ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 239 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Alternative form of power
Posted on Sunday, August 10, 2003 @ 23:05:36 UTC by vlad

Science From Sweet-VTA yahoo group:
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 12:00:37 +0200
From: "KJ van Vlaenderen", Subject: Re: Add up the ideas

...It is off topic, but please see the Bedini notes about charging batteries. If I am not mistaken, the back EMF pulses should recharge the battery. The recharge voltage should be very much pulsed. I don't know if Bedini collects the back EMF energy first in a high-capacity capacitor, and then periodically discharges the capacitor in a second battery.


John Bedini also used the word 'scalar' and 'scalar field energy'. I defined this scalar field as:

S = - 1/c^2 dV/dt - div(A) .

Then focussing on dV/dt (the time derivative of Voltage) and considering the EXTENDED electric power equation


P = d(QV)/dt = dQ/dt V + Q dV/dt = IV + Q dV/dt


(Q is charge in an electrical potential V, which is potential energy W=QV)

then it might be that Bedini and others use the power law P = Q dV/dt in stead of P = IV, which is the well known electric power law. This alternative form of power is a scalar field effect. I am totally amazed about the coherence in Bedini's teachings with the power law P = Q dV/dt that is NOT described in any text book or even in the scientific press. My scientific paper on this subject has been accepted to be published in scientific press, recently.

Intuitively people think that magnets are an inexhaustable form of energy, but the official teachings say: a magnetic field is conservative, therefore it is not possible to extract energy from this field. If you can prove that magnetic fields can be non-conservative, then you have a point.

My hint is: combine these back EMF pulses (with high dV/dt) with a large charge reservoir (large Q). Bedini uses very big electric capacitors, and the secondary battery is also a large charge reservoir. Pulsed power technology will never be the same, if it is used as a power source. I am convinced this is possible.

Anyone with high school math knowledge should be able to understand my extended power law.

Sorry for this off topic message.

Koen


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Alternative form of power" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Add up the ideas (Score: 1)
by vlad on Sunday, August 10, 2003 @ 23:22:36 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Another interesting message from Koen (Sweet-VTA):

John, now that you mentioned Bearden en Einstein. Bearden might be right about his gravity model: a bi-directional wave structure of standing scalar field waves. His problem is that he did not give an exact definition of Scalar field, and he constantly confuses different notions, such as fields, potentials, and superpotentials. His cooperation with Evans has distracted him from his original thought direction, which was much better.

When I combine "my" longitudinal electro-scalar wave (LES wave) with Bearden's idea of making standing (bi-directional) waves, then INDEED the electric components of the two oppositely moving waves cancel each other, while the amplitudes of the two scalar waves in opposite direction add up. The result, a standing scalar wave, is (according to my definitions) equivalent to a dynamical electrical vacuum polarization. At some points in the standing wave (the nodes) there is no vacuum polarization, and at other points there is a strong d(S)/dt , and this is equivalent to a vacuum charge polarization, since d(S)/dt is proportional to charge density. See my extended Gauss law.

Harold Puthoff has published papers about vacuum polarization being equivalent to gravity. A vacuum polarization gives rise to a change of vacuum epsilon0 and mu0, such that a light wave is bend in vacuum, according to the principle of refraction. So this raises the question: what is responsible for a vacuum polarization? Large massive objects might send/receive longitudinal electro-scalar waves, and between two objects, a coherent field appears of bidirectional longitudinal electro-scalar waves. This means that the large objects tune each other, to lock LES wave phases, probably according to some principle of minimizing energy (the electric fields disappear). This is similar to the Casimir force effect, where particular wave modes between two plates are absent. Critics commented that the Casimir force is way to small to explain gravity. But what if these wave are the much more energetic LES waves?

In principle, "my" LES waves can be much faster than c (lightspeed). It depends on an unknown factor, lambda, which can represent (exactly like epsilon and mu) a new type of scalar field polarization in material macroscopic media. Tesla alredy mentioned that his observed longitudinal electric waves can be faster than c. The physics community did not believe him, because of their numerous hidden and unproven assumptions. This means: exit Einstein and others, exit Lorentz transform, exit many other related physics paradigms, such as quantum mechanics. Did I forget to mention quantum mechanics? Exit quantum mechanics. Exit Higgs field as symmetry breaking mechanism, since the S field is a vacuum symmetry breaking field on a much more essential level of symmetry.

Tesla mentioned also that these longitudinal electric field waves were much more energetic than the Hertz wave, which means that much smaller receivers can be used as electrical powersource, in case it receives the 'Tesla' wave. The VTA surface is not large enough to explain the OU factor by means of infrared radiation assimilation, or by means of assimilation of the visible (more energetic than infrared) light. So, plenty of reasons to believe the VTA had something to do with LES waves. Extrapolating Sweet´s own story about conditioning a motional electric field
....

Sorry for this long story, but several ideas from several people begin to add up:
- Tesla´s energetic longitudinal electric wave
- Bearden´s standing bi-wave structure of scalar fields, which is a gravity model
- Puthoff´s vacuum polarization gravity model

Koen



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.