ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 111 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

HOW LENR WILL PREVAIL
Posted on Saturday, March 16, 2013 @ 21:24:46 GMT by vlad

Science Posted by Peter Gluck in Ego Out: Now is the right time for LENR to emerge as a cutting edge nano-technology application that can be supported by an upcoming robust research and development nano-toolset.

Unfortunately, cold fusion has arrived decades too early when science and its practitioners were not ready or disposed to either explain or understand such a complex nano-process.

LENR has to dig itself out of a deep hole of public ridicule that this early discovery, ill-timed over-hyping, and under-performance as caused.


Furthermore, there is another unfortunate situation that also should be mentioned which has greatly retarded any progress in LENR research and its acceptance by the general public.

This inopportune happenstance is the ill-fated sense of competitive threat that LENR poses for the people who make their living from R&D and production of nuclear energy as well as the people who work to research the standard model of particle physics.

Their ultraconservative approach to their work lends them to apply to LENR the same sclerotic principles that block any progress in their own technology.

When the general public looks for an opinion from the nuclear or plasma physics community to help them formulate their judgment on the feasibility and the promise of LENR, this myopic public resource is ill-informed way beyond their expertise level to do so....

Full story: GUEST EDITORIAL: AXIL ABOUT HOW LENR WILL PREVAIL

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"HOW LENR WILL PREVAIL" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: HOW LENR WILL PREVAIL (Score: 1)
by dobermanmacleod on Sunday, March 17, 2013 @ 04:40:09 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message)
LENR will prevail when even one company markets a viable LENR generator.  Looks like Leonardo, led by Rossi, will be coming out with a one megawatt LENR generator within a year - they are said to already have the safety certification.  Also, it is claimed that soon a credible third-party verification of their so-called "hot cat" LENR technology will be published.

When LENR is demonstrated to be viable to the market, the Golden path will appear in consensus reality, and all those conservative CEOs will start devoting R&D to developing it.  Case closed.

BTW, did you see that mainstream media article that came out last week in Forbes?  http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2013/02/22/nasa-a-nuclear-reactor-to-replace-your-water-heater/

Also, there is reason to believe that energy companies are "divesting" so as to prepare for the imminent arrival of LENR onto the marketplace: http://coldfusionnow.org/oilprice-com-links-cot-and-new-energy-breakthrough/

http://coldfusionnow.org/is-it-finally-happening-supporting-evidence-for-a-big-shift-in-the-energy-market-caused-by-lenr/

http://coldfusionnow.org/is-it-finally-happening-a-big-market-shift-in-the-energy-sector-is-claimed/



FIFTH LESSON FOR YOUNG LENR RESEARCHERS (Score: 1)
by vlad on Sunday, March 17, 2013 @ 13:57:10 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Peter Gluck writes: My dear young friends,

Things change, that can be both excellent (e.g. when it is about progress (it is pleonastic to say “technological progress”; do you know other kind of real progress?) and a catastrophe e.g. when you realize that aging is not reversible. This time it is a change that simply makes me a bit sad.

My intention was to tell you about “reverse motivation” You are going to work in an awfully difficult field of research, I cannot convince you it will be fine and glory is waiting for you. On the contrary, just because it will be so bas, you who are special, a great personality in becoming, you will insist to work for LENR.

Please discover yourself reverse motivation. The best tools to explain this are the demotivational posters from http://www.despair.com [www.despair.com] really good managerial black humor and this site which I have used and admired for more than 10 years needs subscription now. I hope you will manage to do it.

I wanted to ask you, young colleague, to read first of all, the two most recent writings at this Blog. I am complaining about the past, but Axil shows the way to the future, your way.

I am also sending you three lists all coming from the fine Cultural Offering Blog to which I have subscribed with enthusiasm- it is really cultural in the best sense of this word. The author/owner Kurt Harden was so generous that he included Ego Out to the list of “25 Blogs Guaranteed to Make You Smarter” and I am reading the other 24 as much as I can. (I almost hear a whisper: “Alzheimer retardant, does it work?”

I advice you to discover the author of this writings, Nicholas Bate. The word excellent was created for him too.

Be bold 101: 
You need to be VERY bold!

Professionalism 101:
Good professionals are the real noblemen of meritocracy!
The architects of progress.

Get Lucky:

You will need plenty of luck too! Do you know it?

But I offer you a somewhat smaller supplement, too, in the spirit of reverse motivation:
51 ways to fail: For LENR, No 19 and 10 are perhaps the most efficient



LENR+ Manifesto and Plan. (sketch) (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, June 08, 2013 @ 10:34:50 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
From EGO OUT: A SERIOUS SITE RAISES THE MOST SERIOUS PROBLEM [egooutpeters.blogspot.ro].

See please:
http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/looking-for-one-reproducible-lenr-experiment#comment-16600 [www.buildtheenterprise.org]

I commented there:

It is a good initiative to discuss this vital problem of LENR here.

I also have analyzed it on my blog Ego Out and I invite the readers of BuildThe Entreprise to visit my blog or write me.

In my opinion:

a) the problem of bad reproducibility has to be judged in association with 2 other issues
weakness of the heat release and its short duration;

b) it is a "wicked problem" (see Wikipedia) even intractable if a high, say over 95% success rate is the target;

c) for the cradle system of Cold Fusion the Fleischmann Pons Cell the uncontrolled
and uncontrollable blockage of the active sites (a.k.a NAE) by gaseous molecules that are not deuterium coming from the ubiquitous air is the main cause of the bad function; add to this the low density of these active sites (valid for the systems with preformed smart and even smarter nano-structures)

d) essential- the situation has to be considered as absolutely intolerable. it is not a problem we can live with, a solution as to be found.

And it was found and is now developed on the principle that desperate diseases need desperate remedies, here desperate means radical. It is about the change of the mechanism by which the active sites are formed. The new systems imply the continuous formation of active sites in situ- a good equilibrium between the natality, activity and mortality of active sites. LENR+ adds a new dimension- time to the classic LENR systems.

See please the LENR+ Manifesto a sketch of this issue:

LENR+ Manifesto and Plan. (sketch)

1.  Situation: The field has PROBLEMS

2.  Cause:  It appeared too EARLY
   
3. Difficulty: Extreme COMPLEXITY

4. Solution: TECHNOLOGY first!
- No PURE SCIENCE!
- SCIENTIFIC METHOD not applicable.
- HYBRID METHOD necessary

5. No INNER SOLUTION found
-  Usual SYSTEMS hopeless
-  To destroy MYTHS, MEMES!
-  Radical PARADIGM shift.

6 OUTER SOLUTIONS emerging: LENR+

7 Task: to differentiate LENR/LENR+!
- LENR is discovery, LENR+ is invention,
- LENR and LENR+ have different mechanisms;
- LENR+ based on enhanced excess heat,
- LENR+ dynamic system of multi-stage processes;
- LENR+ is based on nuclear interactions, not reactions,
- LENR+ needs a productive meta-theory

8. Task: define, describe LENR+ mechanism;
to make hydrogen reactive and metal receptive
Polariton, Nanoplasmonics, Resonances -BEC, sequences…
Trans-theory in statu-nascendi

9. Task LENR+ R&D by HOLISTIC approach
- optimization performances/control, scale up, diversification

The solution is in development and the reproducibility problem will disappear as a bad dream.


Peter




 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.