 |
There are currently, 288 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
|  |
Patents awarded for usage of Coriolis Force
Posted on Monday, December 15, 2003 @ 23:28:55 UTC by rob
|
|
From the "Greater Things" site:
Vladimir Kangas claims to be tapping the Coriolis force to achieve 'Reactionless Propulsion'
From: Vladimir Kangas
To: sterlingda@greaterthings.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 2:03 PM
Subject: FreeEnergy.GreaterThings.com Contact
Free Energy
This time, everywhere in the world, there is an intensive search for new sources of energy; some of them could be characterized as attempts to find the "holy grail" in the form of the Perpetual Motion Machine. Since this term had been hopelessly discredited, the politically correct substitutes as "Free Energy", "New Energy" were found. There numerous sites of the Internet where scientific institutes, organizations, and scientists are listed as involved in the "Free Energy" problem solution. Huge, if not astronomical funds to support this research are spent with the results close to zero. There are several "Free Energy" prizes, but so far nobody has won any of them. The question arises: "Why the efficiency of this work is so low?"
The "Free Energy" problem solution could be referred to a device which collects energy from a source which is not recognized by contemporary science or even contradicts it. Then the answer could be very simple - the main obstacle in further developments in Physics (Mechanics) is Physics itself, or more correctly, its postulates, among them there are conservation laws of Newton' mechanics. Numerous but unsuccessful attempts to refute these fundamental laws lead to situation that the classic Newton' mechanics became indisputable and, thus, a barrier to new ideas development. All that is not complying with these laws is rejected and cannot be a subject of consideration and discussion. Thus, medieval inquisition is superseded by dogmatic scientists whose behavior reminds that of surrounded by red flags wolves who are ready to die rather then to overstep them. However, among new ideas can be met those deserving the attention, for example, a case of the Coriolis force which is the inertia force and has the "double" effect.
I have proposed fifty years ago to use this effect for to disbalance internal forces in a closed system resulting in a body displacement without any external action, i.e. to displace the center of mass at the expenses of only internal forces. The effect could be called as "reactionless" propulsion. Till this time, I have got the Swedish patent No. 510 440 and the US patent No. 6321783 confirming my discovery. In spite of this, because my discovery formally contradicts the Third law- the holy grail of Newton' mechanics, I failed to get any recognition and support from any side of scientific community.
Til this time, already hundreds of scientists have become familiar with my estimations, but none of them express the will to discuss the subject with me due to the conservatism of thinking I have mentioned above. I do consider that my discovery could be a real breakthrough in the field of mechanics and, as a consequence, in space propulsion and energy production.
03-06-26
Vladimir Kangas
Note: This is also a follow-up on Kangas posted some time ago at ZPEnergy.com.
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 2 Votes: 2

| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Patents awarded for usage of Coriolis Force (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 @ 11:02:44 UTC | | Why are these inventors so concerned with impressing scientists? Who cares about scientists. If you can make something that works, build it. Sell it. Make it available. Put a video on the internet showing that it works. Invite people from far and wide to come see it. Accept donations if you want. Just get the technology out to the people, and dont worry about patents -- they are meaningless. If you have a patent on something that actually works, dont expect that anyone will simply not make it and not sell it, because they will. If you are such a marketing failure that you cant make any money off it, then someone else probably should be. Just be happy that you will have moved humanity forward. Federal currencies will be worthless shortlly after such a device makes it into the public hands anyways, so what is the point of trying to protect your financial interests? There will be no need for money when there is free energy and virtually limitless resources. |
|
|
Re: Patents awarded for usage of Coriolis Force (Score: 1) by ElectroDynaCat on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 @ 10:38:54 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) | | If only 1% of what claims made by the posters on this blog were realized, it would be whole new world. Still waiting! |
|
|
Higgs Particle and Scalar Physics (Score: 1) by Nano (nanoman@nanoman.com) on Wednesday, December 24, 2003 @ 15:28:43 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) | A question: Is the Higgs particle that big nuclear physics is searching for, the same "scalar" stuff that Bearden and others discuss, the aether, just under a different name?
