Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 120 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		Is H.E. Puthoff deliberately misleading others in the field of ZPE? Posted on Saturday, September 06, 2003 @ 22:44:15 UTC by vlad Robert A. Patterson writes: Let me start by stating that I am pro-free-energy and somewhat biased when it comes to the work of H.E. Puthoff i.e. having conducted my own research vs. relying on others to devise a method of tapping the vacuum for its residual energy densities, that said: There are 3.2 MeV.'s of recoverable energy in Fusion Conversely there are 200 MeV.'s of recoverable energy in Fission H. E. Puthoff is working with resanent cavities, offtimes referred to as open vacuum cavities which may be optically pumped, thereby inductively coupling atoms into the cavity system. Cavity atoms experience significant squeezing under the influence of strong driving fields. These squeezing effects are intrinsically connected to the polarization of dressed state populations by tuning the cavity appropriately close to the atomic transition frequency we may induce a "non-vanishing inversion" of the dressed-state's setting the standard for optimal conditions for atomic squeezing. In the case of an isolated two-level atom, the most important damping mechanism is a spontaneous radiative decay. This mechanism is associated with the "coupling of the atom" to the "zero point electromagnetic fields". Empty-cavity transmission resonances are found to "split" in the presence of the 'atoms', and under these conditions, the cavities temporal responses are found to be "oscillatory". These effects may be viewed as a manifestation of a vacuum-field Rabi splitting or as a simple consequence of the linear absorption and dispersion of the intercavity atoms. Note the term "split" is synonymous with "Fission" which may occur in properly tuned Atom-Coupled Optical Waveguide Systems. Is H.E. Puthoff deliberately misleading others in the field of ZPE? Wouldn't you? Robert A. Patterson Reverse Engineering Specialist Gravitics Among The Ancients http://ancientgravitics.tripod.com/   Login Nickname Password Security Code: Type Security Code Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. Related Links · More about Science · News by vlad Most read story about Science: 100 miles on 4 ounces of water? Article Rating Average Score: 2 Votes: 2 Please take a second and vote for this article: Options   Printer Friendly "Is H.E. Puthoff deliberately misleading others in the field of ZPE?" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments | Search Discussion The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Is H.E. Puthoff deliberately misleading others in the field of ZPE? (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Monday, September 08, 2003 @ 11:50:36 UTC Boy do I feel completely stupid... I visit this site to see if there are any exciting developments (particularly with Greer as well as GWE). But then I read stuff like this, and I just go crosseyed, and my nose starts bleeding. Now, Im not an engineer, nor do I have much knowledge in any of this stuff. I don't believe anything I read, but I do accept the possibility that it may be truthful - and hopefully proven a reality someday. Having said that, I didn't understand a thing you said (no offense). It's due to my own lack of understanding. However, I'm not sure many people DO know what you (or anyone else) is saying - hence, the problem with this field of study. There's too many terms just thrown around - most of which seem to be "created" by the people writing the articles or designing the machines. I think a lot of people are referring to the same things - but they just don't know it. Anyway - In what way is Puthoff misleading others in ZPE, and why would he? -Ryan The kind of News expected here by vlad on Tuesday, September 09, 2003 @ 01:07:57 UTC Re: Is H.E. Puthoff deliberately misleading others in the field of ZPE? (Score: 1) by ElectroDynaCat on Wednesday, September 10, 2003 @ 16:25:08 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Puthoff's work on the ground states of hydrogen and the zero point flux is as of this date probably one of the few honest and fundamental findings in the field. This field of research is only going to advance when experiments of this type are carried out and not the work of other fudgers and hucksters. Puthoff's apparatus and experimental protocols are valid. His conclusion is tempting, not a yes or a no, but the one other outcome that almost guarantees that he is on to something: inconclusive. I would repeat the experiment again, only on the next try, avoid using an aluminum cavity. Instead I would use a superconducting cavity that has not been exposed to the atmosphere.

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.