ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 173 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Chava Energy

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Energy Science

Energy21

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

Interstellar Technologies

JLN Labs

KeelyNet

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

Unlimited electric energy

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
KeelyNet_News
NextEnergyNews
PESWiki/News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy2000
Free_Energy
Greenglow
JLNLabs
KeelyNet
NuEnergy
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Sweet-VTA
Tapten
Tomorrow-energy
Vortex
Magazine Sites
Distributed Energy
Electrifying Times
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
radioioAmbient

Missed z-axis in current nuclear models
Posted on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 @ 19:01:45 EST by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: According to the current nuclear models, the even-even nuclei must have two sort of shapes:

A- Spherical shape – when the quantity of prótons Z is the same of the quantity of neutrons N, Z=N.

B- Elispoidal shape – when Z very smaller than  N .

But experiments have shown that some even-even nuclei with Z<< N are pear shaped.

Then, how to justify it? After all, they would have to have an ellipsoidal shape.



In 2013 the Professor Peter Butler of the University of Liverpool had proposed that nucleons (prótons and neutrons) are distributed within the nuclei around a z-axis. So, in order to justify why some even-even with Z< Look the z-axis proposed by Professor Butler for the 88Ra224 in the link:
http://news.liv.ac.uk/2013/05/09/scientists-demonstrate-pear-shaped-atomic-nuclei/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A NEW HYPOTHESIS: THE EXISTENCE OF A 5th FORCE IN NATURE:

In order to explain the pear shape of Ra224, some theorists are now even supposing the existence of a 5th force in nature, which actuation is different for protons and neutrons, and by this way they expect to explain why protons and neutrons have different distribution in even-even nuclei.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

——————————————------------------------------------------------
On the existence of the z-axis by considering physical causes (missing in the current nuclear models):

——————————————------------------------------------------------

In the paper No. 10 of the book Quantum Ring Theory ( entitled CRITIQUE TO THE MODELS OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS ) it is shown that the existence of the z-axis within the nuclei is suggested by four different nuclear properties of the nuclei.

They are:

1st nuclear property – Null nuclear spin for even-even nuclei with Z=N.

2nd nuclear property – Null magnetic moment for even-even nuclei with Z=N

3rd nuclear property – Emission of alpha particles by uranium nucleus U238 with null angular moment

4th nuclear property – Incompatibility between current Nuclear Theory and the electric quadrupole moment of some nuclei

In the paper No. 13, entitled BETA-DECAY, it is shown that the existence of the z-axis is also suggested by a fifth nuclear property:

5th nuclear property – the preferential emission of the electron in the Wu’s experiment: the beta-decay of 27Co60 (WRONGLY interpreted by the nuclear theorists as a violation of the parity in the beta-decay).

Therefore, according to Quantum Ring Theory, there are five different nuclear phenomena suggesting the existence of the z-axis within the nuclei.

And now in the beggining of 2013 the experiment published in the journal Nature points out the need to consider a 6th nuclear property suggesting the existence of the z-axis:

6th nuclear property – the pear shaped nucleus Ra224.

CONCLUSIONS:
As we see, the Heisenberg’s phantasmagoric scientific method had introduced many serious inconsistences in the Nuclear Physics, as the conclusion that the Nature has preference by the left direction (the direction of the electron in the Wu’s experiment), the violation of the parity in the beta-decay, and the time reversion (a wrong interpretation by Christenson in 1964, when he and collaborators analysed the decay of the mesons K).

In the paper entitled A New Model of the Neutron published in Quantum Ring Theory it is shown that a model of nêutron formed by próton+electron does not violate the conservation of parity, as the nuclear physicists believed along the whole 20th Century, because when the electron loses its helical trajectory (due to its partnership with the próton within the structure of the nêutron) the electron loses its spin 1/2. Such mechanism of the spin lost within the nêutron is also responsible for a wrong interpretation by the nuclear theorists, because they believed that the parity is violated in in the beta-decay.

In the page 92 of the book Quantum Ring Theory it is written:

As we realize, because the physicists did not discover that the addition of spins is (seemingly) violated they transferred the problem for the parity. Instead of: “the addition of spins is violated in the beta-decay”, they say: “the parity is not kept in the beta-decay”.


The five nuclear phenomena which suggest the existence of the z-axis are described between the pages 125 and 133 of the paper Critique to the Models of Nuclear Physics, and between the pages 158 and 161 of the paper Beta-Decay, and they are exhibited ahead:


Page 125:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-55963400-1386630468.jpg

Page 126:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-62323200-1386630497.jpg

Page 127:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-16190500-1386630517.jpg

Page 129:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-94656200-1386630535.jpg

Page 130:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-14648900-1386630563.jpg

Page 131:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-01914100-1386630596.jpg

Page 132:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-37519700-1386630629.jpg

Page 133:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-52178100-1386630652.jpg

CONCLUSIONS in the paper “BETA-DECAY”:

Page 160:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-89477100-1386630681.jpg

Page 161:
http://www.scienceforums.net/uploads/monthly_12_2013/post-102616-0-05384200-1386630698.jpg


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Missed z-axis in current nuclear models" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.