ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 120 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Longitudinal waves (experiment continued)
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2003 @ 15:23:48 UTC by vlad

Science Intuitively I find this topic very important; from Swet-VTA yahoo group:
Koen van Vlaenderen writes: Dear mr. Wicaksono,

Could you describe the difference between series and anti-series? Since a bifilar (bucking) coil is symmetrical I do not know the difference. If the coil is really a bucking coil, then you can automatically exclude magnetic field coupling. If indeed the sum of the two bucking coils in-series do no add up, then a pure electric-capacitive coupling is not likely. Fascinating! I think you struck oil…

Another example of scalar field effect is Avramenko´s Single Wire electric power transmission.
See http://www.rexresearch.com/avramenk/avramenk.htm
The electric wave through this single wire can only be longitudinal.
In order to explain the extraordinary high energy transport through the single wire
(with almost no losses) one cannot avoid a scalar field, such that the
electric wave actually is a longitudinal electro-scalar wave.

Avramenko does not have a clear model of the wave that is guided by
the single-wire transmission line.
This wave is a wired Tesla wave, and we can only wonder how much energy
is present anywhere in the form of wireless Tesla wave radiation.

Do the stars and sun emit just TEM waves?
According to Tesla the longitudinal polarized waves are much more powerful,
therefore a much smaller receiver surface will be sufficient for converting
many watts of Tesla wave energy into usable energy.

Research to such waves waves can be divided into the following topics:
- wired Tesla waves (longitudinal electro-scalar waves), such as the Avramenko system
- wireless Tesla wave systems (tuned sender receiver systems)
- measurements and efficient absorption of the natural Tesla waves

Power conversion should be according to Q dV/dt and not according to
dQ/dt V = IV (Q is charge, V is voltage).
dV/dt should be created by charge compression-expansion (charge density fluctuations)
rather than charge flow dQ/dt.
A charge compression/expansion is internally organised by convergent or divergent currents,
and this is an open system. Maxwell+Lorentz theory only describes closed loop systems.
Since the gauge conditions (Lorentz or Coulomb gauge condition) are
unscientific, a more general electrodynamics theory exists that also
describes these open systems.

Koen

----- Original Message -----
From: Wicaksono S.

Dear Mr. Vlaenderen,

I have checked the possibility of magnetic and electric field coupling that might interfere the experiment. I use 2 same length bifilar coils wound on an air-cored solenoid. If there is any electric field coupling then if the 2 bifilar coils are connected in series there will be no output voltage difference compared to one independent coil. This is also true for anti-series connection. If there is any magnetic field coupling then if the 2 bifilar coils are connected in series there will be 2 times bigger output voltage, and if the coils are connected in anti-series there will be no output voltage. The result of experiment is:

1. If the 2 coils are not connected, they have the same output voltage.

2. If they are connected, whether in series or anti-series connection, the output voltage will be diminished. Obiviously this is not electrical field coupling, nor magnetic field coupling. I never seen something like this before, where 2 voltage source always cancel each other whether in series or anti series connection.

Wicaksono
------------------
Reply to Koen, From: "Wicaksono S."

Uh, I think I have a "bad english" words here. What I mean about series connection is like when two output coils from a transformer which have V voltage in each of them connected serially so the result is 2V volts. The anti-series connection is when the connection misplaced so the result is 0 volt. The coils schematic diagram looks like this :

coil1 _
| | | |
) ) ) )
) ) ) )
) ) ) )
) ) ) )
) ) ) )
) ) ) )
|_| | |
coil2

There is something else about the experiment. I found that the field is not distributed uniformly at all area, but it is maximum in area of current peaks and voltage peaks of transmitter (tesla pancake coil). I hope this has any relationship with your words "charge density wave and current density wave are sources of scalar field".

Wicaksono



Note: Also see our previous post on this topic: LES

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Longitudinal waves (experiment continued)" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Scalar Electromagnetic Wave Theory (Score: 1)
by vlad on Sunday, September 28, 2003 @ 20:43:11 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Bill,

first some quotes from your previous posts:
> Scalar Electromagnetic Wave Theory combines both electromagnetic theory
> and scalar theory.
> My approach is to begin at the beginning - classical physics. Then, work my
> way up to electrodynamics. Starting at the top would only lead to complete
> confusion.


Again I ask you a few simple questions.
- how is this "scalar" defined????? Is it a field??? Is it a potential???
Or is it just a scalar factor without physical unit ??????????
- can you give us your "Scalar electromagnetic wave equation" ?????
- did you find new equations describing electrodynamics that includes a
scalar field ????

If you cannot answer my simple questions, then I won´t ask them again.
Then I won´t take you too seriously, until you CAN answer my simple
questions.
Your previous reply isn´t satisfying at all, it is patronising.
Don´t get me wrong, I am curious about your concepts,
but thus far I am the only one who DEFINED a classical vacuum scalar field
(including scalar waves) in an exact way,
and DEFINED its relation with the electromagnetic fields
by means of mathematical equations. I also described how my theory might
explain some results of past experiments.

Only by precise definitions can we verify or falsify a theory,
and can you expect to receive constructive critisism from others.
Your pictures show no relationship with dm/dt for instance,
or with a clearly defined scalar factor.
We can only guess what you mean, so this means nothing at all.

I don´t think you can show us a "Scalar electromagnetic wave theory".


