WGUGLINSKI writes: The particle theorists claim that all the particles predicted in the
Standard Model have been detected in experiments, except the Higgs
boson.
However this is not true.
The strange quark was not detected yet:
======================================== The
first strange particle (a particle containing a strange quark) was
discovered in 1947 (kaons), but the existence of the strange quark
itself (and that of the up and down quarks) was only postulated in 1964
by Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig to explain the Eightfold Way
classification scheme of hadrons. The first evidence for the existence
of quarks came in 1968, in deep inelastic scattering experiments at the
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. These experiments confirmed the
existence of up and down quarks, and by extension, strange quarks, as
they were required to explain the Eightfold Way. ========================================
So,
the theorists consider that the strange quarks existence has been
confirmed only because they are required to explain the Eightold Way.
There is not a direct experimental evidence. However,
the confirmation of the strange quarks existence is crucial for the
confirmation of the Standar Model too, because there is need to verify
the mechanism reponsible for the Strangeness.
The need to investigate Strangeness is considered by some researchers:
========================================
We
argue that there is an absolute need at LHC to measure strangeness
production in events with different multiplicities to possibly
disentangle relations and differences between particle production in p–p and heavy-ion collisions.
========================================
According
to Quantum Ring Theory, the electron's structure is constiuted by
two quarks "p" and one quark "q" (of course they do not exist in the
Standard Model; when I developed my theory, I supposed that the two
quarks p and q would be discovered in the future). According to my
theory, the quarks p and q that constitute the leptons do not interact
through the strong force.
But perhaps the electron's structure can be composed by two anti-up quark “u” and one strange quark “s”: its structure would be uus.
In
this way, the two sort of quarks proposed in Quantum Ring Theory are
not new quarks p and q as I supposed some years ago: actually they are
those well-known quarks: the anti-up and the strange s.
The
mass of the strange quark s is 101MeV, and at the first glance we could
be tempted to discard the hypothesis that electrons can be formed by
strange quarks, since the electron's mass is 0,5MeV. Nevertheless, the
mass of the quarks depends on their confinement:
======================================== The
masses should not be taken too seriously, because the confinement of
quarks implies that we cannot isolate them to measure their masses in a
direct way. The masses must be implied indirectly from scattering
experiments. ========================================
The positron's structure would be uu s
, and so from the electron-positron annihilation we had to expect a
phenomenon connected to strange quarks. Indeed, in proton-electron
annihilation analyses the contribution e(+) + e(-) → s s is well-known. Look at http://www.desy.de/~daum/frascati07.pdf [www.zpenergy.com]
Therefore the structure uus for the electron makes sense.
A lepton composed by the structure with strange quarks (as for instance an electron with structure uus)
would be the answer for the fact that leptons do not interact through
the strong force. As said, in Quantum Ring Theory it is proposed that
the quarks which constitute the structure of leptons have no interaction
through the strong force. Well, strange quarks in the structure of the
leptons can explain why they do not interact through the strong force.
In this way, the strong force could be considered as a manifestation of
the dynamic gravity (the particle theorists discarded such hypothesis
because the leptons do not interact through the strong force; if strong
force should have gravitational origin, the leptons would have to
interact through the strong force too, they argue). But considering that
leptons are formed by strange quarks it means that strong force would
be a kind of gravity interaction, and not a fundamental force of nature
as currently considered. Gravity and electromagnetism would be the two
unique fundamental forces (since the weak force is a kind of
eletromagnetic force)
If
the hypothesis that leptons are formed by strange quarks is really
correct, such fact can be the answer for many misteries not solved yet
by the Standard Model.
The
hypothesis that leptons have strange quarks in their structure could be
also the answer for many other questions not solved yet. Indeed, it's
possible that into the structure of some particles the strange quarks
exist in the form of strange mesons (for instance a meson us).
But into other structures the strange quarks are in the form of a lepton
(like the electron and the positron). In this case, the electron and
the positron have not their spin ½ when they are confined into the
structure of a particle, because they lose their spin due to the
spin-fusion mechanism: they behave like bosons when captured by some
particles, like happens when the electron is captured by the proton, and
they form the neutron with structure uud↔e, where the symbol ↔
represents the spin-fusion.
So,
the strange quarks can appear in two different ways when they are
confined within other particles: either they can take the form of a
strange meson (without spin-fusion mechanism), or they can take the form
of a lepton (which spin is zero due to the spin-fusion mechanism).
If the structure of the electron is indeed uus, then we realize that there is an interesting approach between Quantum Ring Theory and the Standard Model.
Perhaps
the experiments in the LHC can bring to light the structure of the
electron as formed by quarks, and hopelly a better understanding of the
Strangeness mechanism. | 
