All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero
Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale
Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy,
Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy,
Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy,
Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell,
Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics,
Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex
Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics,
Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects
Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the . PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the .
|
There has always been a "Lorentz Aether Theory Party" whose members believe that Einstein's theories can be made right, simply by bringing back the aether. This can indeed be done, but only providing the aether in question corresponds in all important details to the sea of molecular vortices proposed by James Clerk Maxwell in 1861. Lorentz himself never proposed any physical structure for the aether that he had in mind. Ironically, he rejected Stokes' entrainment model on the grounds that it would cause vortices at the interface. Yet Lorentz seems to have ignored the fact that Maxwell's aether placed vortices at the centre of the electromagnetic wave propagation mechanism. 
