Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 65 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (August 8, 2018 - August 12, 2018) COFE10 + TeslaTech Conference

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science


    Energy Science



    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs


    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.




    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    Alternative Energy News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2014 @ 20:54:55 EDT by vlad

    Science Dr. Peter Gluck writes in Ego Out, his science blog: For LENR, lots of theories, few principles.

    Semantics is not quite an exact science; words have different and somewhat fluid meanings. A congress of philosophers  could not tell us what are the differences between a theory and a principle however when we are moving in a familiar territory of knowledge where theories abound and principles are not considered relevant & important- we can tell the ones from the others quite easily- just by looking at them; remember the pragmatic definition of pornography. “I know it when I see it”- principle.

    In the VUCA world of LENR, there can be intermediary states or hybrids of theories and principles. Theories are knowledge-oriented, more precise and detailed than principles, while principles are action-oriented, implying change.

    Theories are interesting and passive, principles active and useful- as a somewhat general rule.

    To the faithful readers of this blog is obvious that I have a passion to discover basic principles- see the “Twin Peaks’ and the “Sue-Ellen principle” (combined with the Kaltwasser doctrine) the Principle of the Chief Engineer and, especially the realistic and very practical technical principles of Defkalion Green Energies. My personal techno- moral principles-slogans as: “I think, I exist; I decide, I live; I solve problems, I live with a purpose” and “My favorite sport is swimming. My favorite metasport is swimming counter-stream” are – at least for me, proofs that principles are important. In the present case we need to find those principles that could contribute to the solutions of the wickedly wicked problems of LENR.

    But let’s discuss about LENR theories at first:

    May I tell here what everybody knows- theories have not achieved much, have not explained even basic facts, are not guiding experiment, do not have problem solving power. Despite these non-successes, many theories are beautiful impressive logical constructs and their authors plus some fans like them, promote them and oppose them to the competition.

    It happens that just now, a new theory, created by the most knowledgeable and reputed author of the LENR field is fighting for general acceptance and supremacy, having an excellent press and a lot of supporters. It is discussed on the forums, in many threads and it is the core idea of a book written just for the sake and for extended/deep presentation- of the theory- w by dr. Ed Storms. You can buy the book, “Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions” from here:


    and I advise you to do it- the qualities of the book are more important than any and all possible weaknesses of the new theory. The book is surely a treasure both for old cold fusionists like me happy to remember the great events of the past and to young LENR researchers trying to build a great future for a most interesting, however very special domain of Science...

    Full essay here: LENR- THEORIES OR PRINCIPLES?



    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad

    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

    Article Rating
    Average Score: 0
    Votes: 0

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Very Good


     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

    "LENR- THEORIES OR PRINCIPLES?" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    by vlad on Monday, August 04, 2014 @ 22:11:52 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
    Two more interesting posts by Peter:

    1. AN UPTODATED SWOT ANALYSIS OF THE E-CAT [egooutpeters.blogspot.ro]
    2. LENR AND NANOPLASMONICS [egooutpeters.blogspot.ca]

    Related to AXIL editorial, Abd ul Rahman Lomax writes:

    At 03:22 PM 8/2/2014, Peter Gluck wrote:

    >However, Homo sapiens must come with new ideas and revolutionary scientific thinking as does AXIL in this Editorial. I bet what he writes here will be taught in Univesrities in 2020

    I certainly hope not.

    The editorial starts with really poor and inaccurate definitions of fission and fusion, and then gets worse.

    This much is clear about cold fusion and LENR. It's low-energy. It is ''not'' the result of

    >The key concept that explains this mystery of LENR is extreme energy concentration at the atomic level and its precise focusing on a small volume of space.


    at all.

    Extreme concentration of energy is the mechanism of hot fusion. It produces hot fusion products, quite predictably. Extreme concentration of energy generates effects that are well-known and easily detected, and that are not detected with cold fusion.

    Notice the oxymoron in Axil's editorial: "LENR" is, by definition, "Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions." So if we were to assign any credibility to Axil's piece, we would want to look at how extreme energy comes to appear as low energy. He totally ignores the issue.

    Axil is anonymous, and writes pseudoscientific word salad, he is quite good at it.

    That editorial is a total dead end.


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.