Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 132 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science


ECW E-Cat World


Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times



Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Cold Fusion Researchers Say Biggest Problem Is Stigma
Posted on Wednesday, February 09, 2011 @ 22:38:23 GMT by vlad

Testimonials New Energy Times Magazine: CHENNAI (India) – The stigma of “cold fusion” is the field’s biggest problem, its leaders said at a press conference Saturday at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM).

The press conference was part of the 16th International Conference on Cold Fusion.

S. Kailas, president of the Indian Physics Association, Michael McKubre, an electrochemist with SRI International, David Nagel, a research professor with George Washington University, and Mahadeva Srinivasan, retired from the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, spoke.

The panel’s nearly unanimous opinion was that stagnation in the field has resulted from the stigma associated with its perception as pathological science.

“We are all trying to remove the negative picture,” Srinivasan said.

A panel of cold fusion researchers also spoke at a tutorial class on Saturday at the university.

Saturday’s panel comprised Michael Melich (research professor with the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School), Nagel, Yasuhiro Iwamura (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries), Vladimir Vysotskii (Kiev University), and Andrew Meulenberg  (a “cold fusion” theorist).

A second colloquium is scheduled for this afternoon at IITM. Nagel will present “Cold Fusion: An Emerging Energy Technology?” and Melich will present “Cold Fusion: Future Prospects.”

McKubre’s Explanation for Stigma
On Saturday, McKubre spoke about experiments performed 22 years ago by Bell Labs, MIT and Caltech that, he said, convinced the world that “cold fusion” was not real.

He explained to the audience that he now understands why those labs failed to replicate “cold fusion.” McKubre suggested that he now knows how to make “cold fusion” reproducibly, though he seemed pessimistic about its future.

“There is no irreproducibility of these experiments,” McKubre said, “There is only irreproducibility of the conditions.”

“I don’t know if cold fusion or low-energy [nuclear] reactions will ever turn into developed applications,” he said.

McKubre said that “cold fusion” papers don’t get published because of unfair treatment by journals.

He proposed that researchers in the field just “skip the science and go directly to engineering.”

McKubre said that the Department of Energy was not providing funding for the research. He discussed the stigma, which continues to be a thorn in the side of researchers.

Instead of the scientific route, McKubre suggested that using the media, specifically social media, would help the field gain recognition.

“How do we get this field recognized?” McKubre asked. “The other tool we have is social pressure, to engage the public, which has a vested interest in a new source of energy. The CBS ‘60 Minutes’ program was an attempt to engage the public.”

Deeper Explanation for Stigma
At the press conference, Srinivasan said the problem is much deeper than funding or irreproducibility.

“The problem is not funding. Funding is not the issue; it is one of perception,” Srinivasan said. “Maybe it’s due to the U.S. Department of Energy, which came to the conclusion that the phenomenon is not real.”

He referred to the 1989 Department of Energy panel that dismissed the idea outright. Mainstream scientists working on that panel dismissed the theory of “cold fusion” because it conflicts with well-established aspects of nuclear physics: 1) the lack of strong neutron emissions, 2) the mystery of how the Coulomb barrier is penetrated, and 3) the lack of strong emission of gamma or x-rays.

Ever since the Department of Energy rejected the theory of “cold fusion,” a group comprising mostly the same researchers has been attempting to get outsiders to accept that the theory of “cold fusion” is real.

Part of the difficulty has been the lack of experimental evidence for “cold fusion” – as fusion. There is also no credible theory to explain “cold fusion.” However, there is abundant evidence for another kind of low-energy nuclear reaction and production of nuclear products such as helium, tritium, transmutations and neutrons.

In spite of the stigma, lack of evidence and a viable theory, the leading researchers continue to favor using the term “cold fusion,” rather than low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR,) a term and concept which does not presume or assert “cold fusion,” though allows for its remote possibility.

A New Explanation: But It’s Not Fusion
Now, researchers are beginning to see “cold fusion” in a new light, possibly based on weak interactions. Srinivasan explained this at the press conference.

“What seems to be occurring is other nuclear reactions which don’t fall into the categories of fission or fusion,” he said. “All kinds of nuclear phenomena seem to be happening at room temperature.

“Something in the solid state seems to be catalyzing all kinds of nuclear reactions, with the beautiful difference that there is very little radiation. When we talk of nuclear reactions, we always associate them with nuclear radiation.”

“Now there seems to be a mechanism that happens with very little radiation,” Srinivasan said. “It’s almost a [completely] clean source of energy. … Somehow, the excess energy seems to be transferred directly to the lattice without emitting radiation.”

