ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 153 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Rossi Effect finally deciphered
Posted on Friday, September 07, 2018 @ 21:38:16 GMT by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: Several theorists believe to have found a theory which explains Rossi Effect,  including the own Andrea Rossi.
But no one among the several theories proposed is satisfactory, because all of them cannot explain the question ahead.

In order to put a positively charged particle inside an atomic nucleus, there is need to perforate a Coulomb barrier impossible to be perforated under conditions of low temperature and pressure.

For the supposal that cold fusion is able to occur under low conditions of pressure and temperature, there is need to consider that Coulomb repulsion is not so strong as it was considered up to now by nuclear theorists.


On another hand, to consider that cold fusion can be promoted by quantum tunneling is also impossible, because it introduces other puzzle:  if Coulomb barrier can be crossed by quantum tunneling at room conditions of low pressure and temperature, then, in the conditions of extremely high of temperature and pressure in the stars, cold fusion had to occur through a tax very higher than that occurring by hot fusion in the stellar nucleosynthesis. And therefore the hydrogen fuel of the stars would had to be had consumed billions years ago, and the Universe would be populated by cold giants.

So, any theory candidate to explain cold fusion must be able to conciliate the cold fusion occurrence in the laboratories with the hot fusion occurrence in the stars.  

In another words, there is need a theory able to respond the following question:  what differs cold fusion from hot fusion, and why cold fusion does not occur in the stars?

The answer for this question lies in the concept of electric field.
Along a century, the theorists never proposed a physical model of electric field, where the lines of force should be composed by the fundamental particles of the quantum vacuum.

No one undertook such a challenge, because scientists do not look for physical models, and the reason is because physical models composed by speculative particles of the quantum vacuum is a conjecture not allowed in the Scientific Method.

A physical model, whose line forces are composed by gravitons and electricitons, is proposed in the paper “Qn how Bohr model of hydrogen atom is connected to nuclear physics”:
https://fundamentaljournals.org/ijfps/article/view/ijfps.2018.330113/144

This model has some very interesting properties, as shown in that paper, and they are:


1- First property:
 The electric repulsion between two positively charged particles follows a new Coulomb law F= K.Q.q/(d^x), where x<2 when the distance between the two particles is shorter than 1000fm, and x<1 for distances shorter than 1,0fm.
Therefore, inside the atomic nuclei, the Coulomb repulsion is not so strong as the nuclear theorists believed.  And this means that there is no need the strong nuclear force, so that to keep protons and neutrons bound inside the atomic nuclei.

2- Second property:
The Coulomb repulsion depends on the velocity of the particles.

3- Third property:
The Coulomb repulsion also depends in the direction of the motion. 
For instance, in the U238 decay the alpha particle is leaving the nucleus, and the Coulomb repulsion with the newborn 234Th is weaker than the Coulomb repulsion when an alpha particle emitted by Po212 moves toward the nucleus U238, as happens in the Rutherford experiment.

This third property of the electric field is put in the form of equations, in the paper "Mathematical Confirmation for the Nuclear Properties K(O)= K(Ca)= 1/2K(Si)= 1/2K(Fe)":
https://www.scifedpublishers.com/open-access/mathematical-confirmation-for-the-nuclear-properties-ko-kcarnksi-kfe.pdf

And the calculation shows that Gamow quantum tunneling theory is not necessary for the explanation of a paradox:

After leaving U238, an alpha particle enters into a potential with 23MeV. But when the particle crosses the electrosphere, it leaves the newborn atom of 234Th with kinetic energy 4,2MeV.

Such behavior of the alpha particle can be compared with the following situation: a brick with 1kg falls down from a building with 23 meters, and it hits your head as if it was falling down from a height of 4,2 meter.

The equations of the electric field composed by gravitons and electricitons solves the puzzle, without the need of the unacceptable quantum tunneling theory proposed by Gamow.

But the electric field model has a fourth property:

4- Fourth property:
The electric field is not spherical as the physicists believed.  It has the shape of rings, as those rings of Saturn.  But due to random spin motion, in normal conditions it takes the shape of an apple (almost spherical).

The electric field with Saturn Rings shape is shown in the Figure 27 of the paper "Mathematical Confirmation for the Nuclear Properties K(O)= K(Ca)= 1/2K(Si)= 1/2K(Fe)".

The electric field with Saturn Ring shape is tested by equations in the paper.
From eq. (27) up to eq. (49), the calculation shows that the fusion between two protons (with this sort of electric field) reproduces the same quantity of proton-proton fusion as they occur, by second, in the Sun.

And quantum tunneling is not considered in the calculation.

Up to now the nuclear theorists are yet refusing to accept that Rossi Effect is real.  
But when Rossi’s company starts to sell his Ecat, the nuclear theorists will be obliged to swallow their proud, and will recognize that cold fusion really exists.  
Then they will need to look for a theory.  

And the only theory with chance to explain cold fusion is the present theory, in which the strong nuclear force does not play any rule in the aggregation protons and neutrons inside the atomic nuclei.


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 1
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Rossi Effect finally deciphered" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Rossi Effect finally deciphered (Score: 1)
by WGUGLINSKI on Saturday, September 08, 2018 @ 05:21:56 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message)
From: Wladimir guglinski
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2018 1:35 AM
To: pramodr@umich.edu
Cc: linxzhu@umich.edu; mrohith@umich.edu; dakotaht@umich.edu
Subject: Hundred-fold enhancement in far-field radiative heat transfer over the blackbody limit
 
To: Prof. Pramod Reddy
Linxiao Zhu
Rohith Mittapally
Dakotah Thompson
University of Michigan


I would like to comment your discovery published in Nature:


The way heat radiation is emitted must be connected with the structure of the electric fields of elementary particles, as the proton and electron.
But there is not any physical model of electric field proposed in Physics.

A physical model of electric field, composed by line forces of gravitons and electricitons, is proposed in the paper "On how Bohr model of hydrogen atom is connected to nuclear physics", as seen in the Figures 1 and 2:


From this model of electric fields, a conclusion is inferred:  the Coulomb law F= K.Qq/d² does not work in nanoscales.  For distances shorter than 1000fm, the law of electric interaction between two electric fields is F= K.Qq/(d^x), where x<2.

The equations that rule the interaction between the electric field of two particles, in distances between 1,0fm and 100fm, are proposed in the page 14 of the paper "Mathematical confirmation for the nuclear properties K(O)= K(Ca)= 1/2K(Si)= 1/2K(Fe)":
The equations, from eq. (17) up to eq. (26), also show that the Coulomb repulsion between two particles depends on the velocity of the particles, and also on the way as they move (if in contrary directions, or if one of them is leaving the other, as occurs when alpha particles leaves the nucleus U238 in the alpha decay).

I think this physical model of electric field can be the way for the explanation on why nonoscale objects can emit and absorb heat with far greater efficiency than current theories can explain.

Regards
Wladimir Guglinski



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.