|
There are currently, 116 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions
Posted on Saturday, February 16, 2008 @ 18:46:40 UTC by vlad
|
|
Now that scientists have reached a consensus that carbon dioxide
emissions from human activities are the major cause of global warming,
the next question is: How can we stop it" Can we just cut back on
carbon, or do we need to go cold turkey" According to a new study by
scientists at the Carnegie Institution, halfway measures won’t do the
job. To stabilize our planet’s climate, we need to find ways to kick
the carbon habit altogether.
In the study, to be published in Geophysical Research Letters,
climate scientists Ken Caldeira and Damon Matthews used an Earth system
model at the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology to
simulate the response of the Earth’s climate to different levels of
carbon dioxide emission over the next 500 years. The model, a
sophisticated computer program developed at the University of Victoria,
Canada, takes into account the flow of heat between the atmosphere and
oceans, as well as other factors such as the uptake of carbon dioxide
by land vegetation, in its calculations.
This is the first peer-reviewed study to investigate what level of
carbon dioxide emission would be needed to prevent further warming of
our planet.
“Most scientific and policy discussions about avoiding climate
change have centered on what emissions would be needed to stabilize
greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,” says Caldeira. “But stabilizing
greenhouse gases does not equate to a stable climate. We studied what
emissions would be needed to stabilize climate in the foreseeable
future.”
The scientists investigated how much climate changes as a result of
each individual emission of carbon dioxide, and found that each
increment of emission leads to another increment of warming. So, if we
want to avoid additional warming, we need to avoid additional
emissions.
With emissions set to zero in the simulations, the level of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere slowly fell as carbon “sinks” such as the
oceans and land vegetation absorbed the gas. Surprisingly, however, the
model predicted that global temperatures would remain high for at least
500 years after carbon dioxide emissions ceased.
Just as an iron skillet will
stay hot and keep cooking after the stove burner’s turned off, heat
held in the oceans will keep the climate warm even as the heating
effect of greenhouse gases diminishes. Adding more greenhouse gases,
even at a rate lower than today, would worsen the situation and the
effects would persist for centuries.
"What if we were to discover tomorrow that a climate catastrophe
was imminent if our planet warmed any further" To reduce emissions
enough to avoid this catastrophe, we would have to cut them close to
zero — and right away," says Caldeira.
Global carbon dioxide emissions and atmospheric carbon dioxide
concentrations are both growing at record rates. Even if we could
freeze emissions at today’s levels, atmospheric carbon dioxide
concentrations would continue to increase. If we could stabilize
atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, which would require deep
cuts in emissions, the Earth would continue heating up. Matthews and
Caldeira found that to prevent the Earth from heating further, carbon
dioxide emissions would, effectively, need to be eliminated.
While eliminating carbon dioxide emissions may seem like a radical
idea, Caldeira sees it as a feasible goal. “It is just not that hard to
solve the technological challenges,” he says. “We can develop and
deploy wind turbines, electric cars, and so on, and live well without
damaging the environment. The future can be better than the present,
but we have to take steps to start kicking the CO2 habit now, so we
won't need to go cold turkey later.”
Source: Carnegie Institution Via: http://www.physorg.com/news122290450.html
|
| |
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
PAST GREENHOUSE WARMING EVENTS PROVIDE CLUES TO WHAT THE FUTURE MAY HOLD (Score: 1) by vlad on Saturday, February 16, 2008 @ 18:55:30 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com | If carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels continue on a "business-as-usual" trajectory, humans will have added about 5 trillion metric tons of carbon to the atmosphere by the year 2400. A similarly massive release of carbon accompanied an extreme period of global warming 55 million years ago known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM). Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news122309112.html [www.physorg.com]
|
Re: PAST GREENHOUSE WARMING EVENTS PROVIDE CLUES TO WHAT THE FUTURE MAY HOLD (Score: 1) by malc on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 00:36:14 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley | The problem with stating a year like 2400 is that nobody today gives a damn because its so far in the future. If we try and estimate the affects on our children and grandchildren then that concentrates peoples minds.
It's good to see at long last that zero emissions are being called for. The current carbon trading schemes are utter nonsense and simply allow governments and industry to look as if they are "carbon friendly" whilst the emissions continue to increase. |
]
|
|
Re: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions (Score: 1) by Koen on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 01:17:10 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla | if CO2 is such an urgent problem, then why are world wide investments into new CO2 reducing technologies so minimal?
But then, there is NO proof whatsoever for CO2 as "GreenHouseGas" (not theoretical, not experimental). Global warming can have plenty of causes, and CO2 as greenhouse gas is just one of them, and one of the most UNLIKELY causes. Historic data can not be trusted in order to conclude the causal relationship global CO2 rise -> global warming. It could be the other way around: global warming -> plantlife dies off -> global release of CO2 to atmosphere.
Then a CO2-global-warming runnaway effect is only an imaginary after-thought of an imaginary CO2 greenhouse effect.
I am much more woried about - global die off of plant/animal life, because of human activities, causing more bio-instability. Global bio-instability could lead to a domino effect of death, including menkind. - world war 3 as consequence of global monopolies and "illuminati" power play; the elite is planning for a master-slave upgrade, probably because of the growing bio-instability.
The power elite ignores the fact that biology and economy should be organised and be autonomous on many scales (from small local dymamic systems, to a global worldwide systems). This is because natural biology and economy systems are non-linear in nature. So globalisation is totally unnatural and causes great instability of the bio/human systems. It is mainly the power elite that causes our problems, although we get plenty of media messages that "we" are the problem. Don't believe it.
|
|
|
Re: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions (Score: 1) by Technophile on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 09:13:40 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) | Both premises are false. 1st, Climate variation is primarily caused by solar variance, not CO2. CO2 lags temperature due to the fact that the oceans release CO2 when they warm, and absorb it when they cool. 2nd, there is no global warming as satellite temperature data (the most accurate measure we have) show that we are now back below the 1979-present average. http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/rss-satellite-data-for-jan08-2nd-coldest-january-for-the-planet-in-15-years/
"Global warming" is a political hoax. Its time has passed now that the Sun is going into a quiet phase, and the planet is rapidly cooling. Give it a rest already!
|
Re: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions (Score: 1) by Technophile on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 09:37:31 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) | see also: http://ncwatch.typepad.com/dalton_minimum_returns/files/SolarInfluence.pdf
|
]
|
|
|
|