Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 44 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science



Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

Close to Star Trek
Posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2021 @ 12:30:31 GMT by vlad

Science WGUGLINSKI writes: Warp drive pioneer and former NASA warp drive specialist Dr. Harold G “Sonny” White has reported the successful manifestation of an actual, real-world “Warp Bubble.” And, according to White, this first of its kind breakthrough by his Limitless Space Institute (LSI) team sets a new starting point for those trying to manufacture a full-sized, warp-capable spacecraft.

“To be clear, our finding is not a warp bubble analog, it is a real, albeit humble and tiny, warp bubble,” White told The Debrief, quickly dispensing with the notion that this is anything other than the creation of an actual, real-world warp bubble. “Hence the significance.”

“While conducting analysis related to a DARPA-funded project to evaluate possible structure of the energy density present in a Casimir cavity as predicted by the dynamic vacuum model,” reads the actual findings published in the peer-reviewed European Physical Journal, “a micro/nano-scale structure has been discovered that predicts negative energy density distribution that closely matches requirements for the Alcubierre metric.”




Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad

Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

"Close to Star Trek" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

What is wrong with the time in physics? (Score: 1)
by vlad on Sunday, December 12, 2021 @ 19:09:11 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Submitted by WGUGLINSKI: What is wrong with the time in physics?

Up to the 19 Century, the physicists believed that the space is filled by a medium they named “the luminiferous aether”, which meant that light was a wave moving in that medium, like waves of water move in the surface of a lake.

According to that concept of light, as a wave moving in a luminiferous aether, if one measures the speed of light in two contrary directions, one toward the Earth motion, and the other against the motion of the planet, the experiment has to achieve two different values of the light speed.

In 1887 Michelson and Morely made an experiment for detecting that influence of the Earth in the light speed, which, if detected, would be the scientific confirmation of the existence of the luminiferous aether.

The experiment did not detect any difference in the speed of light, and in order to solve the paradox Einstein proposed that, beyond the space be empty, the mathematics led him to conclude that time and space are a unique physical entity, the “space-time”.

So, after Einstein the concept of time and space have changed in physics. After that, timing became everything in physics.

Such a belief about what is time remains up to the present days, as we see for example in the article “DARPA Funded Researchers Accidentally Create the World’s First Warp Bubble”, of The Debrief portal, where Christopher Plain writes:



Warp drive, or a drive enabling space warp, is one of several ways of travelling through space found in science fiction.

Then let us analyze this way from which our understanding of what is “time” was developed thanks to Einstein.


The matter in the universe is every time changing. The water runs in the rivers going to the sea, and never goes back in contrary direction to the source. Birds hatch from eggs, and never return there. People and animals grow up, and never go back to the way they were when they were born. This evolution give us the intuition that matter has three states: past, present, and future.


The concept of time was introduced in physics with the aim to quantify the status of the matter. For instance, Galileo made several experiments, in which there is connection between space and velocity through the concept of time. Therefore, time is a parameter to measure the evolution of changes in matter, whether in the position that a body occupies in space, or to measure how an atom reacts with another to form a molecule. And before Einstein space and time were two independent parameters. Space and time were, each one, absolute independent entities. The only connection between them was through the velocity of the changes in matter.


In my book Subtle is the Math is shown that the structure of space of the universe was conceived in a way that in the behavior of such space four constants play a fundamental role: the imaginary number “i”, the neperian e= 2,718… , the fine structure constant 1/137, and the number pi= 3,1416… . If the space was conceived without the partnership of those four constants in the structure of the space, the universe would not exist, because the hydrogen atom would not be stable.

This partnership between the four constants promotes for the space some “magic” properties, being the word “magic” used here in the sense that the physicists interpret the space as a mysterious medium that escapes human comprehension. And the physicists interpret it as a magic because, as they use the math without to know some properties of the space, it seems that space violates the laws that they suppose to rule the working of the universe.


