Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 131 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		Example of suppression Posted on Thursday, October 30, 2003 @ 14:27:10 UTC by rob Watching the "Conspiracy Theories" show on Discovery Channel on 10/30/2003 was interesting because it had a piece on Cold Fusion. But boy was I dead wrong in which way I thought it would be interesting... The whole outcome of the piece was that Cold Fusion was a fraud. It simply doesn't work. The piece touched somewhat on the subject that those who were most critical had a deep affiliation with the Tokamak, and thus most eager to see Cold Fusion fail. But hey, it's "Conspiracy Theories" right ? They can't all be that evil, can they ?? There are probably hundreds (thousands?) of scientists conducting successful replications of "Cold Fusion" and Cold Fusion conference goers that would heartily disagree with the "common knowledge" that Cold Fusion is dead. See? This is a classic example of where an influentous media channel is governed (perhaps not knowingly) by the Scientific Community and thus effecting a kind of suppression. Do you subscribe to Discovery Channel ?? Stop it. /Rob   Login Nickname Password Security Code: Type Security Code Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. Related Links · More about General · News by rob Most read story about General: Z machine melts diamond to puddle Article Rating Average Score: 0 Votes: 0 Please take a second and vote for this article: Options   Printer Friendly "Example of suppression" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Example of suppression (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Friday, October 31, 2003 @ 10:12:02 UTC I was watching Rug Rats with my kids when they talked about a toy that was powered by a "cold fusion" system from Italy. I thought WOW is this a "soft" inftroduction for kids, like the UFO stuff that is all over the school and tv systems today? Any thoughts on how and why cold fusion gets put on a trashy kid show? Re: Example of suppression (Score: 1) by ElectroDynaCat on Friday, October 31, 2003 @ 10:57:45 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) The name is erroneous, its not fusion, and its not cold. There are two facts that tell us its not fusion, first, the experimenter(s) survive to tell the tale. A fusion reaction involving deuterium would produce neutrons in sufficient quantity to kill just about anyone in the vicinity. No matter how softly two deuterons fuse, a neutron with 14mev of energy comes blasting out from the reaction. This energy is enough to pass through the armor of a tank and kill the occupants inside (remember the neutron bomb? same principle). The second fact that should tell us its not fusion is that it works with plain old hydrogen. So whatever is happening, if anything is happening at all, is the "production of anomalous energy by an unknown mechanism". Doesn't sound bite as well as "cold fusion". Maybe we can invent a new word "POAEBAUM" to rename the process.

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.