ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 67 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (August 8, 2018 - August 12, 2018) COFE10 + TeslaTech Conference

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    Energy Science

    Energy21

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs

    KeelyNet

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.

    Panacea-BOCAF

    QVac_Eng

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    Alternative Energy News
    KeelyNet_News
    NextEnergyNews
    PESWiki/News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy2000
    Free_Energy
    Greenglow
    JLNLabs
    KeelyNet
    NuEnergy
    OverUnity
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Sweet-VTA
    Tapten
    Tomorrow-energy
    Vortex
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine
    radioioAmbient

    Loop-holes in EM Theory revealed by simple Thought-Experiment
    Posted on Saturday, April 13, 2013 @ 20:35:43 EDT by vlad

    Science DMB writes: Science must claim consistency in logic. If someone points out a logical flaw in the existing body of theory, it behooves us to look for answers. Some of those answers may in turn provide solutions to existing technological problems. The following is an excerpt from the patent application for the Hall-Effect Power Generator (US 20110241477 A1) which some here might find interesting in terms of providing more solid ground for challenging the Scientific Establishment.


    Field of the Invention

    1. The present invention relates generally to an apparatus for converting magnetostatic power to conventional DC electricity. More particularly, the present invention allows access to the internal Hall effect voltage within the London Penetration depth of a magnetically immersed superconductor.

    BACKGROUND

    1. The Hall effect power generator design idea discussed within this document is based upon long accepted understandings of the physics of superconductors, as well as understandings of the forces which account for the appearance of Hall effect voltages wherever electric currents and magnetic fields are directed normal to one another. Its operation suggests that certain gaps have existed in physical theory, namely that an electric charge or a permanent magnet actively radiates power into space which is unaccounted for by the conventional measure of electromagnetic power, denominated the Poynting Vector.

    2. A growing number of physicists and engineers have directed their attention toward such gaps in physical theory, sometimes discussed under names such as Scalar Electromagnetics, Zero-point energy, and others. An important aspect, relied upon by the present invention, is the difference between viewing the field of an electric charge or magnetic dipole as static (the conventional view) compared with a view of these fields as standing waves which, despite their constancy with respect to position, nevertheless radiate power into the surrounding space.

    3. To illustrate the notion of such fields being standing waves, consider the manufacture of a simple permanent magnet. Just prior to the completion of the manufacture of the permanent magnet, there is no magnetic field present, then an instant later a magnetic field does in fact exist and can be detected. Scalar electromagnetics would view this discontinuity of the magnetic field, with the dividing line between the pre-manifest and post-manifest condition not traversing the entire universe instantaneously (a violation of Einstein's restraint on speed of light), but rather radiating out into the space surrounding the newly-made magnet at a speed model according to both a transverse and longitudinal-wave inclusive form of Maxwell's equations.

    4. With the energy of the magnetic field associated with the manufactured magnet being zero just prior to its making, and then progressively increasing as the new field expands, the evidence that the magnet must in fact be radiating power becomes apparent. The alternative would be to view the information and energy resulting from the magnet's manufacture as spontaneously appearing throughout all of time and space instantaneously– a clear violation of the speed of light limitation imposed by Maxwell's equations as well as Einstein's Relativity Theory.

    End.

    I realize that in some senses, this could be seen as opening up a can of worms, but many may be comfortable with the meditative "don't know mind" put forth by Zen Buddhism.


     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 5
    Votes: 1


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "Loop-holes in EM Theory revealed by simple Thought-Experiment" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Loop-holes in EM Theory revealed by simple Thought-Experiment (Score: 1)
    by profraccoon on Friday, April 19, 2013 @ 04:47:29 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    What exactly is the inconsistency in the Maxwell-Lorentz (EM) theory?
    It is simple:  the Lorentz force does not satisfy Newton's third principle of force.

    Newton's third principle of force is as follows:  when a force F acts on a mass M and which is exercised by a mass M', a reaction force F' is present that acts on mass M'  such that  F' = - F.

    In particuar, in case of two NON PARALLEL current elements that show magnetic field interaction (assume there is no electrostatic field perpendicular to the currents), the Lorentz force acting on the first current element F  and the Lorentz force acting on the second current element F'  are such that:
       F is not equal to  -F'.
    because the magnetic field force is always perpendicular to the current elements.

    This always has been THE inconsistency of the Maxwell-Lorentz theory, which was well known to Pointcare, Weber, Von Helmholtz, Maxwell, etc ...

    Fixing this inconsistancy means to generalize the standard EM theory, by adding an extra scalar field and scalar field force,  such that the forces become BALANCED once more, according to Newton's third principe. This scalar field can  interact with the electric field, which results into longitudinal electro-scalar field waves.  Such waves might be an infinite source of energy.
    The way to do induce or receive this waves:  via pulsed power technology and lots of static charge.

    DMB does not define this inconsistency, and does not explain how to harvest the energy of static electric fields or static magnetic fields. I think the latter is nonsense. DMB cannot give us a definition of scalar field, nor does DMB know how an extra scalar field solves the inconsistency of EM theory.



     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.