ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 255 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Interesting thought
Posted on Friday, August 15, 2003 @ 01:15:42 UTC by vlad

Science "...However, it does pay to keep an open mind on this subject for the ramifications are great. For example, Dr. Puthoff theorized that the nature of the vacuum energy is highly randomized electromagnetic energy, and the source is the motion of all the charge carriers in the universe.

If this is true, then the next step in the train of hypotheses becomes very interesting. What if we consider the vacuum energy to be a conduit, rather than a source, to this motion of matter in the universe? - we just convert whatever non-random or directed motion of these charge carriers into useful work which will ultimately end up (or dissipate) as a more random motion of matter. The First Law is not violated since energy of the Universe is conserved (you have to draw your thermodynamic boundaries correctly), and the Second Law is not violated since the energy extraction and dissipation resulted in an increase in the entropy of the Universe. One could half-jokingly say that the kinetic energy of earth's orbit was very slightly reduced! As long as there is non- random motion of mass in the Universe, there is the potential for us to use this "energy source" - I suggest the vacuum energy may be the the conduit to do this.

A lot of hypotheses and theories strung together, but sort of fun to speculate about it all - the ramifications of being able to "tap" the vacuum energy are so enormous that we should explore every avenue to see if it is possible.

Jon "Free Energy 'R Us" Noring"

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 4.5
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Interesting thought" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Interesting thought (Score: 1)
by ElectroDynaCat on Friday, August 15, 2003 @ 12:29:02 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Even beyond the prospect of Free Energy, the whole vacuum flux concept should do something more striking, it should force us to think about the whole construct of reality. Do the Laws of Physics really exist as a functional utility? Or are the laws of Physics a lower expression of a higher Law? Think about Mathematics, does the number 3 really exist? Can I go out to the supermarket, push my cart over to the Fresh Number section and pick up a few ounces of the number 3? No! Its totally imaginary. I can remember my instructor in complex variables talking about imaginary numbers and saying that the square root of a negative number is just as unreal as an integer. Its the same with Physics , a set of accounting rules that we have used to keep some order in our knowledge, and we keep those rules until they lose their usefullness.



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.