Friendly regards,
Koen




----- Original Message -----
From: "William Alek"
To: "Koen van Vlaenderen"
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Scalar Electromagnetic Wave Theory


> Koen,
>
> According to my research thus far, the only time and place where
> electromagnetism and gravity couple is when the mass of a system is
> changing. Otherwise, when mass is constant or static, they decouple. So,
> further research in this area MUST be along the lines of a fluctuating
mass.
> For a constant mass system, the higher order potential doesn't do
anything.
> It only becomes active when a mass is fluctuating.
>
> To take a quote from one of your links below, "... According to Bohm, this
> significant incommensurability has to lead to discover an entirely new
order
> to physics at a fundamental level with all its implications for classical
> theory. ..."
>
> My approach is to begin at the beginning - classical physics. Then, work
my
> way up to electrodynamics. Starting at the top would only lead to complete
> confusion.
>
> According to my theory, you don't need an extra scalar field at all. One
is
> enough. Just fill in the missing half of physics with a fluctuating mass,
> and your their.
>
> I try to keep things simple and easy to understand.
>
> Bill
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Koen van Vlaenderen
> > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 2:41 AM
> > To: William Alek;
> > Subject: Re: Scalar Electromagnetic Wave Theory
> >
> >
> > Bill,
> >
> > Can you show us in mathematical detail how your theory extends classical
> > electrodynamics?
> > For instance, how do you define your scalar field?
> > Your suggestive pictures ask for it. Start with Maxwell's equations, for
> > instance,
> > and progress to your theory.
> > Then show how your scalar field terms appear in the electrodynamics
> > equations.
> >
> > Recently my paper about scalar field effects, such as
> > longitudinal electric
> > waves, has been accepted
> > to be published in http://www.rintonpress.com/books/chuby.html .
> > You can find it at http://home.wanadoo.nl/raccoon/scalarfield3.pdf .
> > Wesley and Monstein have used a few formulae from my previous
> > publiced paper
> > with André Waser as co-author.
> >
> >
> > Thus far you didn´t show anything mathematical in relation to the
Maxwell
> > theory,
> > and your hints cannot be called a theory at all.
> > I already commented in a positive way to your idea of parametric
> > resonance,
> > (but not as a mass fluctuation, for which there is no indicication such
an
> > effect
> > exists in combination with standard electrodynamical circuits)
> > and I was able to "apply" my theory of scalar field effects with
> > respect to
> > your idea,
> > see attachement.
> >
> > Hopefully I receive comments from you about this.
> >
> > Just one practicle example that shows the need for a generalised
> > electrodynamics theory:
> > the electrical energy transport through single wire transmission lines
> > (Avramenko experiment).
> > Such a transmission line carries longitudinal electric waves, in stead
of
> > the transversal
> > electric waves in paired (grounded) transmission lines. The energy flow
in
> > the single wire transmission line
> > cannot be expressed by the usual Umov-Poynting vector.
> > I showed the necessity of an extra scalar field S is necessary
> > in order to
> > express the energy flow
> > carried by longitudinal electric waves.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Koen van Vlaenderen
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William Alek"
> > To: "ZPEnergy" ...
> > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 4:26 AM
> > Subject: Scalar Electromagnetic Wave Theory
> >
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I displayed a "special" slide at the IW2003 conference last week which
> > > showed a summary of my new Scalar Electromagnetic Wave Theory:
> > > http://www.intalek.com/Papers/ScalarElectromagneticTheory.gif
> > >
> > > It details how this new Scalar Wave theory extends "classic"
> > electromagnetic
> > > wave theory.
> > >
> > > Spacetime media is mathematically abstracted as a scalar potential.
How
> > this
> > > media is operated upon determines whether longitudinal and/or
transverse
> > > effects are produced.
> > >
> > > It is well known in "classic" electromagnetic theory that motion of
> > electric
> > > dipoles launches transverse electromagnetic waves. These waves
propagate
> > at
> > > a fixed speed of c, which is determined by its wavelength times its
> > > frequency. The cause of this speed is actually determined by
> > the Newtonian
> > > "acceleration" of constant mass dipoles.
> > >
> > > Scalar waves are launched by fluctuating the mass of an object. The
> > > conversion of mass to energy and energy to mass produces longitudinal
> > > pressure waves of the spacetime media. These waves propagate at
infinite
> > > speed, or considered to travel "instantaneously". The motion of a
> > > fluctuating mass is non-Newtonian because its acceleration is
> > ALWAYS zero.
> > A
> > > change in its velocity is instantaneous, and therefore, inertialess.
> > >
> > > Scalar Electromagnetic Wave Theory combines both electromagnetic
theory
> > and
> > > scalar theory. When an electric dipole is fluctuating and oscillating,
> > > longitudinal and transvervse electromagnetic waves of the
> > spacetime media
> > > are launched. These waves can propagate at speeds between zero and
> > infinity.
> > > The actual speed of the wave and its intensity are determined
> > by how much
> > > the spacetime media is compressed or rarefied. Compressing the media
> > > increases the intensity of the E and B Fields. However,
> > rarefying the same
> > > media decreases their intensity.
> > >
> > > Both electromagnetic waves and scalar waves obey the inverse square
law.
> > >
> > > This diagram is also displayed here:
> > > http://intalek.com/Index/Index.htm
> > >
> > > Bill
> > > The NUCLEAR VILLAGE Project
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > William S. Alek
> > > INTALEK, INC. PHONE/FAX: 219.924.2742
> > > 3506-43rd. Place EMAIL:
> > > Highland, IN 46322-3129 USA HOME PAGE:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.