ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 116 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions
Posted on Saturday, February 16, 2008 @ 18:46:40 UTC by vlad

General Now that scientists have reached a consensus that carbon dioxide emissions from human activities are the major cause of global warming, the next question is: How can we stop it" Can we just cut back on carbon, or do we need to go cold turkey" According to a new study by scientists at the Carnegie Institution, halfway measures won’t do the job. To stabilize our planet’s climate, we need to find ways to kick the carbon habit altogether.

In the study, to be published in Geophysical Research Letters, climate scientists Ken Caldeira and Damon Matthews used an Earth system model at the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology to simulate the response of the Earth’s climate to different levels of carbon dioxide emission over the next 500 years. The model, a sophisticated computer program developed at the University of Victoria, Canada, takes into account the flow of heat between the atmosphere and oceans, as well as other factors such as the uptake of carbon dioxide by land vegetation, in its calculations.

This is the first peer-reviewed study to investigate what level of carbon dioxide emission would be needed to prevent further warming of our planet.

“Most scientific and policy discussions about avoiding climate change have centered on what emissions would be needed to stabilize greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,” says Caldeira. “But stabilizing greenhouse gases does not equate to a stable climate. We studied what emissions would be needed to stabilize climate in the foreseeable future.”

The scientists investigated how much climate changes as a result of each individual emission of carbon dioxide, and found that each increment of emission leads to another increment of warming. So, if we want to avoid additional warming, we need to avoid additional emissions.

With emissions set to zero in the simulations, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere slowly fell as carbon “sinks” such as the oceans and land vegetation absorbed the gas. Surprisingly, however, the model predicted that global temperatures would remain high for at least 500 years after carbon dioxide emissions ceased.

Just as an iron skillet will stay hot and keep cooking after the stove burner’s turned off, heat held in the oceans will keep the climate warm even as the heating effect of greenhouse gases diminishes. Adding more greenhouse gases, even at a rate lower than today, would worsen the situation and the effects would persist for centuries.

"What if we were to discover tomorrow that a climate catastrophe was imminent if our planet warmed any further" To reduce emissions enough to avoid this catastrophe, we would have to cut them close to zero — and right away," says Caldeira.

Global carbon dioxide emissions and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are both growing at record rates. Even if we could freeze emissions at today’s levels, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations would continue to increase. If we could stabilize atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, which would require deep cuts in emissions, the Earth would continue heating up. Matthews and Caldeira found that to prevent the Earth from heating further, carbon dioxide emissions would, effectively, need to be eliminated.

While eliminating carbon dioxide emissions may seem like a radical idea, Caldeira sees it as a feasible goal. “It is just not that hard to solve the technological challenges,” he says. “We can develop and deploy wind turbines, electric cars, and so on, and live well without damaging the environment. The future can be better than the present, but we have to take steps to start kicking the CO2 habit now, so we won't need to go cold turkey later.”

Source: Carnegie Institution
Via: http://www.physorg.com/news122290450.html

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about General
· News by vlad


Most read story about General:
Z machine melts diamond to puddle


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions" | Login/Create an Account | 5 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

PAST GREENHOUSE WARMING EVENTS PROVIDE CLUES TO WHAT THE FUTURE MAY HOLD (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, February 16, 2008 @ 18:55:30 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
If carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels continue on a "business-as-usual" trajectory, humans will have added about 5 trillion metric tons of carbon to the atmosphere by the year 2400. A similarly massive release of carbon accompanied an extreme period of global warming 55 million years ago known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM).
Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news122309112.html [www.physorg.com]





Re: PAST GREENHOUSE WARMING EVENTS PROVIDE CLUES TO WHAT THE FUTURE MAY HOLD (Score: 1)
by malc on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 00:36:14 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
The problem with stating a year like 2400 is that nobody today gives a damn because its so far in the future. If we try and estimate the affects on our children and grandchildren then that concentrates peoples minds.

It's good to see at long last that zero emissions are being called for. The current carbon trading schemes are utter nonsense and simply allow governments and industry to look as if they are "carbon friendly" whilst the emissions continue to increase.


]


Re: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions (Score: 1)
by Koen on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 01:17:10 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
if CO2  is such an urgent problem, then why are world wide investments into new CO2 reducing  technologies so minimal?

But then, there is NO proof whatsoever for CO2 as "GreenHouseGas"   (not theoretical, not experimental).  Global warming can have plenty of causes, and CO2 as greenhouse gas  is just one of them, and one of the most UNLIKELY causes.  Historic data can not be trusted in order to conclude the causal relationship  global CO2 rise ->  global warming.  It could be the other way around:  global warming -> plantlife dies off  ->  global release of CO2  to atmosphere.

Then a CO2-global-warming runnaway effect is only an imaginary after-thought  of an imaginary CO2 greenhouse effect.

I am much more woried about
- global die off of plant/animal life, because of human activities, causing more bio-instability.
Global bio-instability could lead to a domino effect of death, including menkind.
- world war 3  as consequence of global monopolies and "illuminati" power play; the elite is planning for a master-slave upgrade,  probably because of the growing bio-instability.


The power elite ignores the fact that biology and economy should be organised and be autonomous on many scales (from small local dymamic systems, to a global worldwide systems).
This is because natural biology and economy systems are non-linear in nature.
So globalisation is totally unnatural and causes great instability of the bio/human systems.
It is mainly the power elite that causes our problems, although we get plenty of media messages that "we" are the problem. Don't believe it.




Re: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions (Score: 1)
by Technophile on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 09:13:40 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Both premises are false.
1st, Climate variation is primarily caused by solar variance, not CO2. CO2 lags temperature due to the fact that the oceans release CO2 when they warm, and absorb it when they cool.
2nd, there is no global warming as satellite temperature data (the most accurate measure we have) show that we are now back below the 1979-present average. http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/rss-satellite-data-for-jan08-2nd-coldest-january-for-the-planet-in-15-years/

"Global warming" is a political hoax. Its time has passed now that the Sun is going into a quiet phase, and the planet is rapidly cooling. Give it a rest already! 




Re: Stabilizing climate requires near-zero carbon emissions (Score: 1)
by Technophile on Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 09:37:31 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
see also: http://ncwatch.typepad.com/dalton_minimum_returns/files/SolarInfluence.pdf


]


 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.