 |
There are currently, 75 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
E-Cat and cold fusion, open letter to Andrea Rossi
Posted on Tuesday, November 22, 2011 @ 22:14:04 UTC by vlad
|
|
 From focus.it/by Irene Zreick: Brian Josephson, Nobel prize winner for physics in 1973, highlights the UK energy departement (DECC) interest in Andrea Rossi's E-Cat and invites the inventor to reconsider the idea of a scientific test.
A new piece in the puzzle of Rossi's E-Cat, which is said to be able to produce power with a cold fusion reaction: UK energy departement (DECC) has taken an interest in this tecnology, and might even plan "further action", under some conditions.
In the exclusive open letter we publish here, Brian Josephson,
physicist, who stands by Rossi since the beginning, invites him to
reconsider the importance of a new, fast scientific test, after Rossi's
negative reply to Francesco Celani's offer.
Brian Josephson adds that he doesn't necessarily looks up to Celani's
offer (which, for secrecy reasons, doesn't match the refutability
standards DECC have indicated), but highlights the matter of the benefit
that could follow a scientific test....
Full article: http://www.focus.it/scienza/e-cat-and-cold-fusion-open-letter-to-andrea-rossi_C12.aspx
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
"I can't tell you because..." (Score: 1)
by Kadamose on Thursday, November 24, 2011 @ 00:20:34 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | This is getting ridiculous. Now Rossi says that he won't do anymore demonstrations, because to do so would reveal too much about his so-called invention, and thus not only would he become irrelevant, but the competition would be fierce. That's like a two year old saying to another two year old that he or she does not want to share their toys with anyone because, by doing so, they would no longer be the object of desire or envy. This kind of ideology is rampant everywhere -- and it needs to stop. Pardon my french, but Andrea Rossi needs to grow the fuck up.
What in the hell is the point of making contracts and trying to seek out vast sums of money when these parasitical, Illuminati bankers can print as much money as they want, whenever they want? There is no point; the game is rigged. And the only way to beat a game that is rigged is to not play at all. By releasing beyond-the-cutting-edge technologies to the world at no cost, we destroy the game, and this battle of endless servitude to these parasites is over. I really wish that people would wake up and see the wisdom in that, but with all the additives in our food, the fluoride and pharmaceuticals in our water, and the aluminum oxide cocktails from chemtrails in our air, the human mind is doomed to slumber and despair forever,
Let it be known that I am incredibly ashamed to be a human being - and I find it incredibly unfortunate for myself to have to share this planet with self-serving, delusional neanderthals who think that the universe revolves around them. It doesn't and it never will.
|
|
|
Defkalion - final energy catalyzer products to be revealed in 15 days (Score: 1)
by vlad on Tuesday, November 22, 2011 @ 22:51:20 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | Defkalion
not only continued our [energy catalyzer] program but we are almost
ready, with technology that is ahead of Rossi during a year. [translate.google.com]
Specifically, within the next 15 days there will be announcements and
initiated testing and certification by independent third parties. We
will present the final product - not just a laboratory prototype - with
all its subsystems to operate according to European safety standards. "
"And the catalyst? Isn't that supposed to be a Rossi secret ?"
All the technology used in devices Hyperion at the kilowatt level, and
systems at 1 Megawatt to 5 megawatt are our own design. They different
from those of Rossi" he replied. "As for the control, was already our
own design and construction, and Mr. Rossi has signed acceptance
certificate shows that it is ours. Even in the recent trial in October
when he used some modules of our own design. However, the main and big
difference in our device than that of Rossi is that our system is stable
in performance, while that of Rossi or the last test failed to yield
stable for more than five and a half hours. "...
More: Defkalion claims to have what they call final energy catalyzer products to be revealed in 15 day [nextbigfuture.com]
|
|
|
Andrea Rossi replies to Nobel prize winner Brian Josephson (Score: 1)
by vlad on Wednesday, November 23, 2011 @ 22:22:15 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | From FOCUS.IT website [www.focus.it] by Irene Zreick:
...
Andrea Rossi's reply to Brian Josephson
Dear Professor Josephson, I do understand your concerns, but as I already explained, I am not
going to give any other demonstration of the E-Cat because at this point
it wouldn't make any sense: we already got industrial manufacturing
underway and the E-Cat is a ready product for the market. Our customers
will buy a working device; if it didn't work, they wouldn't buy it.
Besides, I'm in such a busy and demanding stage that, even if I wanted, I
wouldn't have the time to arrange any test.
Please allow me to underline that professor Celani is not just a
scientist, but a competitor too. This is one of the reasons I cannot
accept his offer. The market plays by different rules than the academic
world, and even if I realize that a scientist needs to know and
understand the theory, I need to protect my invention, if not I could
lose my job. Please try to understand my point, I don't mean to
disregard the scientific needs. I would like to remind everyone that we
are working on that too: in my letter to professor Celani, I explained
that the university of Bologna is about to start a complete work of
research on the E-Cat; not to mention that the positive feedback from a
30 years experienced customer should drive all doubts away.
A question seems to be legitimate here. Why are you suggesting me to take Francesco Celani's offer?
Don't you think that a complete study from a university is precisely
what is needed, with regard to the theoretical and engineering develop?
Don't you think that, with regard to the scientific praxis and credits,
it would be more appropriate to rely on the university than on an
individual researcher?
In summary, I don't intend to give any other dimostrative test: the last
one has been the one of Oct, 6th. We are selling plants to customers
who run their own tests and decide whether to buy the E-Cat or not
relying on their results: they don't mind what's inside the reactor.
Meanwhile, the university of Bologna will take scrupulous care of the
scientific work. If the DECC, or any other public or private
organization, has taken an interest in this technology, I suggest them
to get in touch and discuss any possible business agreement with me.
Thank you for your support and your balance in pointing out to me such important and sensitive questions.
Best regards
Andrea Rossi
|
|
|
|
|
