|There are currently, 88 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
CERN Declares War On The Standard Model|
Posted on Saturday, April 22, 2017 @ 20:42:46 EDT by vlad
by Matt Williams (UniverseToday.com): Ever since the discovery of the Higgs Boson in 2012, the Large Hadron Collider has been dedicated to searching for the existence of physics that go beyond the Standard Model. To this end, the Large Hardon Collider beauty experiment (LHCb) was established in 1995, specifically for the purpose of exploring what happened after the Big Bang that allowed matter to survive and create the Universe as we know it.
Since that time, the LHCb has been doing some rather amazing things. Since that time, the LHCb has been doing some rather amazing things. This includes discovering five new particles, uncovering evidence of a new manifestation of matter-antimatter asymmetry, and (most recently) discovering unusual results when monitoring beta decay. These findings, which CERN announced in a recent press release, could be an indication of new physics that are not part of the Standard Model.
In this latest study, the LHCb collaboration team noted how the decay of B0
mesons resulted in the production of an excited kaon and a pair of
electrons or muons. Muons, for the record, are subatomic particles that
are 200 times more massive than electrons, but whose interactions are
believed to be the same as those of electrons (as far as the Standard
Model is concerned).
This is what is known as “lepton universality”, which not only
predicts that electrons and muons behave the same, but should be
produced with the same probability – with some constraints arising from
their differences in mass. However, in testing the decay of B0
mesons, the team found that the decay process produced muons with less
frequency. These results were collected during Run 1 of the LHC, which
ran from 2009 to 2013.
The results of these decay tests were presented on Tuesday, April 18th, at a CERN seminar,
where members of the LHCb collaboration team shared their latest
findings. As they indicated during the course of the seminar,
these findings are significant in that they appear to confirm results
obtained by the LHCb team during previous decay studies.
This is certainly exciting news, as it hints at the possibility that
new physics are being observed. With the confirmation of the Standard
Model (made possible with the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012),
investigating theories that go beyond this (i.e. Supersymmetry)
has been a major goal of the LHC. And with its upgrades completed in
2015, it has been one of the chief aims of Run 2 (which will last until
Full article: https://www.universetoday.com/135091/cern-declares-war-standard-model/#
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register|
|Re: CERN Declares War On The Standard Model (Score: 1)|
by vlad on Saturday, April 22, 2017 @ 21:02:19 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
|BTRAYMD comment (same source):The CERN data is legitimate but the interpretation of the data is subjective. That it is at odds with the “standard model” should surprise no one. It seems that virtually all recent data from NASA missions also contradicts the model. It seems that every publication revealing this data underscores surprise at the findings and a new “mystery” requiring the rethinking of the standard model.|
The obvious conclusion is that the standard model has very little predictive value, the cornerstone of any valuable theory.
This should not surprise anyone that looks closely at the model. It’s foundation consists of concepts that have never been confirmed despite billions of dollars and decades of research. The most notable of these unproven concepts are singularities, dark matter, dark energy, neutron stars and our sun being driven by nuclear fusion in it’s core. These concepts raise red flags for another important reason…..they require the abandonment of the known laws of physics and chemistry. As such, acceptance of these theories borders on religion and requires the abandonment of the scientific method.
It’s past time that astrophysicists and cosmologists take a step back and carefully inspect the lack of value in the current standard model. Far to much effort is required to continue to create mathematical salvages every time radio telescope data refutes the model. The bizarre and illogical concepts that arise from this mathematical masturbation are serving no purpose and have reduced cosmology to virtual science fiction. The time honored triad of the scientific of observation, hypothesis and experimental confirmation needs to be rigorously applied. Mathematics is not a subsitute for this process.
Current data needs to be correctly interpreted using the applicable bodies of scientific knowledge. It is becoming clear that a thorough knowledge of plasma physics and the principles of electrical engineering are critical for the correct interpretation of this data. Gravity and explosions cannot be exclusively used any longer. They just don’t work.
For example, the work of Anthony Peratt at Los Alamos National Labs can no longer be ignored or ridiculed. All recent data supports his models. And his work has been experimentally confirmed at numerous plasma physic labs across the country. He clearly demonstrated the formation of spiral galaxies using electric current, plasma and magnetic fields. His models also had the necessary velocities to maintain galactic structure. Dark matter, dark energy and black holes were not required. The recent measurement of the most powerful magnetic fields ever measured surrounding galaxies by NASA missions also supports his models.
The measurement of massive magnetic fields surrounding galactic centers (“black holes”) should also point to an electromagnetic explanation for these structures. Their emission of plasma jets, gamma and xray radiation as well as visible light should make it apparent that these bodies are electromagnetic in nature. The magnetic fields must exist with an accompanying electric current. This evidence points to the fact that these galactic centers (“black holes”) are in fact massive plasmoids.
Once the cosmologic community begins to address and accept this information, perhaps a more rational and understandable “standard model” can be developed.
The most clear failing of the standard model is it’s description of the
structure and function of our sun. The recent flood of data from NASA
missions (i.e Ibex) has devastated the standard model and validated the
“electric sun” model as published by Donald Scott.
Before detailing the recent support for an electric model it should be
first mentioned that there is absolutely no evidence that supports
nuclear fusion in the core as a source of the electromagnetic radiation
emitted by the sun. It is a mystery how hydrogen or helium would exist
in the core where only the heaviest elements should exist, not the
lightest gases known. But a core source of energy could not possibly
account for acceleration of charged particles as they approach
earth…this could only happen in an electric field. A surface temperature
of 5k with a coronal temp of 2 million also is inconsistent with the
core as a source. Finally, infrared data from penumbra show a dark
But the evidence supporting the electric model is stunning. The last
Ibex findings were published in the Astrophysics Journal Supplement, Oct
2015 in a series of 14 papers. One paper detailed a “massive river of
hydrogen” flowing into the sun from extragalactic sources. The electric
model both required and predicted this finding.
The surface of the sun is now confirmed to consist of plasma and massive
magnetic fields. So it seems logical to listen to plasma physicist and
electrical engineers to detail it’s structure and function. Donald Scott
is one of the most esteemed academic electrical engineers in the
He wrote the textbook used by most graduate programs in
electrical engineering in the U.S. He has recently published convincing
interpretations of the sun surface data which reveal that the sun
surface consists of Anode tufts. This was confirmed by the Safire
project, a plasma physics project directed by Dr. Michael Clarage. The
detail in which their findings are described is overwhelming and
irrefutable. Scott also provides clear understanding as to why “magnetic
reconnection” does not occur in natural systems.
Given the electric model for star formation, the sun’s surface of plasma
and magnetic fields is easily explained and perfectly predicted. Stars
form at areas of intense constriction by the magnetic fields along
Birkeland currents (Z PINCH). The exact structure of these Birkeland
currents was also just published by Scott and is being confirmed by the
newest NASA data.
Scott will eventually receive the Nobel for this work. Hopefully it will
not be posthumously like the Nobel Birkeland received 100 years after