ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 119 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Plasma physics
Posted on Sunday, September 14, 2003 @ 23:38:14 UTC by vlad

Science This post from BlazeLabs yahoo group might be of interest to some of our readers:
Hello all,

Thanks Saviour for this very nice article introducing Debye Length and Plasma frequency. As a former student in plasma physics It is normal that I know Debye and Langmuir work which where for me a good starting point to understand some aspects of corona glows.


But although corona glow physic is closely related to plasma physics, Debye length and plasma frequency cannot be directly applied to the case of Lifters.

For those among you that didn't read the paper, let me resume the situation :

1 - A plasma, like conductors and insulators, has a tendency to be electrically neutral (E = 0)
2 - When a charge (microscopic or macroscopic) is introduce in a plasma the electric field created by the charge is neutralised by a screen of charges on a distance that is called Debye length.
3 - The Debye length depends on the plasma density (density of charges). The greater the density the smaller the length.
4 - (not in the article) When an area outside from electrical equilibrium exist (then necessarily smaller than the Debye length) this area is expelled by electrostatic forces to the external boundaries of the plasma.
5 - (not in the article) This external area far from electric equilibrium (E not null) is called the shield and was studied in details by Langmuir in low pressure luminescent glows.

This general statements applies to a great number of situations. In a conductor for instance the charges (when existing) are concentrated on a very thin layer (you can now calculated the length of the layer) on the surface of the conductor in such a way that the field is null inside.

In the corona glow the monopolar area outside from the luminescent glow where the mechanical effect (electric wind) appears is then also a kind of shield. In the corona glow however, the shield nearly fills the whole gap whereas in usual plasma the shield is a very small space compared to the size of the plasma (very well stated in the examples given in the articles).

It is then clear that : the Debye length formula do not apply sraitforward to the corona case.

The reason is simple the Debye formula was obtained in a case where the plasma is fully ionised in thermal equilibrium. This is not directly said in the article but can be guessed : charge dynamics is obtained by Newton second principal F = ma ( then no collision between ion and neutrals) and only one temperature T is taken into account (instead of three Te, Ti, Tn in the general case). Corona glows are low ionisation plasma (ions density a lot smaller than neutral density) far from thermal equilibrium (electron at high temperature, ion temperature very close from the neutral one). The physics of the luminescent glow in corona discharge is a lot more complex than the physics of tokomaks (which is the main background of all the plasma studies of the last thirty years) and then many aspect of the glow are still not clearly understood (such as streamers formation).On the other side the monopolar region where no ionisation process occurs and only one polarity is present is a lot simple. The main process there is only migration of ions through neutrals (v = kE).

It is possible however to derive simple formulas in the monopolaire drifting region following the Debye main idea (it is the reason why I have introduce his concept in the group). Because in our case charge is associated with drift and then with current the maximum density is related to a maximum current, the derivation is fully explained in my pages:

http://membres.lycos.fr/plasmapropulsion/the_lifters_dedicated_page.htm

Although the Debye formula cannot be applied to corona glows, the general conclusions as explained above are still valid, and among them : "the bigger the gap the smaller the charge density".

But there is also a very important specific result:

The bigger the gap the smaller the current, in order that the maximum rise of pressure is constant (do not depends on size).

Henri.

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Plasma physics" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.