ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 34 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.

Panacea-BOCAF

QVac_Eng

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

What is the Best Evidence for Over-Unity?
Posted on Friday, December 31, 2021 @ 19:06:45 GMT by vlad

Testimonials
Interesting Q/A from the e-catworld.com site [Posted on December 28, 2021]: << I received a suggestion and a request from an ECW reader for a thread to discuss the question of what is the best evidence that over-unity energy production is real.

“Is there acceptable proof for this? Could readers of your site put up the best evidence of over-unity of any kind, accepting that so far they may only be proofs of an effect that cannot be maintained or commercialized at present.

It would be good for us all to see the best experiments that confirm there is something that is a positive reality to keep our spirits high.”

I think it is a good question to discuss, and I will be interested in responses, if any. Thanks!>>



Here are some extracts from the Comments (start with funny;-):

Christopher Calder • Honestly, I think the best evidence is in all of those saucer shaped vehicles flying around the world every day of the year. Bob Lazar thinks they are powered by anti-matter, but I do not buy that belief because an anti-matter reaction is far too hot and explosive to contain and easily use. I suspect that the alleged stable form of element 115 that our US military possesses is so dense that it somehow punctures the etheric soup that space is filled with, allowing us to siphon off energy. That is why flying saucers never run out of fuel. They do not have any. The conical or pyramidal shaped reactor cores made of element 115 suck in stable and highly usable energy from the environment which generates electricity that is fed into anti-gravity generators. That is why when you park a flying saucer, you do not have to turn the engine off. You can keep it hovering a foot above the ground forever, and you never run out of gas. because there isn't any. That is where the ETs get the energy to build incredible underground cave homes on Mars, on the Moon, and in various locations on Earth, from Antarctica to Alaska. I am not kidding about all of this, and that is why NASA recently hired a bunch of priests and alleged holly men to figure out a way to admit the truth about ETs to the general public without having people go nuts.
     Reply/ Steve D --> Christopher Calder • "Figure out a way to admit the truth about ETs to the general public without having people go nuts." Just like they did in the 1938 radio broadcast "The war of the worlds"?
    Just a technical point, if a flying saucer hovers 1 foot above a parking spot is that strictly parking, I mean should ET feed the parking meter?
          Reply/ HAL9000 --> Steve D • Forget the parking violation; the driver should be arrested for operating an unregistered, uninsured, and unlicensed vehicle. Earth is hard.

Raymond Hellberg --> Gerard McEk • Your logic is correct - if a device seems to "create" energy, the energy must be harvested from somewhere and moved and/or converted to a different, useful form. It just cannot come from nothing, but I'm not saying that energy theoretically could not come from an unknown source, as "vaccum"/black matter or other, until now unseen/unknown, forms. And if the SKLep really does that, then Hallelujah!.

But really, guys - the phrase "..if it is officially proven to work." is in my head what one REALLY should be focusing on instead of all "heat inducing" speculations. There is still no proof. The papers showing the measurements from G. Levi contains only the phrase "seems to..." and does not *conclude* anything than stating what is connected where and what the instruments show. And the measurements taken are complete useless in the eyes of those having some basic education and experience in measuring techniques. A few questions I ask myself is:
- Why no proof?
- Why exclude ALL the performance data from the certification?
- Why did/could AR, being a brilliant scientist, lie/misunderstand the performance of the SKLED, planned to be produced in millions?
- Why exclude Mats Lewan because he just was telling the truth?
I'm not worried of the performance of AR's devices, there I have made my own conclusions, but I'm worried so many are being mislead IF the SKLep also should turn out to be "a misunderstanding of numbers".

Axil Axil • See: https://youtu.be/kfffy12uQ7g /The Misunderstood Nature of Entropy

In order to extract energy from the vacuum, a voluum of the vacuum must contain more energy than the surrounding environment. To create over unity energy production from the vacuum, a mechanism is required to inject energy into a voluum of the vacuum.

The mechanism that produces energy from the vacuum is vacuum decay. Vacuum decay converts the vacuum into energy. If we can produce a false vacuum, that false vacuum will convert a concurrent overlayed voluum of the true vacuum into energy.

The EVO is a metastable false vacuum that is capable of generating increased energy from the vacuum. The EVO is unstable, but until it distroys itself due to its instability, it cannot interact with the vacuum. The EVO is outside of any influence that exists in our universe. When the EVO distroys itself, it will render both its own energy content and a like amount of vacuum energy that it reside in into pure energy.

In the following video at 9:00 there is a description of the EVO as a string theory condition defined by Ed Witten and Ashoke Sen which earned each of them $3million in physics prize money not to long ago.

The EVO is a vacuum decay bubble that will transform a micron sized volume of the vacuum into energy. We see this process in our Vega experiment and this is the mechanism that Rossi describes in his theory paper.

This 2 times the energy content of the exploding EVO is where the "Reaction" energy comes from.

Vacuum decay is a new process discovered in the last decade that creates energy from the vacuum. Here is an explanation of how the false vacuum produces energy from the vacuum.

[... and please, comment below, if you have other pertinent answers to the main question. Thanks. Vlad]


Note: Since it is already 2022 for many of you, I wish that the New Year brings to all of us what we cannot buy with money: health, love, happiness, friends and peace...and of course, the miracle of ubiquitous, clean and abundant energy, so we can finally tackle the global warming threat once and for all!

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Testimonials
· News by vlad


Most read story about Testimonials:
Dr. Eugene Mallove is dead


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"What is the Best Evidence for Over-Unity?" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.