I am interested in the idea of using nano and micro engineering to construct metal sandwiches that tap into the Cassimir Force. How can I begin a career in this field?
Read this bit of sci fi and tell me what you think of it:
Higgs technology deals with manipulation of the Higgs scalar field and related forces within the Standard Model of particle physics. All particles get their mass from the interaction between the Higgs field, particles and the background vacuum; if this is modified apparent mass can be changed, particles transmuted and gravity modified. The great discovery was that this can be done without using extreme energy levels by exploiting the so-called "Abdela Mechanism". Currently higgstech is the cutting edge (together with nanotechnology) - several of the colonies race to develop and apply it to everything from space travel to microsurgery.
The simplest application of higgsfield technology is force production and antigravity. A force unit can produce a repulsive or attractive mechanical force acting against the space-time background. Antigravity, or rather mass nullification, makes an object more or less massive. This field is still much in its infancy, but investors are scrambling for agrav shares.
The "first law of antigravity" says that higgstech cannot produce a perpetual motion device; the amount of work done by a force unit has to be less than the amount of energy put in, and lifting an object by antigravity will require more energy than is gained in potential energy. Antigravity plates for example have reasonable power consumption when the object is at rest, but will consume more energy if it rises (proportional to its mass and height). If the object falls, then a reverse surge may occur, damaging the unit if it cannot neutralise or dissipate it. In general antigravity units are more useful for moving things around at the same height than lifting them (antigravity support for shuttles still remains useful, since the amount of reaction mass that has to be kept onboard can be decreased).
On Atlantis, antigravity is sometimes used in buildings, making it possible to move them. Since making the whole building weightless would cause the interior to become weightless, such movable buildings (often called drifthouses) usually just give the foundations a strong negative acceleration and let them hold up the whole building. Drifthouses have revolutionised the otherwise quite movable cities; many city locations are little more than parking lots for buildings to land on and the population can change very quickly depending on local events, the climate or fads. Most buildings are not intended to stay aloft for long, and tend to follow the ground (just like their non-antigravity counterparts, which move using add-on wheels or air). One notable exception is the famous "Magritte’s Revenge" (and its successor "Falling Concrete") by Eduard Weber 4, a villa deliberately built to hover at 300 meters above the sea on the east coast of Heinlein. Needless to say, the antigravity systems are triply failsafe.
Theoretically it should be possible to increase or decrease momentum, but Geodesic Systems haven’t figured that one out yet; their systems tend to misbehave wildly. The Mothers seem to have discovered how to do it, but realise the trade advantage of not simply explaining it. Instead they sell pre-packaged units. In general human gravity and force manipulation is somewhat rickety, even if it is getting better and changing society at a fast rate.
Confused matter is another possibility. When the Higgs-field fluctuates enough matter becomes unstable on the quantum level: particles "forget" their properties, and spontaneously decay. This causes partial conversion of matter into energy, but also confuses nearby matter. The first experiments almost ended in disaster, and Geodesic Systems have built a special laboratory in orbit around Aristotle where a runaway confusion would be safe. The promise of total or partial matter-energy conversion drives further research, but the only results so far have been devices that can cause enormous detonations or set up "confusion fields" in space that makes incoming matter to decay energetically. The military applications are frightening and fascinating.
Complex Higgs fields can form solitons and topological defects, producing very strange results. This is currently beyond human technology (the mothers have some simpler developments and the filigrees are suspected of being very advanced). Among the theoretically postulated possibilities are soliton packets that can send information, disrupt another Higgs field or induce confusion from afar; the production of magnetic monopoles that make matter-energy conversion possible; possibly the construction of "fake matter" that behaves like matter but actually is just a complex field process. Another fascinating possibility is to give neutrinos mass. According to theory, a certain kind of very high energy field can give neutrinos a high mass, making the background blaze of neutrinos interact with matter or perhaps even crystallise into some kind of solid. The creation of small, very unstable black holes is also plausible with this technology. So far this remains theoretical physics.
|
|
|
|
|