ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 189 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The Paradox 2 Experiment
Posted on Saturday, July 03, 2004 @ 15:11:55 UTC by vlad

Devices Robert J. Distinti claims that the Paradox 2 experiment demonstrates magnetic interactions that are not predicted by classical electromagnetic theory (Maxwell, Faraday, Ampere, etc).

From his site: "New Electromagnetism teaches that magnetic fields are spherical about a current element (or moving point charge). The Paradox 2 experiment proves the existence of the longitudinal components of magnetic fields; which, when combined with the classical transverse field components, yields the spherical magnetic field of New Electromagnetism...

Because DC power is developed in spite of the fact that the number of flux lines linked remains constant; this device appears to classical theory as a Paradox. More intriguing is the fact that the NET flux contained in any section of the device is ZERO (magnets are opposing); and yet energy is produced.

The Paradox 2 experiment was developed by Robert Distinti, an Electrical Engineer with over 20 years experience, to demonstrate his New Electromagnetism models.

Click here to see why this is important to the average person.

To Learn More about New Electromagnetism

Note 1: The intent of this device is to explore the laws of physics. We do not promote free energy or over-unity.

Note 2: We have accounted for all stray effects such as thermoelectric, Seebeck, triboelectric, RF coupling and others. See the document in the detailed discussion section.

Note 3: The original paradox generator (Paradox 1 – see flyer) was abandoned in lieu of the Paradox 2 which is less complicated, more decisive and less expensive. Furthermore, the Paradox 1 program is at odds with our mission to bring electromagnetic theory to the average person since it requires expert interpretation of the experimental data..."

Web site: www.distinti.com

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Devices
· News by vlad


Most read story about Devices:
Overunity magnet motor released !


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"The Paradox 2 Experiment" | Login/Create an Account | 2 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: The Paradox 2 Experiment (Score: 1)
by Technophile on Thursday, July 08, 2004 @ 08:21:30 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Thanks for posting this. It is extremely interesting and valuable, especially in understanding magnetism.



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.