisenberg proposed for the theory.

According to Heisenberg, a theory had to be developed free of metaphysical concepts.  When Schrödinger discovered the zitterbewegung in the Dirac's equation of the electron, he interpreted it as a physical phenomenon, according to which the electron would be moving with helical trajectory.

But a helical trajectory is a metaphysical concept, and from Heisenberg's philosophical viewpoint it could not be accepted by the scientific criterion.

So, while Schrödinger believed that Physics must be developed by keeping some fundamental physical concepts underlying the phenomena, unlike Heisenberg considered it disagree to the scientific criterion, from which any metaphysical concept would have to be eliminated in the development of a theory, in order that Theoretical Physics would have to be developed from mathematical concepts only.

The most physicists followed Heisenberg's criterion. and so the scientific community has considered the zitterbewegung as an abstract mathematical concept, with no physical meaning:

"A reformulation of the Dirac theory shows that zitterbewegung need not be attributed to the interference between positive and negative energy states as originally proposed by Schrödinger.  Rather, it provides a physical interpretation for the complex phase factor in the Dirac wave function generally" (see also Zitterbewegung by Quantum Field Theory Considerations - Zhi-Yong Wang, Cai-Dong Xiong )

Such interpretation of zitterbewegung, according to the Heisenberg's scientific criterion, is today incorporated to Quantum Field Theory, the successor of Quantum Mechanics.

The duel Schrödinger versus Heisenberg is not taught in the universities, because the professors try to hide from the students that Schrödinger disagreed with the philosophy of Quantum Mechanics.

The dispute between the two geniuses is described in the book THE MISSED U-TURN, the duel Schrödinger vs Heisenberg , by W. Guglinski.  The Telesio Galilei Academy of Sciences decided to publish the book in 2009, in a partnership with a publishing house of London.  But due to financial crisis of that year, the publishing house had troubles, and the publication was canceled.

The book THE MISSED U-TURN was published in Brazil in October-2008 by the Editora Bodigaya, but the editor decided to change its title, and so he published it with the title A EVOLUÇÃO DA M ECÂNICA QUÂNTICA- o duelo Schrödinger vs Heisenberg (see it the link of Bodigaya).

Now a new experiment shows that Schrödinger wins the duel: the experiment shows that photons have helical trajectory. 

This new experiment was published in Phys. Rev. Letters in July 2010, under the title “Unveiling a Truncated Optical Lattice Associated with a Triangular Aperture Using Light's Orbital Angular Momentum

So, this new experiment with the light shows that, concerning the zitterbewegung concept, Quantum Field Theory is wrong.  The successor of Quantum Mechanics is not correct, since QFT does not consider the zitterbewegung as a physical helical trajectory of elementary particles.

Along the upcoming years, new experiments will show that electrons have helical trajectory too, in the physical sense as proposed by Schrödinger.  He is the winner of the duel.



Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad

Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

"... and Schrödinger wins the duel" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

quantum computer will never be constructed (Score: 1)
by vlad on Monday, August 23, 2010 @ 10:17:29 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
WGUGLINSKI writes: For a quantum computer to run, it depends on the quantum phenomenon named entanglement.
Then, if entanglement does not exist, then a quantum computer cannot work.

So, the question is : is entanglement actually real, as claimed by the physicists ?

Entanglement Sudden Death (ESD)

The physicists claim that quantum entanglement has been confirmed by several experiments. However those experiments have been interpreted from the foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Then the question actually is: are the foundations of Quantum Mecanics correct ?

When the researchers tried to apply the entanglement for the development of the quantum computer, they discovered that something very strange happens: the entanglement misteriously disapears.

The theorists called such phenomenon as “entanglement sudden death” (ESD), and they believe that it happens because in Nature everything exhibits the trend of vanishing itself.

However the actual meaning of ESD is another one: it just shows that entanglement does not exist. And when the physicists try to apply it to the construction of a computer, the machine cannot work, because the entanblement exists only in the theories of Quantum Mechanics, it does not exists in Nature.

Herein we will undestand the reason why the physicists believe that there is sudden death of entanglement, and we will also understand why entanglement actually does not exist, as shown in the book Quantum Ring Theory.

See article in Peswiki: 
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:quantum_computer_will_never_be_constructed#.27.27.27References.27.27.27 [www.zpenergy.com]

Einstein was right! (Score: 1)
by mmfiore on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 @ 06:34:09 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Einstein was right about the shortcomings of Quantum Mechanics and so therefore String Theory is also the incorrect approach. As an alternative to Quantum Theory there is a new theory that describes and explains the mysteries of physical reality. While not disrespecting the value of Quantum Mechanics as a tool to explain the role of quanta in our universe. This theory states that there is also a classical explanation for the paradoxes such as EPR and the Wave-Particle Duality. The Theory is called the Theory of Super Relativity. This theory is a philosophical attempt to reconnect the physical universe to realism and deterministic concepts. It explains the mysterious.
http://www.superrelativity.org/ [www.superrelativity.org]

conspiracy: physicists against the helical trajectory (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, November 13, 2010 @ 21:33:45 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
WGUGLINSKI writes: I discovered that there is a fear among physicists on two figures of the book Quantum Ring Theory.

I posted the two figures in several communities of physics in orkut, and in all of them the two figures were deleted.

In the community OUR UNIVERSE, the moderator Frank deleted them three times:

The two figures were posted by me in topics with the title "books of Theoretical Physics in 2050" .  The two figures are the following:



Why are the physicists afraid of the two figures?

It's easy to understand why.

The successes of the Bohr model of hydrogen atom cannot be accidental, because such hypothesis is impossible, from the mathematical probability.
Therefore, in spite of Bohr model is wrong, however something is correct in his model.  His model cannot be 100% wrong.

But according to Quantum Mechanics, Bohr's theory must be 100% wrong.  Let's see why.

Bohr used the centripetal acceleration on the electron in his calculus, in the instant of a photon emission.  Therefore, according to his theory, the centripetal acceleration plays a role in the mechanism of the photon emission.

According to Quantum Mechanics, it's impossible to have a centripetal acceleration on the electron.  Because the existence of the centripetal acceleration requires the existence of a trajectory.  But in QM it's impossible the electron to have trajectory (because as there is attraction proton-electron, if the electron would be moving into the electrosphere of the proton, it would suffer acceleration, and it would have to emit a continuous spectrum, and it is known that the atom does not emit a continuous spectrum).

So, as it is impossible to have centripetal acceleration on the electron, then according to Quantum Mechanics the Bohr's theory must be 100% wrong.  Otherwise, if Bohr theory is not 100% wrong, then Quantum Mechanics cannot be 100% correct.

Therefore, Quantum Mechanics cannot explain the successes of Bohr.  And in order to consider that QM is 100% correct, it's indispensable to  consider that Bohr's successes are accidental.
Obviously the physicists have a paradox in the hand, because from the mathematical probability it's impossible to consider Bohr's successes as merely accidental.

The successes of Bohr theory are explained by considering the hydrogen model proposed in Quantum Ring Theory, which shows that the centripetal acceleration on the electron exists, but it is not like Bohr imagined.  The centripetal acceleration appears on the electron due to its helical trajectory.  This is shown in the two figures deleted by the physicists in the community of orkut.
The centripetal acceleration on the electron does NOT play a role in the mechanism of the photon emission, like Bohr imagined. 
However, the centripetal acceleration exists, like Quantum Ring Theory shows, and Quantum Mechanics cannot explain its existence.

The physicists try to hide from the people that Quantum Ring Theory has solved the mistery of the successes of Bohr theory, because Quantum Mechanics is unable to explain them.


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.