ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 189 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Letter to JLN Laboratories
Posted on Friday, June 20, 2003 @ 02:03:16 GMT by vlad

Testimonials Dear Dr Naudin,

I am interested in your replication of the motionless electromagnetic generator, and refer you to the AIAS website www.aias.us for information on papers by the AIAS author group and myself relevant to the problem of extracting electromagnetic energy from spacetime.


My latest paper on this website shows that the source of such energy in general relativity is curvature R, and in the previous two papers (Found Phys Lett just published and in press) I develop new field and wave equations for grand unified field theory of all four fields.Your website provides many details of the replication, photographs, graphical data and so on, and so I assume that a satisfactory replication of the patented MEG has occurred in your laboratory. Evidently, sufficient details are available for replication by engineers.

Therefore the MEG appears to be reproducible and repeatable, and our work at AIAS explains the device in terms of general relativity. There is no violation of Noether's Theorem, electromagnetic energy from spacetime is available whenever there is curvature R and charge -e (regarded as a fundamental constant, the charge on the electron). There is no "point charge" in general relativity, the source of charge current density is R, and -e is a scalar C negative scaling constant.

The next stage is development and commercialization, and we at AIAS are setting up a company, one of whose aims would be commercialization of devices to extract electromagnetic energy from spacetime. I believe that Prof. Taishi Kurata's group is already pursuing development of devices similar to the MEG.

We at AIAS would be pleased to work with your company and Magnetic Energy Ltd. to develop the MEG commercially before the oil crisis really hits hard. Prof. Kurata has already indicated his interest in working with AIAS, and I have invited him to the Board of Directors of AIAS.

Cordially,

Myron W. Evans
(AIAS Director and Board Chairman).


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Testimonials
· News by vlad


Most read story about Testimonials:
Dr. Eugene Mallove is dead


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Letter to JLN Laboratories" | Login/Create an Account | 15 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Proper testing of an OU device (Score: 1)
by vlad on Friday, June 20, 2003 @ 02:30:15 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shelburne John W DLPC"
To: EMyrone@a...
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: Website www.cheniere.org/megstatus.htm


Myron,

I've tried to keep up with "replications" of the MEG. So far, none of the internet available material qualifies as a certification. Peer review does not require that all details of a device's operation be disclosed - this protects intellectual property. Peer review on the claim of greater-than-one ratio of useable output power to input power (COP>1) requires the following:

1.) Disclosure of the methodology of power measurement. It must be scientifically and industrially acceptable to peer review.

2.) A fully disclosed test of the device conforming to #1 above. Normally a nationally accepted authority (Wiley Labs in Huntsville, Alabama, U.S.A., for example) is tasked for this. The test and results should then be published in the open literature.

If this procedure is not followed, then this is fuel for skeptics to deny that the device is efficacious.

John
--------------

Message:
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:22:58 EDT
From: EMyrone@a....
Subject: For www.aias.us website : FPL "No Second Meal for Evans"


Message from Tom Bearden. What is now needed is an official independent certification of teh work by JLN Laboratories and Magnetic Energy Ltd. along the lines suggested by John Shelburne. This would silence the remaining sceptics. These are very few in number - the vast majority is positive. This can be seen from the millions of visits the Bearden website receives each year.

Unfortunately, there is some really vicious material on these websites which attack Tom Bearden and myself very badly in a manner that is completely unacceptable in any scientific debate or within any civilized community. It is good news that Naudin's device has been replicated independently. I have been subjected to many vicious ad hominem attacks for several years, for example one website proclaims

"No second meal for Evans"

Another website has a picture of Bearden dressed up as the late Iraqi propaganda minister. This is totally sickening, because Lt. Col. Bearden is a courageous soldier who served with distinction in Vietnam. It is this kind of vicious diatribe that caused my wife to become seriously ill with post traumatic stress, caused her to go into hiding, and which has completely destroyed my personal life. I have not been salaried for eight years, so I am lucky to get a pig's breakfast, let alone a second meal. These revolting people certainly make a pig's breakfast of the scientific, or any, kind of truth, and come straight out of George Orwell's "Animal Farm", where the pigs ruled, OK.

The formal scientific criticisms of B(3) theory stopped years ago, (i.e. higehr symmetry electrodynamics is now accepted as a theory), but there is one revolting paper by Waldyr Rodrigues that still has to be dealt with. If you want to hold your noses, it is:

A. L. Trovon de Carvalho and W. A. Rodrigues Jr., Random Optics and Stochastic Equations, 9(2), 161-206 (2001).

This was written when I was critically ill with major severe depression, and is a fifty page diatribe which like Shakespeare's Bassanio, is an infinite amount of nothing. Nevertheless I will draft a formal reply for publication.

This paper appeared in the literature without the knowledge of AIAS and is used by the pigs for propaganda. So I have toformally reply to it, however boring and irrelevant the criticism.




Possible MEG demo (Score: 1)
by vlad on Friday, June 20, 2003 @ 02:48:25 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Message: 14 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:25:19 EDT
From: EMyrone@a...
Subject: Fwd: Only demonstration needed for possible ORNL meeting

The main agenda of the Oak Ridge meeting is as just described to Bob Gray.

I refer your excellent suggestions to Tom Bearden, but he has already indicated that he will not be attending the meeting for personal reasons. However I would like to see these things with my own eyes.

I am very keen to see the MEG and Naudin's device certified independently as soon as possible, and the certificaton openly published; then to see these devices developed industrially within AIAS. I would like to see a scalar interferometer at work, and demonstrated at Oak Ridge, and I would like to see Sweet's device and Naudin's device demonstrated at Oak Ridge. If at all possible I would like to see the MEG certified independently before it is demostrated at Oak Ridge, and of course would like to see the intellectual rights of inventors safeguarded. I would like independent observers from AIAS (Bob Flower and Ellis Williams) to go to see Dr Kurata's industrial plants as soon as possible, and I would like to see all these devices patented and developed within AIAS, while making sure the original inventors receive all due royalties on patents and all devices manufactured and sold.

I am NOT keen to see axemen like Hunter or Rodrigues infiltrate the meeting, and that is the danger, and I am NOT keen to see the meeting loose cohesion, become too big and diverse, or become a heated controversy, as so often happens.




Myronic attempt at bullying (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Monday, June 30, 2003 @ 22:12:21 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
Tim Harwood reports that Evans is threatening legal action to close down the tombearden and nut_meg groups. Evans seems particularly agitated about their mirroring Trovon De Carvalho and Rodrigues (which he calls Rodrigues et alia), and insists that they stop mirroring that. Why should he care about mirrors when the original is available at

http://www.cptec.br/stm/preprints/waldyr6.PDF

This is really par-for-the-course with free energy nuts.



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.