“One of the very interesting theories is from Srivastava, Widom and [Larsen], which tries to explain [LENR] in terms of the weak interaction and production of [ultra-low-momentum] neutrons. I think it’s a very interesting theory,” Srinivasan said. “I think we should take note of it.”

The group’s groundbreaking theory, published in the European Physics Journal C in 2005, suggests how energy may be released but gamma radiation suppressed. It proposes not fusion but a combination of weak interactions and neutron capture and requires no “new physics.”

The paper is called “Ultra-Low-Momentum Neutron-Catalyzed Nuclear Reactions on Metallic Hydride Surfaces.” Its authors are Lewis Larsen and Allan Widom. The duo also performed further work with a third researcher, Indian-born scientist Yogendra Srivastava, who now works in Italy. The trio recently published another peer-reviewed paper, this time in Pramana – Journal of Physics. [Download paper]

On Tuesday, Larsen, who was not at the conference, told New Energy Times that LENR can “potentially represent an ideal new low-cost, carbon-free energy source for mankind.”

He said that, until his group’s first paper published in May 2005, experimental results involving phenomena erroneously called “cold fusion” were theoretically inexplicable.

[New Energy Times has uploaded a few video excerpts to YouTube. More are on the way. Part 1 - Part 2]

Source: Cold Fusion Researchers Say Biggest Problem Is Stigma



Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Testimonials
· News by vlad

Most read story about Testimonials:
Dr. Eugene Mallove is dead

Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

"Cold Fusion Researchers Say Biggest Problem Is Stigma" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Experimental Progress Reported at ICCF-16... (Score: 1)
by vlad on Thursday, February 10, 2011 @ 22:59:22 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
New Energy Times Magazine: February 10, 2011

CHENNAI (India) — Japanese researcher Yasuhiro Iwamura, with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, reported more progress in his LENR transmutation research today. He also mentioned that Toyota Central Labs had successfully replicated his Cs -> Pr transmutation experiment.

The Naval Research Lab, out of Washington, D.C. continues to show an intriguing interest in LENR. Even more researchers from NRL have come here to present at ICCF this year. For the first time in a decade and a half, NRL researchers Dawn Dominguez and Ashraf Imam have reappeared in the conference series to give presentations. They have been trying to get excess heat in D/Pd electrolytic cells. No conclusive positive results, but they seem to be making a strong effort to get experience in the field.

The presentations by Dominguez and Imam were devoid of the cynicism that has been typical of NRL researcher David Kidwell in the past few years. Their experimental claims were very conservative and their efforts seemed sincere.

Italian researcher Andrea Petrucci gave a presentation on piezonuclear neutrons and transmutations. He and his colleagues had originally been working in a military laboratory but they lost access to the lab a few years ago. Petrucci told New Energy Times that the ENEA Casaccia laboratory has recently welcomed and hosted their research.

Source: Experimental Progress Reported at ICCF-16 [blog.newenergytimes.com]


American “Cold Fusion” Authorities Exclude Colleagues' Research

CHENNAI (India) – Two prominent American “cold fusion” authorities have excluded a proposed LENR theory from their public outreach presentation.

The Widom-Larsen Ultra-Low-Momentum Neutron-Catalyzed Theory of LENR [click.icptrack.com] received no mention by David Nagel, a research professor with George Washington University, and Michael Melich [click.icptrack.com], a research professor with the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, when they spoke yesterday at the Indian Institute of Technology – Madras. A half-dozen professors and 100 students attended the program, called “A Colloquium on Cold Fusion.”

Nagel’s talk was “Cold Fusion: An Emerging Energy Technology?” and Melich moderated a discussion called “Cold Fusion: Future Prospects.” Nagel spoke extensively about fusion and compared thermonuclear fusion to what he called “cold fusion” research. When he discussed theory, he displayed a detailed slide [click.icptrack.com] showing more than a dozen theories that have attempted to explain low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR)...

More: American “Cold Fusion” Authorities Exclude Colleagues' Research [blog.newenergytimes.com]

Rothwell Makes Pre-emptive Strike Against New LENR Textbook (Score: 1)
by vlad on Wednesday, February 23, 2011 @ 23:04:31 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Hi Vlad,

If you've not been following my work closely in the last few years, here's the bottom line: there is something nuclear, but it's not fusion. The response from the believers to my apostasy has escalated.

Self-described librarian Jed Rothwell, has tried, on behalf of a group of American cold fusion believers, to interfere with the potential publication of a college-level textbook I am planning to develop on low-energy nuclear reactions research.

Story continues here:


[blog.newenergytimes.com]Best regards,



All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.