According to Einstein, if a current spaceship leaves the Earth and travels with velocity close to the speed of light, the time inside the spaceship runs slowly than in the Earth. Experiments by using atoms already have confirmed it.

However, it is not the time that runs slowly. The time does not exist. As said, the time is a parameter for the establishment of the connection between space and the changes of matter. Suppose you are at rest regarding the space (aether) of the universe. Then, if you start to move slowly, the interaction between your body and the aether is very low, and this does not affect the way the time runs. That is, regarding your body moving slowly with speed V in the aether, the time is the same for another body at rest in the aether. The time does not change.

 But if you start to move with a speed close to the light speed, the interaction between your body and the space reverberates strongly in the way the time runs. So, whereas in the clock that you are using to measure the time you see that only five minutes have passed, for a person at rest in the aether his clock will show that five years have passed.

However,  inside a spaceship with warp drive technology the time does not runs like in the current spaceships, because in the case of the space warp it is weak the interaction between the things inside the spaceship and the aether. In another words, the space warp technology prevents the interaction of the spaceship and the aether, and this is the reason it can move with speed faster than light.

Hawking interpreted it as time voyage, through a wormhole. But there is not any time voyage, as there is not any wormhole. It is only a technology that avoids the interaction between a spaceship and the aether.


All this mystery around the mysterious space was born from the wrong Einstein’s interpretation of the Michelon-Morley experiments. In my book Quantum Ring Theory was proposed two properties of the light, both illustrated in the figure 1:

1-   Property 1- light moves with Zitterbewegung (helical trajectory).

2-   Property 2- the flux of the aether crossing inside the helical trajectory is always constant.

So,  when the light coming from the air enters inside the water, as the flux of aether remains constant, then the radius of the helical trajectory diminishes with the light enters in the water (because the speed of the light inside water also diminished).

Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem

From this property of the light it is possible to explain the Michelon-Morley experiment without to introduce the paradoxes introduced through Einstein’s theory.  Indeed, being constant the flux of aether inside the helical trajectory of the light in the Michelon-Morley experiment, any contribution of the velocity of the Earth is absorbed by the change of the radius of the helical trajectory, working together with the change of the velocity of the light.


The space has yet may mysteries, unknown by the community of physicists.

In the paper “Calculation of proton charges from the electric charges of the fermions of the quantum vacuum”, published by Physics Essays (also published in the book Subtle is the Math), it is calculated the electric charge of the fermions that compose the aether (together with gravitons, magnetons, etc). The value achieved is 5.06532 × 10^−45 C.  From this value is calculated the proton charge, achieving the value 1.6026 × 10^−19 C, which is very close to the experimental e = 1.60218 × 10^−19 C.

This successful result is not a mere coincidence. The procedure of calculation is clear, and there are not any ad hoc assumptions.

But this success also implies in a paradox: by considering the model of electric field of the proton proposed in the paper, and by considering the current laws of physics applied to the space, a paradox is introduced by the successful calculation of the proton charge: its electric charge would have to be infinite.

Nevertheless, between the space and the electric fields there is a property yet unknown in physics, as illustrated in the Figure 2.

Não foi fornecido texto alternativo para esta imagem

The electric charges of the fermions of the proton electric field actuate only in a region delimited by the Bohr’s radius. If you put an electron in a point whose distance to the proton is larger than Bohr’s radius, as shown in the Figure 2, the fermions of the proton field do not interact with the fermions of the electron field in the yellow area. The fermions of the proton field interact with the fermions of the electron field only when the fermions of the proton field enter in the region limited by the Bohr’s radius in the electron field.

In resume, it is yet very poor our knowledge about the mysteries of the space. And this is the reason why what works in physics sometimes defys logic because some of the currents principles of physics are wrong. This is the reason why sometimes some researchers arrive to absurd conclusions, as Feynman when he concluded that the electron sometimes is able to go back in the time.


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.