ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 187 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The New GravitoElectroMagnetic Theory GEMT
Posted on Tuesday, November 08, 2011 @ 21:00:37 GMT by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: Suppose that Faraday should had not discovered the fundamental laws of the Electromagnetism. Well, in this case it would be impossible to develop a theory of electromagnetism by starting from the mathematical formalism.
For the development of a theory, first of all there is need to discover the fundamental laws, and after that to apply the mathematics so that to get the equations.

This is one of the problems of Quantum Mechanics. The quantum theorist have started its development from the mathematical treatment, and they inferred its fundamental laws from the interpretation of its mathematical formalism. That’s why some principles of QM are wrong, and must be replaced.


A new GravitoElectroMagnetic Theory cannot be developed from the mathematics, as tried by Einstein and other theorists. In order to develop a new GEMT there is need to discover the structure of the aether, and the laws that rule the behavior of the particles that compose its structure.

Faraday discovered the laws of Electromagnetism by making experiments. For the discovery of the laws of the Gravitoelectromagnetism, I followed the same procedure used by Faraday, with a difference: I did not make experiments, because it’s impossible to make experiments with the structure of the aether. Instead of experiments, I used the LOGIC, by trying to discover the structure of the aether taking in consideration my new nuclear model.

Quantum Ring Theory actually is not a theory. QRT is actually a SYSTEM developed for a description of the microscopic world. It’s a system in the same sense as Newton developed a system for the description of the macroscopic world. Newton started from EXPERIMENTS and OBSERVATIONS. For instance, from the observation of the planets moving about the Sun, proposed by Galileo, Newton arrived to his theory of gravitation.

I could not develop my system from the experiments, as Newton did. I had to use the LOGIC, together with the discoveries made in the field of Quantum Mechanics. So, in spite of I did not use direct experiments, however I had at my dispose several experiments made along the 500 years since from Galileo till Einstein’s Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. So, the discoveries made in the field of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity were fundamental for the development of my system.

As I said, a new GravitoElectroMagnetic Theory must be developed by starting from the discovery of the structure of the aether and the laws that rule the particles that compose such structure.

Obviously the theorists must have a point of departure, but it is also obvious that they cannot get such point of departure from experiments, and they cannot get it from the foundations of Quantum Mechanics.

What Quatum Ring Theory proposes is just the point of departure.

Therefore Quantum Ring Theory is not ready. It is only the begginning of a New System. I have proposed its new foundations, new models, and some laws that rule the working of the models.

So, QRT proposed the foundations of a New GravitoElectroMagnetic Theory, and it must be developed, like Maxwell and other theorists developed the foundations of Electromagnetism discovered by Faraday.

Quantum Mechanics was not developed by one person. Along decades several theorists (among them some geniuses as Einstein and Planck (in the begginning), Bohr, Heisenberg, Dirac, Schrodinger, de Broglie, Pauli, etc.,) contributed for its development.

The same must be made with Quantum Ring Theory. There are several experimental parameters to be obtained in laboratory, there are equations to be found, and new principles to be discovered beyond those ones already proposed by me.

Till now the physicists fed a big hope to confirm the current theories in the Large Hadron Collider. But the LHC is showing that prevailing theories are wrong. There is not any chance for Supersymetry anymore. And the chance to find the boson of Higgs seems to be exhausted.
Also, Rossi’s eCat is suggesting that there is need a New Physics, with new foundations.

So, after the physicists arrive to the definitive conclusion that LHC proved to be wrong the current theories, they will be obliged to face the inevitable: to look for New Foudations for Physics, by starting from the ZERO.

And the question is: where will they find the new foundations for a theory to be developed from the Zero ?

I hope they will start to consider the proposals of Quantum Ring Theory, soon or later.

I know that probably the most theorists will try to get the new foundations by keeping their old failed method of discovery. But as said Einstein, there is no sense to try to eliminate the crisis by keeping the same method which has created the crisis.

Quantum Ring Theory proposes a new method. Perhaps it can eliminate the crisis of the Theoretical Physics.


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 2.25
Votes: 4


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"The New GravitoElectroMagnetic Theory GEMT" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.