ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 101 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (July 7, 2017 - July 9, 2017) Energy Science & Technology Conference
  • (July 28, 2017 - July 29, 2017) COFE-9

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    Energy Science

    Energy21

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs

    KeelyNet

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.

    Panacea-BOCAF

    QVac_Eng

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    Alternative Energy News
    KeelyNet_News
    NextEnergyNews
    PESWiki/News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy2000
    Free_Energy
    Greenglow
    JLNLabs
    KeelyNet
    NuEnergy
    OverUnity
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Sweet-VTA
    Tapten
    Tomorrow-energy
    Vortex
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine
    radioioAmbient

    Einstein, the greatest crackpot of the Physics
    Posted on Thursday, April 10, 2014 @ 22:47:29 EDT by vlad

    Science WGUGLINSKI writes: After the publication of his Special Relativity in 1905, Einstein became the greatest crackpot of the Physics. But in order to understand why, we have to learn what the name “crackpot” means when it is applied in the Theoretical Physics.

    In 1998 Rabbi Shlomo Riskin had defined what the designation “crackpot” means when it is applied to a theorists, saying the following: “When you’re one step ahead of the crowd you’re a genius. When you’re two steps ahead, you’re a crackpot.”



    So, first of all we have to understand what means one step in Physics, and what means two steps.

    Concerning to his scientific method of investigation, Newton said: “I do not do conjectures”. Then let us understand what the conjectures represent in the scientific method.

    Newton did not do conjectures because he used to prove his assumptions , via mathematics or by experiments.

    But the Newton’s discoveries were concerning of the macroscopic world, in order that he was able to conceive his assumptions based on observations and doing conclusions about them by using the logic. As the laws of the macroscopic bodies follow the logic, Newton was able to develop a theory by doing good conjectures which he was able to prove. And conjectures cease to be conjectures either when the author proves them to be correct, or when later experiments prove it.

    The genius in Theoretical Physics is the theorist who uses the Newton’s method, and his discoveries make the Physics to advance one step. He did not allow himself to do conjectures which he cannot prove. Therefore his discoveries are limited to the limitations of the Newton’s method, which was successful for the discovery of the laws of the macroscopic world, but is limited for the discovery of the laws concerning the elementary particles as quarks, photons, electron, etc.

    This is the step ahead experienced by the advancement of the Physics thanks to the contribution of the genius.

    Now let us speak about the two steps ahead which advances the Physics due to the contribution of a crackpot.

    In the 19th Century the physicists believed in the existence of the aether, and Michelson and Morley made an experiment with the aim to detect it, by considering that the speed of the Earth would have to change the speed of the light. But they did not succeed to detect any influence of the speed of the Earth in the light speed, and then in the end of the 19th Century the Theoretical Physics faced a breaking of a paradigm.

    When an old paradigm in science is broken by a new experiment, many “crackpots” start to make conjectures, so that to solve the puzzle.
    Einstein was one among many “crackpots” who were trying to decipher the puzzle of the Michelson-Morley experiment, and he faced a problem so much more complex than those solved by Newton, because the Michelson-Morley experiment deals with the photon. And the photon is an exotic particle which follows laws that cannot be discovered via the method used by Newton.

    Einstein was considered by the scientific community a crackpot when he published his Special Relativity in 1905. And he himself confessed to be a crackpot, because he wrote an imaginary dialog with Newton, where he said: “Newton, forgive me, because I was unable to avoid to do conjectures”.

    So, the own Einstein was shamed for his betrayal of the Newton’s scientific method, and he was aware that, by doing conjectures that he was unable to prove, he had accepted to become a crackpot, and that’s why he asked forgiveness to Newton .

    But of course Einstein had betrayed the Newton criterion on do not to do conjectures because he already had tried all the attempts avoiding conjectures, and finally he arrived to the conclusion that it was impossible to solve the puzzle of the Michelson-Morley experiment without to do conjectures. Therefore, Einstein decided to become himself a crackpot because after exhausting all the attempts without conjectures he finally realized that only a crackpot could be able to solve the puzzle of Michelson-Morley experiment, by betraying the Newton’s criterion on do not to do conjectures.

    Nevertheless it’s obvious that Einstein had proposed conjectures because he was hopeful that his conjectures would be confirmed later by experiments.

    So, we have to consider two sort of “crackpots” in Theoretical Physics:

    1- The crackpot whose conjectures are not proven being correct. He continues to be a crackpot.

    2- The crackpot whose conjectures are later proven being correct. He becomes a super-genius.

    However, a crackpot can propose a theory with many conjectures, and some of them can be proven later being correct, and other being wrong.

    Many of the Einstein’s conjectures had been proven correct along the years, and so he became a super-genius of the Theoretical Physics. But he also proposed a wrong conjecture: the empty space, which became a dogma along one century, but finally it was proven being wrong in 2011, by a new experiment published in the journal Nature:
    Light created from vacuum shows empty space a myth
    http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-11-19/science/30418928_1_vacuum-dce-photons

    As we realize, when the conjectures of a crackpot are confirmed, and he becomes a super-genius, of course along the years the scientific community forgets that he was a crackpot, because the physicists consider a shame to admit that to get two steps ahead in the Theoretical Physics is possible only because a crackpot decided to do conjectures unacceptable from the viewpoint of the scientific method. The physicists did not realize yet that two steps cannot be overpassed by a simple genius. Two steps ahead require a super-genius: a crackpot.

    Nowadays the Theoretical Physics is experiencing the most grave crisis of its History. Recent experiments along the last 5 years are requiring a New Physics, with new foundations missing in the current theories. Some physicists are proposing theories developed strictly according to the scientific method, trying to advance one step ahead the current theories. If one among them will have his theory confirmed by experiments and recognized by the scientific community, the physicists will consider him a genius. Other ones are proposing conjectures which surpasses the current theories two steps ahead. They are crackpots. If one among them will have his conjectures confirmed by experiments and accepted by the scientific community, he will become a super-genius.


     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 1
    Votes: 1


    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "Einstein, the greatest crackpot of the Physics" | Login/Create an Account | 13 comments | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Einstein was a FRAUD! (Score: 1)
    by Kadamose on Friday, April 11, 2014 @ 01:39:14 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message)
    Vlad, I implore you, please stop allowing posts like this.   Einstein was a zionist jewish piece of a shit who plagiarized other people's work and called it his own.   (And unluckily for us, he plagiarized the wrong people) And no, regardless of what WGUGLINSKI and others like him say, relativity has NEVER been proven in the lab or elsewhere.   That's where the smoke and mirrors come in to play -- whenever a variable doesn't fit into the theory, what do modern day physicists do?    They ignore it, and work around it.   By doing so, they prove the theory 'right'.   This is fraudulent on so many levels, it's sickening.

    WGUGLINSKI is very similar to the scammer who used to frequent this site years ago - Mark Goldes - you remember him?   The only difference between the two is WGUGLINSKI is not seeking money or investors; instead, he is trying to bible thump everyone.   The more people he converts and deludes, the more myopic we become in truly understanding the universe.   That is his game, and I intend to put an end to end it if you won't.





     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.