Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 144 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science


ECW E-Cat World


Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times



Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

"Over Unity" a misnomer for ZPE?
Posted on Wednesday, January 23, 2002 @ 05:12:00 GMT by vlad

General S. Michael Hoke writes: I'm inclined to believe we should avoid using the term "over unity" in describing ZPE devices, for two reasons. Firstly, a ZPE device is no more an "over unity" device than a windmill, and secondly, those of us advocating The Disclosure Project have already raised enough eyebrows with references to extraterrestrial visitation, reverse-engineering and the like without throwing a term like "over unity" into the mix.

Getting back to the windmill analogy - I trust you'll agree a wind generator is powered by ambient (wind) energy with an efficiency clearly less than unity. Energy input and output are readily measured and compared, so this is hardly controversial.
Just as the windmill is powered by ambient wind energy, the ZPE device is powered by ambient (in this case ZP) energy. The key difference here is that unlike the readily-measurable wind energy input, we're dealing with an ambient energy input which is far more difficult to quantify. Here we have a device which appears to be powered by nothing more than maybe a D cell battery (the remainder being ZP energy), and yet, as if by majic, we may get a few Kw out the other end. Hmmmmmm.
But let's not kid ourselves (or anyone else) about this being "over unity", as this would be a great disservice to what I sincerely believe to be the most promising new technology going. At this point I must confess to being a biologist (read "non-physicist"), so I hope you'll indulge me here. I submit the above in deference to others capable of doing math with their shoes on.



Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about General
· News by vlad

Most read story about General:
Z machine melts diamond to puddle

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

""Over Unity" a misnomer for ZPE?" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: "Over Unity" a misnomer for ZPE? (Score: 1)
by Anonymous on Thursday, January 24, 2002 @ 12:17:00 GMT
Michel Gauthier (michel.gauthier@ualberta.ca) writes: I agree that "Over Unity" is a misnomer. I feel that "Free Energy" also falls into this category. These terms do create a barrier when trying to convince people (particulary academics) of the reality of ZPE devices. The basic problem is the beleif that 'you can't get something for nothing'. This is true. However, what is not widely accepted is that the fabric of space-time is zero-point field energy. In fact, all the forces and structures in nature can be interpreted as manifestations of asymmetries in the zero-point field.

When this is realized then people will be able accept that this ambient energy can be "tuned into" and made to power electrical circuits, or channeled into other forms of electromagnetic energy (e.g. heat, light).

Unfortunately, ZPE theories and working ZPE devices are not widely known or accepted. Hopefully this will soon change.

Re: "Over Unity" a misnomer for ZPE? (Score: 1)
by Anonymous on Sunday, March 03, 2002 @ 19:49:00 GMT
Vlad (vlad@zpenergy.com) writes: Don't confuse COP with efficiency. Please see this recent letter from Tom Bearden's site: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/022502.htm


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.