 |
There are currently, 290 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Does the Big Bang Theory Require the Existance of Energy from the Dirac Sea?
Posted on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 12:25:02 UTC by vlad
|
|
Overtone writes: Does cosmological orthodoxy demand the existence of free-energy (at least of the variety that may be tapped from Dirac's sea)?
Maybe. How does 'space' itself expand otherwise? I don't personally believe in the orthodox view anyway...but instead favor the Arp implications of a pulsating universe, nevertheless ...
For those who "want" to believe in a Big Bang singularity - a big-boum, as the French like to say, an event that actually transpired at a certain time and place, then the orthodox theory says that space itself has been expanding ever since that instant in time ~15 billion years ago. If it has expanded at near lightspeed there must exist a hidden ongoing energy source, one could surmise.
At any rate, a question that is seldom addressed is this. Did some residual mass remain after the singularity? In a 3-space universe... one that is not hollow, we must assume that some of the original matter remained fixed, and some of it accelerated at a lesser rate to fill the void... at least some experts maintain this view, and if they are correct, some residual mass should be found clumped at "ground zero". Again this does not seem any less likely than 'expanding space' itself or so-called 'inflation.' In fact, all these ideas seem on the surface like crude illogical kludges concocted without any evidence whatsoever to explain redshift, a phenomena that Arp says is mostly intrinsic... but that is another story.
So just where in the sky would be the locus of a putative big bang if Arp is wrong and the event actually transpired in a universe of only 3 spatial dimensions + time? Believe it or not, there is a candidate for an incredible residual mass ... discovered just last month by the SDSS... some would say it is a fair fraction as massive as the rest of the visible universe... depending, of course, on what assumptions you plug-in to explain the incredible extent of the lensing effect.
www.universetoday.com
"Sloan Digital Sky Survey scientists have discovered a gravitationally lensed quasar with the largest separation ever recorded, and, contrary to expectations, found that four of the most distant, most luminous quasars known are not gravitationally lensed..." More than 80 gravitationally lensed quasars have been discovered since the first example was found in 1979... but what makes this latest finding so dramatic is that the separation between the four images is twice as large as that of any previously known gravitationally lensed quasar. Until the discovery of this quadruple lens quasar, the largest separation known in a gravitationally lensed quasar was 7 arcseconds. The quasar found by the SDSS team lies in the constellation Leo Minor; it consists of four images separated by 14.62 arcseconds." END of quote
Whoa... lets just say the implications of that could be staggering - the jury is still out (or rather, hasn't even been seated yet)... and I wouldn't want to be the first to say that that a lensing effect that large could only point to one thing...
Regards,
Jones Beene
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 4.75
Votes: 4
| |
|
| "Does the Big Bang Theory Require the Existance of Energy from the Dirac Sea?" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments | Search Discussion |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Ambiguities in Quantum Mechanics and Relativity (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 13:19:17 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | From the intalek yahoo list:
Ambiguities in Quantum Mechanics and Relativity
If the universe is flat and expanding ever faster, some invisible, unidentified energy must be offsetting gravity. In the beginning, when matter was close together and the universe was dense, gravitational attraction was much stronger. Now that matter is far apart and the density of the universe is low, this mysterious energy is pushing space itself outward at an accelerating rate. Its nature is unknown.
In Quantum mechanics and Relativity have been accepted that field and mass-energy are two separable items. But Force, Energy and Mass are equivalent in Theory of CPH.
So, Dark Energy is result able of the above equivalence deduction.
Also in formal physics the attractive and repulsive gravitational force are independence and there is not any relationship between repulsive gravitational force and the limitation of speed in universe. But in Theory of CPH repulsive gravitational force and limitation of speed are depending to each other.
Also universe expanding and accelerating universe are result able of limitation of speed in Theory of CPH.
Followings are;
Theory of CPH
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/files/PDFofCPH.pdf
Dark Energy
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/files/Dark-energy.pdf
For see move of structure of photon, Dark Energy and Beginning Time contact with;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cph_theory/file
Archive is open for everyone.
Sincerely
Hossein Javadi
---------
For those into [new] controversial theories see also:
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/
http://www.grandunifiedtheory.org.il/
[Vlad]
|
|
|
Re: Does the Big Bang Theory Require the Existance of Energy from the Dirac Sea? (Score: 1)
by ElectroDynaCat on Wednesday, January 28, 2004 @ 21:31:07 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | | The ZPE concept preceded the advent of quantum mechanics, it was called prana, chi, yin by the ancient philosopher/scientist priests. At the basis of of Tao is the active principle of yin and yang a subtle undercurrent of activity between two opposing forces, negative and positive. From this otherwise unseen (virtual) conflict the Universe is created, maintained and transformed. Sort of sounds like modern cosmological theory?Where does this power come from in the modern version? From that million electron volt gap in the Dirac Sea, the God Battery, the ultimate Energizer bunny . Contrast this with the winding down clock Universe of classical physics which has been waiting for the Universe to run out of gas. Problem is it looks like the Universe has its own ideas instead of running down, its cranking up the accelerator, not stepping on the brake. The more we know, the less we know. |
|
|
|
|
